Patterns of simultaneous and nonsimultaneous use of cannabis and alcohol among American Indian adolescents

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2023.2275575
Morgan A. Douglass, Linda R. Stanley, Hollis C. Karoly, Mark A. Prince, Meghan A. Crabtree, Randall C. Swaim
{"title":"Patterns of simultaneous and nonsimultaneous use of cannabis and alcohol among American Indian adolescents","authors":"Morgan A. Douglass, Linda R. Stanley, Hollis C. Karoly, Mark A. Prince, Meghan A. Crabtree, Randall C. Swaim","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2023.2275575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBackground American Indian (AI) adolescents report earlier initiation and higher rates of cannabis and alcohol use compared to their non-AI peers. Simultaneous cannabis and alcohol (SCA) use is increasingly common. A primary goal of our research was to identify profiles of cannabis and alcohol use, including SCA use, among AI adolescents using latent class analysis (LCA).Method Data from 1,673 7th–12th grade students attending 45 reservation-area schools throughout the United States who reported using alcohol and/or cannabis in the past year were used to identify the latent classes. Multinomial logistic regression analysis determined associations of sex, grade, and multiethnicity to class membership.Results A four-class solution was found: (1) SCA-Heavier Use (16.1%); (2) SCA-Lighter Use (25.2%); (3) Primarily Cannabis Use (33.3%); and (4) Primarily Alcohol Use (25.4%). Multinomial regression showed higher grade, identifying as multiethnic, and being female were associated with higher likelihood of membership in the SCA class.Conclusion AI adolescents were more likely to be classified in the Primarily Cannabis Use class as compared to all other classes. Characterizing profiles of use may help identify those engaging in risky or co-use and help researchers and clinicians better understand how AI adolescents engage with alcohol and marijuana.Keywords: American Indianadolescentslatent class analysissimultaneous usecannabisalcohol Ethics StatementAll procedures were approved by the university Institutional Review Board and by appropriate tribal research review boards, school boards, and school staff.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 Simultaneous Cannabis and Alcohol use (SCA) is also commonly referred to as simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use (SAM). However, given the negative connotations that have been historically associated with the term marijuana, we have opted to use SCA throughout this manuscript.2 Monitoring the future is a long-term epidemiological study of substance use that surveys U.S. 8th, 10th, and 12th grade adolescents.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grant # R01DA003371 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":"21 25","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2023.2275575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractBackground American Indian (AI) adolescents report earlier initiation and higher rates of cannabis and alcohol use compared to their non-AI peers. Simultaneous cannabis and alcohol (SCA) use is increasingly common. A primary goal of our research was to identify profiles of cannabis and alcohol use, including SCA use, among AI adolescents using latent class analysis (LCA).Method Data from 1,673 7th–12th grade students attending 45 reservation-area schools throughout the United States who reported using alcohol and/or cannabis in the past year were used to identify the latent classes. Multinomial logistic regression analysis determined associations of sex, grade, and multiethnicity to class membership.Results A four-class solution was found: (1) SCA-Heavier Use (16.1%); (2) SCA-Lighter Use (25.2%); (3) Primarily Cannabis Use (33.3%); and (4) Primarily Alcohol Use (25.4%). Multinomial regression showed higher grade, identifying as multiethnic, and being female were associated with higher likelihood of membership in the SCA class.Conclusion AI adolescents were more likely to be classified in the Primarily Cannabis Use class as compared to all other classes. Characterizing profiles of use may help identify those engaging in risky or co-use and help researchers and clinicians better understand how AI adolescents engage with alcohol and marijuana.Keywords: American Indianadolescentslatent class analysissimultaneous usecannabisalcohol Ethics StatementAll procedures were approved by the university Institutional Review Board and by appropriate tribal research review boards, school boards, and school staff.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 Simultaneous Cannabis and Alcohol use (SCA) is also commonly referred to as simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use (SAM). However, given the negative connotations that have been historically associated with the term marijuana, we have opted to use SCA throughout this manuscript.2 Monitoring the future is a long-term epidemiological study of substance use that surveys U.S. 8th, 10th, and 12th grade adolescents.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grant # R01DA003371 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国印第安青少年同时和非同时使用大麻和酒精的模式
与非印第安人相比,美国印第安人(AI)青少年报告更早开始使用大麻和酒精,并且使用大麻和酒精的比例更高。同时使用大麻和酒精(SCA)越来越普遍。我们研究的主要目标是使用潜在类别分析(LCA)确定AI青少年中大麻和酒精使用情况,包括SCA使用情况。方法使用来自美国45个保留区学校的1,673名7 - 12年级学生的数据,这些学生报告在过去一年中使用酒精和/或大麻来确定潜在类别。多项逻辑回归分析确定了性别、年级和多种族与班级成员的关系。结果发现四类解决方案:(1)sca -重度使用(16.1%);(2) sca -打火机使用(25.2%);(3)主要使用大麻(33.3%);(4)主要使用酒精(25.4%)。多项回归结果显示,较高的年级、多民族认同和女性与SCA类成员的可能性较高相关。结论与所有其他类别相比,AI青少年更有可能被归类为主要大麻使用类别。描述使用概况可能有助于识别那些从事高风险或共同使用的人,并帮助研究人员和临床医生更好地了解人工智能青少年如何与酒精和大麻打交道。关键词:美国印第安人青少年;阶级分析;同时使用大麻;酒精伦理声明;所有程序都得到了大学机构审查委员会和适当的部落研究审查委员会、学校董事会和学校工作人员的批准。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1同时使用大麻和酒精(SCA)通常也被称为同时使用酒精和大麻(SAM)。然而,考虑到历史上与大麻一词相关的负面含义,我们选择在整个手稿中使用SCA监测未来是一项关于药物使用的长期流行病学研究,调查了美国8年级、10年级和12年级的青少年。本研究由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的国家药物滥用研究所(NIDA)的拨款# R01DA003371支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Can ‘justified disapproval’ be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required Do older adults drink alcohol whilst taking alcohol-interactive medication? Prevalence and ten-year mortality risk: findings from the UK Whitehall II cohort study Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1