The Abrupt Educational Switch: Impact of COVID-19 and Lessons Learned for Health Science Faculty and Students

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2272
Kathleen Klein, MaryLou Galantino, Tara Crowell, Renne Cavazza
{"title":"The Abrupt Educational Switch: Impact of COVID-19 and Lessons Learned for Health Science Faculty and Students","authors":"Kathleen Klein, MaryLou Galantino, Tara Crowell, Renne Cavazza","doi":"10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The abrupt educational transition from in-class to virtual instruction during spring of 2020 found many faculty and students in uncharted territory. The purpose of this study was to survey both faculty and students in the School of Health Sciences to better understand the switch from face-to-face instruction to remote learning. Methods: Both qualitative and quantitative data was collected regarding this experience. The first task was to identify faculty’s responses and actions taken, perception of alternative teaching experience and impact on student learning, determine needs to prepare and address new course design and delivery, and explore perception of changes to healthcare professions. The second task was to explore students' perceptions of their chosen health professions based on experience with COVID-19, their educational experience during Spring 2020, the impact of remote learning on clinical decision making/critical thinking with COVID-19 as a new reality in healthcare environments, and to identify anticipated needs for continued education with alternate course delivery methods. Results: The majority of faculty felt prepared for the switch, most delivered asynchronous course vs. synchronous interactive on-line classroom learning, and courses such as labs, clinicals, simulations and internships faced greater difficulties. Students reported that faculty did a good job of adjusting to remote learning, appreciated their level of accommodation and flexibility, especially given that almost two-thirds reported experiencing stress and anxiety during this time, felt prepared for this transition, but miss the face-to-face classroom experience. Based on experience with COVID-19, students’ perceptions of future health-care careers were both positive and negative. Conclusion: The implications of results are discussed, “take-aways” and “best practices” provided, along with identifying limitations and future research.","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2023.2272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The abrupt educational transition from in-class to virtual instruction during spring of 2020 found many faculty and students in uncharted territory. The purpose of this study was to survey both faculty and students in the School of Health Sciences to better understand the switch from face-to-face instruction to remote learning. Methods: Both qualitative and quantitative data was collected regarding this experience. The first task was to identify faculty’s responses and actions taken, perception of alternative teaching experience and impact on student learning, determine needs to prepare and address new course design and delivery, and explore perception of changes to healthcare professions. The second task was to explore students' perceptions of their chosen health professions based on experience with COVID-19, their educational experience during Spring 2020, the impact of remote learning on clinical decision making/critical thinking with COVID-19 as a new reality in healthcare environments, and to identify anticipated needs for continued education with alternate course delivery methods. Results: The majority of faculty felt prepared for the switch, most delivered asynchronous course vs. synchronous interactive on-line classroom learning, and courses such as labs, clinicals, simulations and internships faced greater difficulties. Students reported that faculty did a good job of adjusting to remote learning, appreciated their level of accommodation and flexibility, especially given that almost two-thirds reported experiencing stress and anxiety during this time, felt prepared for this transition, but miss the face-to-face classroom experience. Based on experience with COVID-19, students’ perceptions of future health-care careers were both positive and negative. Conclusion: The implications of results are discussed, “take-aways” and “best practices” provided, along with identifying limitations and future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突然的教育转变:COVID-19的影响和对卫生科学教师和学生的教训
目的:2020年春季,从课堂教学到虚拟教学的突然转变使许多教师和学生处于未知的领域。本研究的目的是调查健康科学学院的教师和学生,以更好地了解从面对面教学到远程学习的转变。方法:采用定性和定量相结合的方法,对患者的临床经验进行分析。第一个任务是确定教师的反应和采取的行动,对替代教学经验和对学生学习的影响的看法,确定准备和解决新课程设计和交付的需求,并探索对医疗保健专业变化的看法。第二个任务是根据2019冠状病毒病的经历、他们在2020年春季的教育经历、远程学习对临床决策/批判性思维的影响(COVID-19是医疗保健环境中的新现实),探索学生对所选择的卫生专业的看法,并通过替代课程交付方法确定对继续教育的预期需求。结果:大多数教师对这种转变做好了准备,大多数提供的是异步课程,而不是同步互动在线课堂学习,而实验室、临床、模拟和实习等课程面临更大的困难。学生们报告说,教师在适应远程学习方面做得很好,赞赏他们的住宿水平和灵活性,特别是考虑到近三分之二的人表示在这段时间里经历了压力和焦虑,他们为这种转变做好了准备,但却想念面对面的课堂体验。根据2019冠状病毒病的经验,学生对未来医疗保健职业的看法既有积极的,也有消极的。结论:讨论了结果的含义,提供了“要点”和“最佳实践”,并指出了局限性和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
DTSaM を用いた橈骨遠位端骨折の治療成績 スマートフォンを用いた反張膝の測定方法に対する予備的研究 自閉スペクトラム症児における日本版感覚プロファイルを用いた感覚反応に対する幼児と学齢児の比較 介護老人保健施設における日常生活動作能力と転帰先との関連性 Effectiveness of WiiⓇ-based rehabilitation in Patients with Brain Tumors:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1