Architecture and Urbanism in Viceregal Mexico: Puebla de los Ángeles, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries by Juan Luis Burke (review)

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/ecs.2023.a909468
{"title":"Architecture and Urbanism in Viceregal Mexico: Puebla de los Ángeles, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries by Juan Luis Burke (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.a909468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Architecture and Urbanism in Viceregal Mexico: Puebla de los Ángeles, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries by Juan Luis Burke Luis J. Gordo Peláez Juan Luis Burke, Architecture and Urbanism in Viceregal Mexico: Puebla de los Ángeles, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries ( New York: Routledge, 2021). Pp. 232; 50 b/w illus. $170.00 cloth, $48.95 paper. The opening salvo of this study dismantles the myth that traditionally fashioned the Mexican city of Puebla as the quintessential Spanish colonial settlement devoid of Indigenous contribution to its urban design and built form. Architectural historian Juan Luis Burke argues that the Indigenous legacy and presence were deeply ingrained in early modern Puebla from the very conceptualization of the city. Through five chapters, the architectural history of New Spain's second largest city after the viceregal capital is scrutinized in a chronological sequence, [End Page 141] from its founding in 1531 to the baroque transformation of its built environment in the 1700s. The book starts with Puebla's founding and settlement, intended as a Spanish agrarian community embedded in a densely populated Indigenous land. As with other Spanish colonial urban experiments, Puebla emerged as an enterprise in which the state and the church joined forces. The negotiated nature of its early history is stressed in regard to its strategic location, its multiethnic population, and the roots and development of its urban form. By revisiting primary city accounts and historiography on early colonial Mexico and urban design, Puebla's incipient grid model is reassessed in light of the region's Indigenous presence and the pre-Hispanic planning and building traditions. Burke reevaluates the case of pre-Hispanic Cholula, one of the leading Indigenous centers in the area prior to the Spanish colonization, where urban form (along with enduring cultural practices) might have exerted some influence in the design and physical structure of colonial Puebla. A review of the history of royal instructions, urban ideals, and experiences also draws attention to the Franciscan missionaries, who were receptive to medieval theories on urban planning and instrumental in the city's identification with the heavenly Jerusalem, a move that resonated with similar evocations in other colonial cities. In Puebla, this was reinforced by an architectural Via Crucis that reimagined the Mexican city as Jerusalem. The dozen preserved chapel stations and their topographical reenactment comprise a fairly unknown and almost complete architectural ensemble that is here brought to light. Next, Burke traces the reception of Renaissance urban theory and classicizing forms in late sixteenth-century Puebla by delving into the vibrant and sprawling city's built environment, the patrons and architects involved in its shaping, and the images and books that circulated in this Novohispanic region. A \"distinctive regional architectural tradition\" is argued for Puebla, one that renders obsolete a Eurocentric reading of Renaissance architecture in the Ibero-American world (82). Instead, the early colonial artistic forms and cultural practices are rooted in a transatlantic context of exchange and transformation that remains understudied in its building history. In Puebla, Indigenous craftsmanship and labor proved essential in the construction of the colonial city, where native builders and masons enjoyed prerogatives that sharply differentiated the practice of the building profession from that of Mexico City. The poblano enthusiasm for a classicizing aesthetic is explored in other visual, documentary, and built forms. Of particular interest is the case of Andalusian Luis Lagarto, whose biblical miniatures denote his fluency with this Italianate vocabulary and a receptive clientele to a language that came to signify the imperial agenda of the Spanish monarchy and its viceregal institutions. The book collections of the Jesuit college and the Palafoxiana libraries further enrich the discussion. What intrigues Burke are the annotations in two sixteenth-century editions of Vitruvius's architectural treatise, traces left by informed individuals with building experience and familiarity with classical architectural orders. This handwritten evidence indicates that the unknown readers were interested in pressing matters for city alarifes (chief architects), such as water technology and infrastructures. Despite its mutilated state today, the Casa del Deán, the residence of the head of the cathedral chapter, is also a remarkable example of the classical vocabularies taking root. The designer of the house remains unidentified...","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a909468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Architecture and Urbanism in Viceregal Mexico: Puebla de los Ángeles, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries by Juan Luis Burke Luis J. Gordo Peláez Juan Luis Burke, Architecture and Urbanism in Viceregal Mexico: Puebla de los Ángeles, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries ( New York: Routledge, 2021). Pp. 232; 50 b/w illus. $170.00 cloth, $48.95 paper. The opening salvo of this study dismantles the myth that traditionally fashioned the Mexican city of Puebla as the quintessential Spanish colonial settlement devoid of Indigenous contribution to its urban design and built form. Architectural historian Juan Luis Burke argues that the Indigenous legacy and presence were deeply ingrained in early modern Puebla from the very conceptualization of the city. Through five chapters, the architectural history of New Spain's second largest city after the viceregal capital is scrutinized in a chronological sequence, [End Page 141] from its founding in 1531 to the baroque transformation of its built environment in the 1700s. The book starts with Puebla's founding and settlement, intended as a Spanish agrarian community embedded in a densely populated Indigenous land. As with other Spanish colonial urban experiments, Puebla emerged as an enterprise in which the state and the church joined forces. The negotiated nature of its early history is stressed in regard to its strategic location, its multiethnic population, and the roots and development of its urban form. By revisiting primary city accounts and historiography on early colonial Mexico and urban design, Puebla's incipient grid model is reassessed in light of the region's Indigenous presence and the pre-Hispanic planning and building traditions. Burke reevaluates the case of pre-Hispanic Cholula, one of the leading Indigenous centers in the area prior to the Spanish colonization, where urban form (along with enduring cultural practices) might have exerted some influence in the design and physical structure of colonial Puebla. A review of the history of royal instructions, urban ideals, and experiences also draws attention to the Franciscan missionaries, who were receptive to medieval theories on urban planning and instrumental in the city's identification with the heavenly Jerusalem, a move that resonated with similar evocations in other colonial cities. In Puebla, this was reinforced by an architectural Via Crucis that reimagined the Mexican city as Jerusalem. The dozen preserved chapel stations and their topographical reenactment comprise a fairly unknown and almost complete architectural ensemble that is here brought to light. Next, Burke traces the reception of Renaissance urban theory and classicizing forms in late sixteenth-century Puebla by delving into the vibrant and sprawling city's built environment, the patrons and architects involved in its shaping, and the images and books that circulated in this Novohispanic region. A "distinctive regional architectural tradition" is argued for Puebla, one that renders obsolete a Eurocentric reading of Renaissance architecture in the Ibero-American world (82). Instead, the early colonial artistic forms and cultural practices are rooted in a transatlantic context of exchange and transformation that remains understudied in its building history. In Puebla, Indigenous craftsmanship and labor proved essential in the construction of the colonial city, where native builders and masons enjoyed prerogatives that sharply differentiated the practice of the building profession from that of Mexico City. The poblano enthusiasm for a classicizing aesthetic is explored in other visual, documentary, and built forms. Of particular interest is the case of Andalusian Luis Lagarto, whose biblical miniatures denote his fluency with this Italianate vocabulary and a receptive clientele to a language that came to signify the imperial agenda of the Spanish monarchy and its viceregal institutions. The book collections of the Jesuit college and the Palafoxiana libraries further enrich the discussion. What intrigues Burke are the annotations in two sixteenth-century editions of Vitruvius's architectural treatise, traces left by informed individuals with building experience and familiarity with classical architectural orders. This handwritten evidence indicates that the unknown readers were interested in pressing matters for city alarifes (chief architects), such as water technology and infrastructures. Despite its mutilated state today, the Casa del Deán, the residence of the head of the cathedral chapter, is also a remarkable example of the classical vocabularies taking root. The designer of the house remains unidentified...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥总督辖区的建筑和城市主义:普埃布拉德洛斯Ángeles, 16至18世纪,作者:胡安·路易斯·伯克(回顾)
由:建筑和城市主义在墨西哥总督:普埃布拉德洛斯Ángeles, 16至18世纪由胡安·路易斯·伯克路易斯·j·戈多Peláez胡安·路易斯·伯克,建筑和城市主义在墨西哥总督:普埃布拉德洛斯Ángeles, 16至18世纪(纽约:Routledge, 2021年)。页。232;50桶/水。布170.00美元,纸48.95美元。本研究的开篇就打破了传统上将墨西哥普埃布拉市塑造成典型的西班牙殖民定居点的神话,这种神话缺乏土著对其城市设计和建筑形式的贡献。建筑历史学家Juan Luis Burke认为,从城市的概念化开始,土著遗产和存在就深深植根于普埃布拉的早期现代。通过五个章节,新西班牙仅次于总督首都的第二大城市的建筑史按时间顺序进行了仔细审查,从1531年的建立到18世纪建筑环境的巴洛克式转变。这本书从普埃布拉的建立和定居开始,作为一个西班牙农业社区嵌入人口稠密的土著土地。与其他西班牙殖民地的城市实验一样,普埃布拉成为一个国家和教会联合起来的企业。在其战略位置、多民族人口以及城市形式的根源和发展方面,强调了其早期历史的谈判性质。通过回顾早期殖民时期墨西哥和城市设计的主要城市记录和史学,根据该地区的土著居民和前西班牙人的规划和建筑传统,重新评估了普埃布拉的早期网格模型。在西班牙殖民之前,乔卢拉是该地区主要的土著中心之一,在那里,城市形式(以及持久的文化习俗)可能对殖民地普埃布拉的设计和物理结构产生了一些影响。回顾皇家指示、城市理想和经验的历史,也会注意到方济各会传教士,他们接受中世纪的城市规划理论,并在城市与天堂耶路撒冷的认同中发挥了重要作用,这一举动与其他殖民城市产生了类似的共鸣。在普埃布拉(Puebla),建筑上的十字大道(Via Crucis)强化了这一点,将墨西哥城市重新想象为耶路撒冷。十几个保存完好的教堂站和它们的地形再现构成了一个相当不为人知的几乎完整的建筑整体,在这里被曝光。接下来,伯克追溯了16世纪晚期普埃布拉对文艺复兴时期城市理论和经典形式的接受,通过深入研究充满活力和扩张的城市建筑环境,参与其塑造的赞助人和建筑师,以及在这个新西班牙地区传播的图像和书籍。一个“独特的区域建筑传统”被认为是普埃布拉,一个使过时的欧洲中心阅读文艺复兴时期的建筑在伊比利亚-美洲世界(82)。相反,早期殖民时期的艺术形式和文化实践植根于跨大西洋的交流和变革背景,这在其建筑史上仍未得到充分研究。在普埃布拉(Puebla),当地的工艺和劳动力在殖民城市的建设中被证明是必不可少的,在那里,当地的建筑商和泥瓦匠享有与墨西哥城截然不同的建筑专业的特权。波布拉诺对古典美学的热情在其他视觉、纪录片和建筑形式中得到了探索。特别令人感兴趣的是安达卢西亚人路易斯·拉加托(Luis Lagarto)的例子,他的圣经微缩画表明他对意大利语词汇的流利,以及对一种语言的接受能力,这种语言后来象征着西班牙君主制及其总督机构的帝国议程。耶稣会学院和palafxiana图书馆的藏书进一步丰富了讨论。伯克感兴趣的是维特鲁威建筑专著的两个16世纪版本中的注释,这些注释是由有建筑经验和熟悉古典建筑秩序的知情人士留下的。这些手写的证据表明,未知的读者对城市的紧急事项(首席建筑师)很感兴趣,比如水技术和基础设施。尽管它今天的状态残破不堪,Casa del Deán,大教堂分会负责人的住所,也是古典词汇扎根的一个显著例子。这所房子的设计师身份仍然不明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.
期刊最新文献
Polemics, Literature, and Knowledge in Eighteenth-Century Mexico: A New World for the Republic of Letters by José Francisco Robles (review) The New Cambridge Companion to Samuel Johnson ed. by Greg Clingham (review) Prince Eugene of Savoy: A Genius for War Against Louis XIV and the Ottoman Empire by James Falkner, and: Charles XII's Karoliners, Vol.1: Swedish Infantry and Artillery of the Great Northern War 1700–1721 by Sergey Shamenkov (review) The Temple of Fame and Friendship: Portraits, Music, and History in the C. P. E. Bach Circle by Annette Richards (review) Pathologies of Motion: Historical Thinking in Medicine, Aesthetics, and Poetics by Kevis Goodman (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1