Individual strategies for mitigating health risk under high epidemiological hazard (review of foreign studies)

S.А. Sudin
{"title":"Individual strategies for mitigating health risk under high epidemiological hazard (review of foreign studies)","authors":"S.А. Sudin","doi":"10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.18.eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic created elevated risks for life and health of overwhelming majority of people all over the world. The situation called for global restructuring of activities performed by social institutions as well as for adaptation of people’s routine behaviors to this new reality. Common people faced a serious challenge of selecting an optimal self-preservation model that would allow achieving the maximum possible mitigation of health risks. This review covers empirical foreign studies with their focus on people’s health-related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic with its aim being to identify different types of individual strategies for health risk mitigation. During the pandemic, protective behavior was influenced by social, cultural, sociodemographic, and individual and personality-related factors. Effects of micro-factors (age or education) could be different depending on a country. High healthcare literacy was a factor of selecting a protective behavior model regardless of any other characteristics. We can spot out three basic strategies for mitigating health risks under high epidemiological hazard: 1) a maximum protection strategy involving adherence to most medical recommendations on prevention of the coronavirus infection; 2) a dominating protection strategy that involves adherence to some basic recommendations (face mask wearing, frequent hand washing, and self-isolation); 3) a mixed strategy that includes periodical adherence to some recommendation on prevention of the infection, on the one hand, and some risky behaviors, on the other hand. Behavior strategies aimed at mental health protection are various and include, for example, those that are oriented at social networks as much as only possible (a strategy involving search for emotional support or an attempt to keep social contacts), as well as isolation strategies and deviant strategies. Some studies covered in the review suggest ways to consider peculiarities of individual and family behavior during the pandemics when solving tasks related to risks of infections spread in future.","PeriodicalId":12945,"journal":{"name":"Health Risk Analysis","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.18.eng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic created elevated risks for life and health of overwhelming majority of people all over the world. The situation called for global restructuring of activities performed by social institutions as well as for adaptation of people’s routine behaviors to this new reality. Common people faced a serious challenge of selecting an optimal self-preservation model that would allow achieving the maximum possible mitigation of health risks. This review covers empirical foreign studies with their focus on people’s health-related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic with its aim being to identify different types of individual strategies for health risk mitigation. During the pandemic, protective behavior was influenced by social, cultural, sociodemographic, and individual and personality-related factors. Effects of micro-factors (age or education) could be different depending on a country. High healthcare literacy was a factor of selecting a protective behavior model regardless of any other characteristics. We can spot out three basic strategies for mitigating health risks under high epidemiological hazard: 1) a maximum protection strategy involving adherence to most medical recommendations on prevention of the coronavirus infection; 2) a dominating protection strategy that involves adherence to some basic recommendations (face mask wearing, frequent hand washing, and self-isolation); 3) a mixed strategy that includes periodical adherence to some recommendation on prevention of the infection, on the one hand, and some risky behaviors, on the other hand. Behavior strategies aimed at mental health protection are various and include, for example, those that are oriented at social networks as much as only possible (a strategy involving search for emotional support or an attempt to keep social contacts), as well as isolation strategies and deviant strategies. Some studies covered in the review suggest ways to consider peculiarities of individual and family behavior during the pandemics when solving tasks related to risks of infections spread in future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高流行病学危害下减轻健康风险的个别战略(审查国外研究)
2019冠状病毒病大流行给全世界绝大多数人的生命和健康带来了更高的风险。这种情况要求在全球范围内调整社会机构的活动,并使人们的日常行为适应这种新的现实。普通人面临着一个严峻的挑战,即选择一种最佳的自我保护模式,以最大限度地减轻健康风险。本文综述了国外的实证研究,重点关注COVID-19大流行期间人们的健康相关行为,目的是确定不同类型的个体健康风险缓解策略。在大流行期间,保护行为受到社会、文化、社会人口学以及个人和个性相关因素的影响。微观因素(年龄或教育)的影响可能因国家而异。无论其他特征如何,高保健素养是选择保护性行为模式的一个因素。我们可以找出在高流行病学危害下减轻健康风险的三个基本策略:1)最大限度地保护策略,包括遵守预防冠状病毒感染的大多数医疗建议;2)主要的保护策略,包括遵守一些基本建议(戴口罩、勤洗手和自我隔离);3)一种混合策略,一方面定期遵守一些预防感染的建议,另一方面采取一些危险行为。旨在保护精神健康的行为策略多种多样,例如,包括尽可能以社会网络为导向的策略(一种涉及寻求情感支持或试图保持社会联系的策略),以及孤立策略和越轨策略。综述中涉及的一些研究建议,在解决与未来感染传播风险相关的任务时,应考虑大流行期间个人和家庭行为的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Risk Analysis
Health Risk Analysis Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of reference doses of chemicals introduced with drinking water Extract of european spruce strobiles as a promising tool to minimize the risks of inflammation On possible practical applications of the gut microbiome research in the prevention, diagnosis, assessment of, and treatment modification for multiple sclerosis in patients from risk groups Risk of perinatal mortality among the offspring of workers employed at production with radiation hazards Some proposals on regulation of highly hazardous chemicals in articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1