Assessment of Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Patients of Non-diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease in Various Stages: Pre-dialysis, Dialysis, and Kidney Transplant Recipients

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Indian Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.4103/ijn.ijn_170_23
Madhuvanthini Nethaji, Siddhartha K. Bhattaram, Vishnubhotla Sivakumar
{"title":"Assessment of Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Patients of Non-diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease in Various Stages: Pre-dialysis, Dialysis, and Kidney Transplant Recipients","authors":"Madhuvanthini Nethaji, Siddhartha K. Bhattaram, Vishnubhotla Sivakumar","doi":"10.4103/ijn.ijn_170_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by progressive nephron loss, leading to irreversible decrease in GFR and loss in renal function.[1] Five to ten percent of the world’s population is estimated to be suffering from CKD.[2] The Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 ranked CKD as the 8th leading cause of death in India.[3] The overall age-adjusted incidence rate of end-stage renal disease in India is 229 million.[4] Very few studies that assess the quality of life in various stages of CKD, including dialysis and transplantation, have been done in our country. The disease burden has a strong impact on the patient’s quality of life (QOL) and other associated factors. Our study included 120 subjects: 30 each in CKD, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation. The mean age of the study participants was 43.31 ± 11.99 years. The male-to-female ratio was 2:1. Of the total number of participants, 86.7% were married and 60.8% belonged to the upper-middle class. Sixty-one percent of the study participants belonged to the normal BMI range, and 28.3% were graduates. The aetiologies for CKD were chronic gloemrulonephritis(55/120; 45.83%), unknown aetiology (51/120;42.5%) and chronic pyelonephritis (14/120; 11%). The health-related QOL (HRQOL) was studied using Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 36 (KDQOL-SF 36) version 1.3[5] from RAND corporation, which has been validated in our population. The kidney disease–specific instrument assesses the burden of kidney disease in 11 domains (symptoms or problems of kidney disease, burden of kidney disease, effects of kidney disease, work status, cognitive function, quality of social interaction, sexual function, sleep, social support, patient satisfaction, and dialysis staff encouragement). Each domain is scored on a 100-point scale, with higher scores representing better QOL. The individual scores can be averaged to a kidney disease component summary (KDCS) score. The SF-36 assesses the HRQOL in eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical problems, role limitations caused by emotional problems, pain, general health, energy or fatigue, emotional well-being, and social function). Results from the SF-36 are further summarized into a physical composite summary (PCS) and a mental composite summary (MCS) score. The QOL in the four groups is listed in Table 1. Symptom burden and problem, effects of kidney disease, burden of kidney disease, and KDCS were highest. Quality of social interaction and sleep was higher in the transplant group. There seemed to be no difference in the dialysis groups. The work status was affected in all the groups, with better scores noted in the dialysis groups.Table 1: Healthrelated quality of life among CKD , hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, transplantThe SF-36 scores are tabulated in Table 1. Physical functioning, role physical, general health, role emotional, and PCS were well preserved in the transplant group. Emotional well-being and MCS were comparable. In physical functioning, physical role was better in PD compared to hemodialysis (HD). In social functioning, significantly lower scores were seen in the transplant group and peritoneal dialysis group, whereas the highest score was seen in the CKD group. The physical and mental composite scores were better in the transplant group. The impact of social and demographic parameters (age, gender, marital and socioeconomic status, BMI, and education) is tabulated in Table 2. A significant impact of age, socioeconomic status, and education was observed only on the PCS scores, and there was no impact on the MCS scores and the KDCS scores. PCS showed a significantly declining trend with respect to age, with higher scores noted in the younger age group; this implied a higher threshold and better ways of coping. Men were found to have better PCS, MCS, and KDCS scores. Upper class and higher education had significantly higher scores in the PCS. This data, when analyzed under multiple linear regression, emphasized irrespective of the socioeconomic class of the study subjects, in KDCS domain education plays an important role in raising an awareness on health thus bringing the P value to 0.029 , where as it does not seem to affect the PCS and MCS. In the analysis of SF-36, we observed that RT patients scored better results compared to the other three groups. In the dialysis groups, PD patients had better scores in physical and emotional well-being. Overall, the scores were poor in HD in comparison with others. The PCS showed a nonsignificant declining trend from RT to HD, whereas the MCS was comparable in all the groups.Table 2: Impact of social and clinical parameters on quality of life scoresIn conclusion, transplant patients had a better QOL with respect to physical functioning, role physical, general health, role emotional, and PCS. CKD patients had better work status and KDCS scores. In the dialysis groups, PD patients had better physical and emotional well-being. Socioeconomic status and education seem to play an important role in influencing the QOL. The higher the education status, the better was the QOL. All four groups required emotional support uniformly. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":13359,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Nephrology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijn.ijn_170_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by progressive nephron loss, leading to irreversible decrease in GFR and loss in renal function.[1] Five to ten percent of the world’s population is estimated to be suffering from CKD.[2] The Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 ranked CKD as the 8th leading cause of death in India.[3] The overall age-adjusted incidence rate of end-stage renal disease in India is 229 million.[4] Very few studies that assess the quality of life in various stages of CKD, including dialysis and transplantation, have been done in our country. The disease burden has a strong impact on the patient’s quality of life (QOL) and other associated factors. Our study included 120 subjects: 30 each in CKD, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation. The mean age of the study participants was 43.31 ± 11.99 years. The male-to-female ratio was 2:1. Of the total number of participants, 86.7% were married and 60.8% belonged to the upper-middle class. Sixty-one percent of the study participants belonged to the normal BMI range, and 28.3% were graduates. The aetiologies for CKD were chronic gloemrulonephritis(55/120; 45.83%), unknown aetiology (51/120;42.5%) and chronic pyelonephritis (14/120; 11%). The health-related QOL (HRQOL) was studied using Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 36 (KDQOL-SF 36) version 1.3[5] from RAND corporation, which has been validated in our population. The kidney disease–specific instrument assesses the burden of kidney disease in 11 domains (symptoms or problems of kidney disease, burden of kidney disease, effects of kidney disease, work status, cognitive function, quality of social interaction, sexual function, sleep, social support, patient satisfaction, and dialysis staff encouragement). Each domain is scored on a 100-point scale, with higher scores representing better QOL. The individual scores can be averaged to a kidney disease component summary (KDCS) score. The SF-36 assesses the HRQOL in eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical problems, role limitations caused by emotional problems, pain, general health, energy or fatigue, emotional well-being, and social function). Results from the SF-36 are further summarized into a physical composite summary (PCS) and a mental composite summary (MCS) score. The QOL in the four groups is listed in Table 1. Symptom burden and problem, effects of kidney disease, burden of kidney disease, and KDCS were highest. Quality of social interaction and sleep was higher in the transplant group. There seemed to be no difference in the dialysis groups. The work status was affected in all the groups, with better scores noted in the dialysis groups.Table 1: Healthrelated quality of life among CKD , hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, transplantThe SF-36 scores are tabulated in Table 1. Physical functioning, role physical, general health, role emotional, and PCS were well preserved in the transplant group. Emotional well-being and MCS were comparable. In physical functioning, physical role was better in PD compared to hemodialysis (HD). In social functioning, significantly lower scores were seen in the transplant group and peritoneal dialysis group, whereas the highest score was seen in the CKD group. The physical and mental composite scores were better in the transplant group. The impact of social and demographic parameters (age, gender, marital and socioeconomic status, BMI, and education) is tabulated in Table 2. A significant impact of age, socioeconomic status, and education was observed only on the PCS scores, and there was no impact on the MCS scores and the KDCS scores. PCS showed a significantly declining trend with respect to age, with higher scores noted in the younger age group; this implied a higher threshold and better ways of coping. Men were found to have better PCS, MCS, and KDCS scores. Upper class and higher education had significantly higher scores in the PCS. This data, when analyzed under multiple linear regression, emphasized irrespective of the socioeconomic class of the study subjects, in KDCS domain education plays an important role in raising an awareness on health thus bringing the P value to 0.029 , where as it does not seem to affect the PCS and MCS. In the analysis of SF-36, we observed that RT patients scored better results compared to the other three groups. In the dialysis groups, PD patients had better scores in physical and emotional well-being. Overall, the scores were poor in HD in comparison with others. The PCS showed a nonsignificant declining trend from RT to HD, whereas the MCS was comparable in all the groups.Table 2: Impact of social and clinical parameters on quality of life scoresIn conclusion, transplant patients had a better QOL with respect to physical functioning, role physical, general health, role emotional, and PCS. CKD patients had better work status and KDCS scores. In the dialysis groups, PD patients had better physical and emotional well-being. Socioeconomic status and education seem to play an important role in influencing the QOL. The higher the education status, the better was the QOL. All four groups required emotional support uniformly. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非糖尿病性慢性肾病患者不同阶段的生活质量及相关因素评估:透析前、透析和肾移植受者
慢性肾脏疾病(Chronic kidney disease, CKD)以进行性肾元丧失为特征,导致GFR不可逆下降和肾功能丧失[1]。据估计,世界上5%到10%的人口患有慢性肾病。[2]2015年全球疾病负担研究将CKD列为印度第八大死亡原因。[3]印度终末期肾病的总年龄调整发病率为2.29亿。[4]评估CKD各个阶段(包括透析和移植)的生活质量的研究在我国还很少。疾病负担对患者的生活质量(QOL)和其他相关因素有很大影响。我们的研究包括120名受试者:CKD、血液透析、腹膜透析和肾移植各30名。研究参与者的平均年龄为43.31±11.99岁。男女比例为2:1。在所有参与者中,86.7%的人已婚,60.8%的人属于中上层阶级。61%的研究参与者属于正常的BMI范围,28.3%是大学毕业生。CKD的病因为慢性肾小球肾炎(55/120;45.83%),病因不明(51/120;42.5%)和慢性肾盂肾炎(14/120;11%)。与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)使用RAND公司的肾脏疾病生活质量短表36 (KDQOL-SF 36) 1.3版[5]进行研究,该版本已在我们的人群中得到验证。肾脏疾病特异性工具评估肾脏疾病在11个领域的负担(肾脏疾病的症状或问题、肾脏疾病的负担、肾脏疾病的影响、工作状态、认知功能、社会互动质量、性功能、睡眠、社会支持、患者满意度和透析工作人员的鼓励)。每个领域都以100分制进行评分,分数越高代表生活质量越好。个体评分可以平均为肾脏疾病成分汇总(KDCS)评分。SF-36从八个方面评估HRQOL(身体功能、身体问题引起的角色限制、情绪问题引起的角色限制、疼痛、一般健康、精力或疲劳、情绪健康和社会功能)。SF-36的结果进一步汇总为物理综合总结(PCS)和心理综合总结(MCS)得分。表1列出了四组的生活质量。症状负担和问题、肾脏疾病的影响、肾脏疾病负担和KDCS最高。移植组的社会交往质量和睡眠质量更高。透析组之间似乎没有差异。所有组的工作状态都受到影响,透析组的得分更高。表1:CKD、血液透析、腹膜透析、移植患者的健康相关生活质量。SF-36评分见表1。移植组的生理功能、生理功能、总体健康、情感功能和PCS均保存良好。情绪幸福感和MCS具有可比性。在生理功能方面,PD组的生理功能优于HD组。在社会功能方面,移植组和腹膜透析组得分明显较低,而CKD组得分最高。移植组的身心综合评分较移植组高。社会和人口参数(年龄、性别、婚姻和社会经济地位、BMI和教育)的影响列于表2。年龄、社会经济地位和受教育程度仅对PCS分数有显著影响,对MCS分数和KDCS分数没有影响。随着年龄的增长,个人能力得分呈明显下降趋势,年龄越小得分越高;这意味着更高的门槛和更好的应对方式。男性的PCS、MCS和KDCS得分更高。上层阶级和高等教育程度的人在个人信息测验中的得分显著更高。在多元线性回归分析下,该数据强调,无论研究对象的社会经济阶层如何,在KDCS领域,教育在提高健康意识方面发挥着重要作用,从而使P值达到0.029,而它似乎不影响PCS和MCS。在SF-36的分析中,我们观察到与其他三组相比,RT患者获得了更好的结果。在透析组中,PD患者在身体和情感健康方面得分更高。总的来说,与其他国家相比,他们在高清方面的得分很低。从RT到HD, PCS表现出不显著的下降趋势,而MCS在所有组中都具有可比性。表2:社会和临床参数对生活质量评分的影响结论:移植患者在身体功能、角色身体、一般健康、角色情感和PCS方面的生活质量更好。CKD患者有较好的工作状态和KDCS评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Nephrology
Indian Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fibrillary Glomerulonephritis with Prevalent IgA Deposition Associated with Psoriasis. Concomitant Parvovirus B19 and CMV Infection in a Child with Kidney Transplant. Effectiveness of Belimumab for Glucocorticoid Discontinuation in Juvenile-Onset Lupus Nephritis. Factor V Leiden Heterozygous Mutation and Hyperhomocysteinemia Presenting with Vascular Rejection and Renal Allograft Infarction. Sapovirus-Associated Diarrhea in Renal Transplant Patient Treated Without Altering Immunosuppression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1