Jay DeFeo, Encore

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ART ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/727628
Suzanne Hudson
{"title":"Jay DeFeo, Encore","authors":"Suzanne Hudson","doi":"10.1086/727628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that Bay Area artist Jay DeFeo’s overidentification with The Rose (1958–66), has resulted in a historiography that consistently—and as I claim, wrongly—frames her career thereafter in terms of aftermath. Against narratives of “before and after” upheld by writers on DeFeo, this essay maintains that The Rose represents neither a consummation nor a cleavage; rather, it came to stand for DeFeo for incipient possibility, encompassing and then generating a lexicon of forms. The still larger stakes involve the role collections intended for public archives play in private lives. The Archives of American Art’s interest in DeFeo beginning in 1974 arguably accelerated her imaging of futurity, encouraging not just new work but her work’s preservation—alongside that of related papers, diaries, records, and oral histories—in anticipation of future audiences who might still receive it.","PeriodicalId":41204,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay argues that Bay Area artist Jay DeFeo’s overidentification with The Rose (1958–66), has resulted in a historiography that consistently—and as I claim, wrongly—frames her career thereafter in terms of aftermath. Against narratives of “before and after” upheld by writers on DeFeo, this essay maintains that The Rose represents neither a consummation nor a cleavage; rather, it came to stand for DeFeo for incipient possibility, encompassing and then generating a lexicon of forms. The still larger stakes involve the role collections intended for public archives play in private lives. The Archives of American Art’s interest in DeFeo beginning in 1974 arguably accelerated her imaging of futurity, encouraging not just new work but her work’s preservation—alongside that of related papers, diaries, records, and oral histories—in anticipation of future audiences who might still receive it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jay DeFeo,再次
本文认为,湾区艺术家杰伊·德菲奥(Jay DeFeo)对《玫瑰》(1958-66)的过度认同,导致了一种历史编纂方法,这种方法始终如一地——正如我所说的那样,错误地——从后果的角度来定义她此后的职业生涯。本文反对德菲奥作家主张的“前后”叙事,认为《玫瑰》既不代表圆满,也不代表分裂;相反,它代表了defo,代表了早期的可能性,包含并产生了一个形式词典。更大的利害关系涉及公共档案收藏在私人生活中所扮演的角色。美国艺术档案馆从1974年开始对德菲奥产生兴趣,可以说加速了她对未来的想象,不仅鼓励了她的新作品,还鼓励了她的作品的保存——与相关的论文、日记、记录和口述历史一起——以期待未来的观众可能仍然会收到它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Being There: The Singularity of Oral History Front Matter Albert Murray’s Approach to Oral Art History: An Epistolary Exploration About the Archives of American Art Oral History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1