{"title":"Narrative Mourning: Death and Its Relics in the Eighteenth-Century British Novel by Kathleen M. Oliver (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.a909471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Narrative Mourning: Death and Its Relics in the Eighteenth-Century British Novel by Kathleen M. Oliver Mark Fulk Kathleen M. Oliver, Narrative Mourning: Death and Its Relics in the Eighteenth-Century British Novel ( Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell Univ. Press, 2020). Pp. 207; 7 b/w illus. $34.95 paper, $120.00 cloth. Studies such as Thomas W. Laqueur's The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains (2015) and Phillipe Ariès's The Hour of Our Death: The Classic History of Western Attitudes Toward Death over the Last One Thousand Years (1981) have provoked cultural reappraisals of our changing relation to death and dying in the West. Kathleen M. Oliver's book picks up the challenge of these studies, particularly relating them to the changing theories and practice of death in the eighteenth century as read through major and minor novels of the period. Oliver's analysis centers on close readings of Samuel Richardson's Clarissa (1748) and The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753); Sarah Fielding's The Adventures of David Simple (1744), Familiar Letters between the Principal Character in David Simple (1747), and Volume the Last (1753); Henry Mackenzie's The Man of Feeling (1771); and Ann Radcliffe's The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794). Building her study around the changing cultural dynamics concerning death between 1748 and 1794, Oliver argues that the eighteenth century evinces \"a world of epistemological uncertainty,\" as ideas of an embodied soul transform into the view of a \"consciousness that transcends time and place and body\" (161). Oliver's study uses the notion of relics and relicts as the centerpiece to her understanding of the changing dynamics around death in these novels. The word \"relic\" evokes the medieval relic, which was a physical piece from a saint that was expected to carry holy power, including the power of healing, and became an important emblem of a system of religious power. Oliver uses the term \"relict\" to denote physical remnants of the dead more generally; in practice, the distinction between relict and relic is often elided. In her study of the eighteenth century, the relic/relict moves from a remnant that carries with it power from the decedent to a thing that merely invokes the memory of the person who is gone. Oliver traces the change she sees from relic/relicts as objects that continue to embody the dead [End Page 149] to objects merely of remembrance in the novel to John Locke's arguments in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) that the soul is not necessarily connected to the body and can exist apart from it. Locke's formulations take time to displace older ideas of the soul suffusing the body and its remnants, becoming instead represented by the ever-present ghosts of the gothic novel. Clarissa represents the earliest manifestation of the idea of the relic/relict, being a text that references a time when these had some power and prescience that could shape the lives of the living. While they may not possess ghostly powers like saints' relics, Clarissa's bequeathed rings (some with her hair and some without) become an equivalence to her moral judgment as well as a way of promising her continuing presence in her beloveds' lives after her death. Oliver traces the history of hair rings and shows their shifting meaning in the time of Richardson's writing, demonstrating that they did indeed exist somewhere between relics/relicts as understood in the Middle Ages and relics/relicts as mere symbols for remembrance. Oliver's strongest, most insightful readings concern the David Simple novels as well as Mysteries of Udolpho. Although the novel was written chronologically later, Oliver's analysis of Udolpho is placed earlier in her study as one of two framing texts, the other being Clarissa. Her study highlights two aspects of the changing notion of the material culture surrounding death: portraits and miniatures on the one hand, and waxen transi on the other. Oliver offers a sophisticated history of the use of the miniature, especially as a gift that then becomes a remnant of the dead themselves. The placement of the miniature close to the heart of the one who...","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a909471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewed by: Narrative Mourning: Death and Its Relics in the Eighteenth-Century British Novel by Kathleen M. Oliver Mark Fulk Kathleen M. Oliver, Narrative Mourning: Death and Its Relics in the Eighteenth-Century British Novel ( Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell Univ. Press, 2020). Pp. 207; 7 b/w illus. $34.95 paper, $120.00 cloth. Studies such as Thomas W. Laqueur's The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains (2015) and Phillipe Ariès's The Hour of Our Death: The Classic History of Western Attitudes Toward Death over the Last One Thousand Years (1981) have provoked cultural reappraisals of our changing relation to death and dying in the West. Kathleen M. Oliver's book picks up the challenge of these studies, particularly relating them to the changing theories and practice of death in the eighteenth century as read through major and minor novels of the period. Oliver's analysis centers on close readings of Samuel Richardson's Clarissa (1748) and The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753); Sarah Fielding's The Adventures of David Simple (1744), Familiar Letters between the Principal Character in David Simple (1747), and Volume the Last (1753); Henry Mackenzie's The Man of Feeling (1771); and Ann Radcliffe's The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794). Building her study around the changing cultural dynamics concerning death between 1748 and 1794, Oliver argues that the eighteenth century evinces "a world of epistemological uncertainty," as ideas of an embodied soul transform into the view of a "consciousness that transcends time and place and body" (161). Oliver's study uses the notion of relics and relicts as the centerpiece to her understanding of the changing dynamics around death in these novels. The word "relic" evokes the medieval relic, which was a physical piece from a saint that was expected to carry holy power, including the power of healing, and became an important emblem of a system of religious power. Oliver uses the term "relict" to denote physical remnants of the dead more generally; in practice, the distinction between relict and relic is often elided. In her study of the eighteenth century, the relic/relict moves from a remnant that carries with it power from the decedent to a thing that merely invokes the memory of the person who is gone. Oliver traces the change she sees from relic/relicts as objects that continue to embody the dead [End Page 149] to objects merely of remembrance in the novel to John Locke's arguments in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) that the soul is not necessarily connected to the body and can exist apart from it. Locke's formulations take time to displace older ideas of the soul suffusing the body and its remnants, becoming instead represented by the ever-present ghosts of the gothic novel. Clarissa represents the earliest manifestation of the idea of the relic/relict, being a text that references a time when these had some power and prescience that could shape the lives of the living. While they may not possess ghostly powers like saints' relics, Clarissa's bequeathed rings (some with her hair and some without) become an equivalence to her moral judgment as well as a way of promising her continuing presence in her beloveds' lives after her death. Oliver traces the history of hair rings and shows their shifting meaning in the time of Richardson's writing, demonstrating that they did indeed exist somewhere between relics/relicts as understood in the Middle Ages and relics/relicts as mere symbols for remembrance. Oliver's strongest, most insightful readings concern the David Simple novels as well as Mysteries of Udolpho. Although the novel was written chronologically later, Oliver's analysis of Udolpho is placed earlier in her study as one of two framing texts, the other being Clarissa. Her study highlights two aspects of the changing notion of the material culture surrounding death: portraits and miniatures on the one hand, and waxen transi on the other. Oliver offers a sophisticated history of the use of the miniature, especially as a gift that then becomes a remnant of the dead themselves. The placement of the miniature close to the heart of the one who...
由:叙事哀悼:死亡及其遗迹在十八世纪英国小说凯瑟琳M.奥利弗马克富尔克凯瑟琳M.奥利弗,叙事哀悼:死亡及其遗迹在十八世纪英国小说(刘易斯堡,宾夕法尼亚州:巴克内尔大学出版社,2020)。页。207;7桶/桶。纸34.95美元,布120.00美元。托马斯·w·拉克尔的《死者的工作:人类遗骸的文化史》(2015)和菲利普·阿里斯的《我们死亡的时刻:过去一千年来西方死亡态度的经典历史》(1981)等研究,引发了我们对西方不断变化的死亡和死亡关系的文化重新评估。凯瑟琳·m·奥利弗(Kathleen M. Oliver)的书接受了这些研究的挑战,特别是将它们与18世纪主要和次要小说中不断变化的死亡理论和实践联系起来。奥利弗的分析集中在仔细阅读塞缪尔·理查森的《克拉丽莎》(1748)和《查尔斯·格兰迪森爵士的历史》(1753)上;莎拉·菲尔丁的《大卫·Simple历险记》(1744)、《大卫·Simple》主要人物之间的熟悉信件》(1747)和《最后一卷》(1753);亨利·麦肯齐的《有感情的人》(1771);以及安·拉德克利夫的《乌道尔弗之谜》(1794)。奥利弗围绕着1748年至1794年间关于死亡的不断变化的文化动态展开了她的研究,她认为,18世纪证明了“一个认识论不确定性的世界”,体现灵魂的观念转变为“超越时间、地点和身体的意识”的观点(161)。奥利弗的研究将遗物和遗存的概念作为她理解这些小说中围绕死亡的变化动态的核心。“遗物”这个词让人联想到中世纪的遗物,它是来自圣人的实物,被认为具有神圣的力量,包括治愈的力量,并成为宗教权力体系的重要象征。奥利弗用“遗留物”这个词来泛指死者的身体残余物;在实践中,遗留物和遗物之间的区别常常被忽略。在她对十八世纪的研究中,遗物/遗留物从一个承载着来自死者的权力的遗迹变成了一个仅仅唤起对逝者记忆的东西。奥利弗追溯了她所看到的变化,从遗物/遗存作为继续体现死者的物体(End Page 149)到小说中仅仅是纪念的物体,再到约翰·洛克在《关于人类理解的文章》(1689)中的论点,即灵魂不一定与身体相连,可以脱离身体而存在。洛克的构思需要时间来取代灵魂弥漫于身体及其残余物的旧观念,取而代之的是由哥特式小说中永远存在的鬼魂来代表。《克拉丽莎》代表了“遗物/遗存”概念的最早表现形式,作为一篇文章,它引用了一个时代,当这些人有一些力量和先见之明,可以塑造活着的人的生活。虽然它们可能不像圣徒的遗物那样拥有幽灵般的力量,但克拉丽莎的遗赠戒指(有些带有她的头发,有些没有)成为她道德判断的等同物,也是一种承诺她死后继续存在于她所爱的人的生活中的方式。奥利弗追溯了发环的历史,并展示了它们在理查森写作时期的意义变化,表明它们确实存在于中世纪所理解的遗迹/遗迹和仅仅作为纪念符号的遗迹/遗迹之间。奥利弗最深刻、最有见地的阅读涉及《大卫·Simple》系列小说和《乌道尔福之谜》。虽然这部小说是按时间顺序写的较晚,但奥利弗对乌多尔弗的分析在她的研究中被放在较早的位置,作为两个框架文本之一,另一个是克拉丽莎。她的研究突出了围绕死亡的物质文化观念变化的两个方面:一方面是肖像和微缩画,另一方面是蜡像。奥利弗提供了一个复杂的历史使用的微型,特别是作为礼物,然后成为一个残余的死者自己。把这幅微型画放在一个人的心脏附近……
期刊介绍:
As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.