Involving students in engineering course design: a combined approach based on constructive alignment and multi-criteria decision-making

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/03043797.2023.2279055
Ebru Turanoglu Bekar, Anders Skoogh, Jon Bokrantz
{"title":"Involving students in engineering course design: a combined approach based on constructive alignment and multi-criteria decision-making","authors":"Ebru Turanoglu Bekar, Anders Skoogh, Jon Bokrantz","doi":"10.1080/03043797.2023.2279055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empowering students to actively shape their learning is essential. Various student involvement models, such as design-based research, participatory design, and co-creation, emphasise students’ growing role in shaping educational activities. Engaging students in course design, as seen in student co-creation, can enhance agency, improve the student experience, and boost outcomes. Considering this, we propose a systematic approach combining multi-criteria decision-making with constructive alignment theory to involve students as co-creators in course design. This approach aims to engage students in the course design process and co-create intended learning outcomes, which can be regarded as the primary participatory phase in developing a co-created course. By involving students, our approach aims to gain insight into their needs, prioritise their views, and guide the formulation of appropriate course specifications throughout the course design process. The approach is applied to a new multi-disciplinary engineering course, and the results are summarised following its corresponding steps. Students’ feedback indicates that the approach positively influenced their motivation, engagement with course objectives, collaboration with teachers, and overall achievement of intended learning outcomes. This study’s significance lies in its contribution to higher education, offering a more integrated and systematic approach to support co-creation between educators and learners in academic course design.","PeriodicalId":47348,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2279055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empowering students to actively shape their learning is essential. Various student involvement models, such as design-based research, participatory design, and co-creation, emphasise students’ growing role in shaping educational activities. Engaging students in course design, as seen in student co-creation, can enhance agency, improve the student experience, and boost outcomes. Considering this, we propose a systematic approach combining multi-criteria decision-making with constructive alignment theory to involve students as co-creators in course design. This approach aims to engage students in the course design process and co-create intended learning outcomes, which can be regarded as the primary participatory phase in developing a co-created course. By involving students, our approach aims to gain insight into their needs, prioritise their views, and guide the formulation of appropriate course specifications throughout the course design process. The approach is applied to a new multi-disciplinary engineering course, and the results are summarised following its corresponding steps. Students’ feedback indicates that the approach positively influenced their motivation, engagement with course objectives, collaboration with teachers, and overall achievement of intended learning outcomes. This study’s significance lies in its contribution to higher education, offering a more integrated and systematic approach to support co-creation between educators and learners in academic course design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让学生参与工程课程设计:一种基于建设性一致性和多标准决策的组合方法
让学生积极地塑造他们的学习是至关重要的。各种各样的学生参与模式,如基于设计的研究、参与式设计和共同创造,都强调了学生在塑造教育活动中的日益重要的作用。让学生参与课程设计,就像学生共同创造一样,可以增强能动性,改善学生体验,并促进成果。考虑到这一点,我们提出了一种将多标准决策与建设性一致性理论相结合的系统方法,让学生作为共同创造者参与课程设计。这种方法旨在让学生参与课程设计过程,共同创造预期的学习成果,这可以被视为开发共同创建课程的主要参与阶段。通过让学生参与进来,我们的方法旨在深入了解他们的需求,优先考虑他们的意见,并在整个课程设计过程中指导制定适当的课程规格。将该方法应用于一门新的多学科工程课程,并根据相应的步骤总结了结果。学生的反馈表明,这种方法对他们的学习动机、对课程目标的参与、与教师的合作以及预期学习成果的总体实现产生了积极的影响。本研究的意义在于对高等教育的贡献,提供了一个更完整和系统的方法来支持教育者和学习者在学术课程设计中的共同创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Engineering Education
European Journal of Engineering Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: European Journal of Engineering Education is published six times a year in print and electronic editions and provides an essential forum for dialogue between researchers and specialists in the field of engineering education, at European and worldwide levels. European Journal of Engineering Education is the Official Journal of SEFI, the Socièté Européenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs (the European Society for Engineering Education). SEFI is a non-governmental organization whose aims are to develop information about engineering education, to improve communication and exchange between professors, researchers and students and to promote cooperation between the various institutions concerned with engineering education.
期刊最新文献
Engineer students’ views on competencies for sustainable development: a case from a systemic PBL environment using Q methodology ‘I think it's probably one of the most important skills we could ever know’: insights from early-career engineers on the preparedness of undergraduate degrees for the aerospace industry A system-based framework for engineering education as sustainable development What is the structure of a Challenge Based Learning project? A shortitudinal trajectory analysis of student process behaviours in an interdisciplinary engineering course Engineering professor perceptions of undergraduate engineering student stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1