{"title":"Art Notes: Mysteries within Rembrandt's Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/log.2023.a909174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Art NotesMysteries within Rembrandt's Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee Kathryn Wehr, Managing Editor Rembrandt, Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee, Isabelle Stewart Gardner Museum This issue's cover art is the subject of a genuine unsolved mystery: it was stolen from the Isabella Steward Gardner Museum in Boston in the early morning hours of March 18, 1990, along with twelve other masterpieces by a variety of artists, including Vermeer and Degas. None has ever been recovered. In 2013 the FBI announced that it knew who was responsible, but further progress has not been made, or at least made public. The heist is commonly thought to have been the work of a Boston organized crime group. Meanwhile, Rembrandt's Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee lives on in the popular imagination in such places as the homes of movie supervillains or in books and documentaries about the theft itself, which is still considered the greatest unsolved art heist of all time. The loss to the world of this particular Rembrandt piece is great. It holds a singular place in his oeuvre as the only known oil seascape. It was painted early in his career (1633) and is an example of the Feinmaler school—of which Rembrandt was the founder in Leiden—where [End Page 168] meticulous detail and invisible brushstrokes give an illusion of reality and a smooth finish.1 His later and more familiar works of the Amsterdam period—such as The Jewish Bride (1665) or The Prodigal Son (1668)—favored the \"rough manner\" or \"painting with splotches,\" as was also said of the painter who strongly influenced Rembrandt, Titian.2 The early style amazed viewers at close proximity, while the later style, with its layers of splotches, amazed them at a distance. The story behind Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee can be found in the three synoptic Gospels: Matthew 8:23–27, Mark 4:35–41, and Luke 8:22–25. St. Mark supplies the most complete description of the storm itself: \"A violent squall came up and waves were breaking over the boat, so that it was already filling up. Jesus was in the stern, asleep on the cushion\" (4:37–38, NABRE). It is a struggle of men against nature and of fear against trust. As Michael Zell writes, The panic-stricken disciples struggle against a sudden storm, and fight to regain control of their fishing boat as a huge wave crashes over its bow, ripping the sail and drawing the craft perilously close to the rocks in the left foreground. One of the disciples succumbs to the sea's violence by vomiting over the side. Amidst this chaos, only Christ, at the right, remains calm, like the eye of the storm. Awakened by the disciples' desperate pleas for help, he rebukes them: \"Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith?\"3 This scene has been depicted by many artists throughout the centuries, though most depict Christ either still asleep or commanding the sea: \"Quiet! Be still!\" (Mk 4:39). Yet here Rembrandt paints Christ in the moment in between: awake but calm, while all around him are in panic. The Gospels of Matthew and Luke have the disciples exclaiming that they are perishing, but John Walsh suggests that Rembrandt relies upon St. Mark's inclusion of a disciple's desperate plea, \"Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?\" (Mk 4:38), as can be seen by the disciple clutching at Christ's robe contrasted with Jesus's calm look.4 The painting technique is meticulous. The ship itself is modeled [End Page 169] on a Dutch fishing boat called a hoeker and shows some influence from a similar scene by Maerten de Vos.5 A keen sailor's eye, however, will notice some inaccuracies in the way Rembrandt put the rigging and sails together.6 Walsh writes, \"These errors … have clear dramatic purposes; they emphasize the raw physical struggle; and they create the upward spiral of form, carried further by the whiplash of the loose stay, that expresses the disruptive force of nature that only God...","PeriodicalId":42128,"journal":{"name":"LOGOS-A JOURNAL OF CATHOLIC THOUGHT AND CULTURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LOGOS-A JOURNAL OF CATHOLIC THOUGHT AND CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/log.2023.a909174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Art NotesMysteries within Rembrandt's Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee Kathryn Wehr, Managing Editor Rembrandt, Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee, Isabelle Stewart Gardner Museum This issue's cover art is the subject of a genuine unsolved mystery: it was stolen from the Isabella Steward Gardner Museum in Boston in the early morning hours of March 18, 1990, along with twelve other masterpieces by a variety of artists, including Vermeer and Degas. None has ever been recovered. In 2013 the FBI announced that it knew who was responsible, but further progress has not been made, or at least made public. The heist is commonly thought to have been the work of a Boston organized crime group. Meanwhile, Rembrandt's Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee lives on in the popular imagination in such places as the homes of movie supervillains or in books and documentaries about the theft itself, which is still considered the greatest unsolved art heist of all time. The loss to the world of this particular Rembrandt piece is great. It holds a singular place in his oeuvre as the only known oil seascape. It was painted early in his career (1633) and is an example of the Feinmaler school—of which Rembrandt was the founder in Leiden—where [End Page 168] meticulous detail and invisible brushstrokes give an illusion of reality and a smooth finish.1 His later and more familiar works of the Amsterdam period—such as The Jewish Bride (1665) or The Prodigal Son (1668)—favored the "rough manner" or "painting with splotches," as was also said of the painter who strongly influenced Rembrandt, Titian.2 The early style amazed viewers at close proximity, while the later style, with its layers of splotches, amazed them at a distance. The story behind Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee can be found in the three synoptic Gospels: Matthew 8:23–27, Mark 4:35–41, and Luke 8:22–25. St. Mark supplies the most complete description of the storm itself: "A violent squall came up and waves were breaking over the boat, so that it was already filling up. Jesus was in the stern, asleep on the cushion" (4:37–38, NABRE). It is a struggle of men against nature and of fear against trust. As Michael Zell writes, The panic-stricken disciples struggle against a sudden storm, and fight to regain control of their fishing boat as a huge wave crashes over its bow, ripping the sail and drawing the craft perilously close to the rocks in the left foreground. One of the disciples succumbs to the sea's violence by vomiting over the side. Amidst this chaos, only Christ, at the right, remains calm, like the eye of the storm. Awakened by the disciples' desperate pleas for help, he rebukes them: "Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith?"3 This scene has been depicted by many artists throughout the centuries, though most depict Christ either still asleep or commanding the sea: "Quiet! Be still!" (Mk 4:39). Yet here Rembrandt paints Christ in the moment in between: awake but calm, while all around him are in panic. The Gospels of Matthew and Luke have the disciples exclaiming that they are perishing, but John Walsh suggests that Rembrandt relies upon St. Mark's inclusion of a disciple's desperate plea, "Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?" (Mk 4:38), as can be seen by the disciple clutching at Christ's robe contrasted with Jesus's calm look.4 The painting technique is meticulous. The ship itself is modeled [End Page 169] on a Dutch fishing boat called a hoeker and shows some influence from a similar scene by Maerten de Vos.5 A keen sailor's eye, however, will notice some inaccuracies in the way Rembrandt put the rigging and sails together.6 Walsh writes, "These errors … have clear dramatic purposes; they emphasize the raw physical struggle; and they create the upward spiral of form, carried further by the whiplash of the loose stay, that expresses the disruptive force of nature that only God...
这一期的封面艺术是一个真正未解之谜的主题:它于1990年3月18日凌晨在波士顿的伊莎贝拉·斯图尔特·加德纳博物馆被盗,与此同时被盗的还有其他12幅艺术家的杰作,包括维米尔和德加。没有一个被找到。2013年,美国联邦调查局(FBI)宣布,它知道谁应该对此负责,但没有取得进一步进展,或者至少没有公布。这起抢劫案被普遍认为是波士顿一个有组织犯罪集团所为。与此同时,伦勃朗的《加利利海风暴中的基督》(Christ in the Storm in the Sea of Galilee)仍然存在于大众的想象中,比如电影中超级反派的家中,或者是关于盗窃案本身的书籍和纪录片,这仍然被认为是有史以来最大的未解艺术盗窃案。伦勃朗的这幅作品对世界的损失是巨大的。它在他的全部作品中占有独特的地位,是唯一已知的油画海景。这幅画是伦勃朗创作生涯早期(1633年)的作品,是芬玛勒画派(Feinmaler school)的典范,伦勃朗是莱顿的创始人。在芬玛勒画派中,一丝不苟的细节和看不见的笔触给人一种现实的幻觉和流畅的画面感他后来和更熟悉的阿姆斯特丹时期的作品,如《犹太新娘》(1665)或《浪子回头》(1668),都倾向于“粗糙的方式”或“带有斑点的绘画”,正如对伦勃朗产生强烈影响的画家提香所说的那样。早期的风格让近距离观看的人感到惊讶,而后来的风格则以其层层相接的斑点让他们感到惊讶。基督在加利利海的风暴中背后的故事可以在三本对观福音书中找到:马太福音8:23-27,马可福音4:35-41和路加福音8:22-25。圣马可提供了对风暴本身最完整的描述:“一阵猛烈的狂风袭来,海浪冲击着船,船已经满了水。耶稣在船尾,靠在船上的坐垫上睡觉”(4:37-38)。这是人类与自然的斗争,是恐惧与信任的斗争。正如迈克尔·泽尔(Michael Zell)所写的那样,惊慌失措的门徒们与突如其来的风暴作斗争,并努力重新控制他们的渔船,因为一个巨大的波浪撞击了船头,撕裂了船帆,把船拉到左边前景中的岩石附近。其中一个弟子屈服于海的暴力,呕吐在一边。在这混乱中,只有基督,在右边,保持平静,像风暴的眼睛。他被门徒绝望的求助唤醒,责备他们说:“小信心的人哪,你们为什么胆怯呢?”几个世纪以来,许多艺术家都描绘了这一场景,尽管大多数艺术家描绘的是耶稣要么还在睡觉,要么在指挥大海:“安静!还是!”(可4:39)。然而,伦勃朗在这幅画中描绘了中间的基督:清醒但平静,而他周围的人都处于恐慌之中。在《马太福音》和《路加福音》中,门徒们呼喊着他们正在灭亡,但约翰·沃尔什认为伦勃朗依赖于圣马可中一个门徒绝望的恳求,“老师,你不关心我们正在灭亡吗?”(可4:38),从门徒紧紧抓住基督的袍子与耶稣平静的表情形成对比可以看出绘画手法十分细致。这艘船本身是以一艘被称为hoeker的荷兰渔船为模型的,并受到了Maerten de vos类似场景的影响。然而,一个敏锐的水手的眼睛会注意到伦勃朗将索具和帆放在一起的方式中的一些不准确之处沃尔什写道:“这些错误……有着明显的戏剧性目的;他们强调原始的身体斗争;它们创造了一个向上的螺旋形,由松散的支柱的鞭打进一步推动,表达了自然的破坏性力量,只有上帝……
期刊介绍:
A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture is an interdisciplinary quarterly committed to exploring the beauty, truth, and vitality of Christianity, particularly as it is rooted in and shaped by Catholicism. We seek a readership that extends beyond the academy, and publish articles on literature, philosophy, theology, history, the natural and social sciences, art, music, public policy, and the professions. Logos is published under the auspices of the Center for Catholic Studies at the University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota.