Cities of the Dead as Global History

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/ecs.2023.a909448
Kathleen Wilson
{"title":"Cities of the Dead as Global History","authors":"Kathleen Wilson","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.a909448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities of the Dead as Global History Kathleen Wilson (bio) Joseph Roach's famously generative study, Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance (1996), founded a new paradigm for performance, cultural, and historical studies, one that remains extravagantly transgressive of national, imperial, and hemispheric boundaries and yet astonishingly effective in materializing quotidian and unexpected demographic and cultural flows. (Calling this work \"interdisciplinary\" is quaint, as Eric Lott notes on the dustjacket.)1 That paradigm is circum-Atlantic performance, a tag that beckons to both its trans-hemispheric reach and mobility, triangulating between four continents (Europe, Africa, and the Americas), and to the many beings, practices, and lifeways, human and nonhuman, that constituted its hydrographical conditions of possibility. Performance in Roach's hands becomes a way of interrogating, and learning from, the messiness of cultural confrontations to see how popular and elite practices took shape in relation to each other, \"repetitions with a difference\" that consolidated settlements on other peoples' lands and created new kinds of societies in turn.2 From Thomas Betterton's funeral to King Zulu's Mardi Gras processions, song, speech, dance, and other bodily arts become through Roach's intercultural analysis a new kind of archive, marked by modes of kinesthetic communication and exchange whereby, to quote Victor Turner, \"the ethnographies, literatures, ritual and theatrical traditions of the world\" serve as the basis for \"a new transcultural communicative synthesis through performance,\" a kind of global history of meaning-making.3 For this cultural and ethnohistorian of eighteenth-century Britain and the empire, Roach's study was quite simply the most important to appear on performance in the twentieth century, and since. Bringing together older anthropological and post-structural models with newer performance studies approaches, it helped reshape the interpretive terrain to which cultural and ethnohistorians of empire must attend. This terrain now includes the multiplicities of performances that clashed on the littorals of contested domains and that sometimes even vanquished brutality to modelnew ways of being and knowing.4 [End Page 5] The circum-Atlantic conjured by Cities of the Dead revealed an oceanic interculture marked by webs of slavery, forced labor, domination, and subordination that unfolded on four continents thanks to a single ocean and singular human trade, creating a new kind of geopolitical entity that reshaped ideas about transnational and transhemispheric history. The persistence of multiplicity in its intercultural spaces unmoored queries about origin from those merely of the nation-state and its supposedly indomitable will, and directed them instead to the stories of the struggles and triumphs of peoples who survived the murderous circuits of mercantile capitalism—and those who did not. Performance provides a unique perspective on these travails and triumphs, as memory, history, auto-ethnography, and theatrical skills were all called upon—both then and now—to make sense of this new environment where the \"forgotten but not gone\" continued to register their presence despite all efforts to the contrary, creating new identities and futures that hinged upon their performances of memory, loss, and replacement.5 I was broaching the intercultural complexities of the eighteenth-century British Empire when I first came upon Roach's book in 1998. Scholars had begun to confront the \"white Atlantic\" of Bernard Bailyn and his followers with Black, Red, and Green Atlantics more subversive of nation-state pieties, and to pitch new ways to think about cultural intermixture through the lenses of the Atlantic's intercontinental traffic.6 Cities of the Dead gave a decidedly postcolonial spin to the stories of Atlantic entanglements after 1492, illuminating different genealogies and possibilities for what circum-Atlantic history, with its geometric forms and ever-lasting wakes,7 not only could but must look like in order to address the long-lasting verities and brutalities of the past and present global orders. Future interpretations of the everyday life and politics of such culturally-multitudinous geopolitical spaces needed to attend to the new ways of thinking and doing that performance, both theatrical and social, enacted before everyone's eyes. Performance's evanesces underlined its importance as events. Within the matrices of perpetual war and empire-building, the purposes of playing took on an almost cosmic urgency, embraced by dislocated British peoples...","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a909448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities of the Dead as Global History Kathleen Wilson (bio) Joseph Roach's famously generative study, Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance (1996), founded a new paradigm for performance, cultural, and historical studies, one that remains extravagantly transgressive of national, imperial, and hemispheric boundaries and yet astonishingly effective in materializing quotidian and unexpected demographic and cultural flows. (Calling this work "interdisciplinary" is quaint, as Eric Lott notes on the dustjacket.)1 That paradigm is circum-Atlantic performance, a tag that beckons to both its trans-hemispheric reach and mobility, triangulating between four continents (Europe, Africa, and the Americas), and to the many beings, practices, and lifeways, human and nonhuman, that constituted its hydrographical conditions of possibility. Performance in Roach's hands becomes a way of interrogating, and learning from, the messiness of cultural confrontations to see how popular and elite practices took shape in relation to each other, "repetitions with a difference" that consolidated settlements on other peoples' lands and created new kinds of societies in turn.2 From Thomas Betterton's funeral to King Zulu's Mardi Gras processions, song, speech, dance, and other bodily arts become through Roach's intercultural analysis a new kind of archive, marked by modes of kinesthetic communication and exchange whereby, to quote Victor Turner, "the ethnographies, literatures, ritual and theatrical traditions of the world" serve as the basis for "a new transcultural communicative synthesis through performance," a kind of global history of meaning-making.3 For this cultural and ethnohistorian of eighteenth-century Britain and the empire, Roach's study was quite simply the most important to appear on performance in the twentieth century, and since. Bringing together older anthropological and post-structural models with newer performance studies approaches, it helped reshape the interpretive terrain to which cultural and ethnohistorians of empire must attend. This terrain now includes the multiplicities of performances that clashed on the littorals of contested domains and that sometimes even vanquished brutality to modelnew ways of being and knowing.4 [End Page 5] The circum-Atlantic conjured by Cities of the Dead revealed an oceanic interculture marked by webs of slavery, forced labor, domination, and subordination that unfolded on four continents thanks to a single ocean and singular human trade, creating a new kind of geopolitical entity that reshaped ideas about transnational and transhemispheric history. The persistence of multiplicity in its intercultural spaces unmoored queries about origin from those merely of the nation-state and its supposedly indomitable will, and directed them instead to the stories of the struggles and triumphs of peoples who survived the murderous circuits of mercantile capitalism—and those who did not. Performance provides a unique perspective on these travails and triumphs, as memory, history, auto-ethnography, and theatrical skills were all called upon—both then and now—to make sense of this new environment where the "forgotten but not gone" continued to register their presence despite all efforts to the contrary, creating new identities and futures that hinged upon their performances of memory, loss, and replacement.5 I was broaching the intercultural complexities of the eighteenth-century British Empire when I first came upon Roach's book in 1998. Scholars had begun to confront the "white Atlantic" of Bernard Bailyn and his followers with Black, Red, and Green Atlantics more subversive of nation-state pieties, and to pitch new ways to think about cultural intermixture through the lenses of the Atlantic's intercontinental traffic.6 Cities of the Dead gave a decidedly postcolonial spin to the stories of Atlantic entanglements after 1492, illuminating different genealogies and possibilities for what circum-Atlantic history, with its geometric forms and ever-lasting wakes,7 not only could but must look like in order to address the long-lasting verities and brutalities of the past and present global orders. Future interpretations of the everyday life and politics of such culturally-multitudinous geopolitical spaces needed to attend to the new ways of thinking and doing that performance, both theatrical and social, enacted before everyone's eyes. Performance's evanesces underlined its importance as events. Within the matrices of perpetual war and empire-building, the purposes of playing took on an almost cosmic urgency, embraced by dislocated British peoples...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为全球历史的死亡之城
约瑟夫·罗奇(Joseph Roach)著名的生成研究《死亡之城:环大西洋表演》(1996)为表演、文化和历史研究建立了一个新的范式,这个范式仍然过分地超越了国家、帝国和半球的界限,但在将日常的和意想不到的人口和文化流动物化方面却惊人地有效。(正如埃里克·洛特(Eric Lott)在风衣上所指出的那样,将这一作品称为“跨学科”是古怪的。)1这种范式是绕大西洋表演,这一标签既吸引了它的跨半球范围和移动性,在四大洲(欧洲、非洲和美洲)之间进行三角测量,也吸引了许多生物、实践和生活方式,包括人类和非人类,这些构成了它的水文条件的可能性。在罗奇的手中,表演变成了一种询问和学习的方式,从文化冲突的混乱中,看到大众和精英的做法是如何相互联系形成的,“有差异的重复”巩固了在其他民族土地上的定居,并反过来创造了新的社会类型从托马斯·贝特顿(Thomas Betterton)的葬礼到祖鲁国王(King Zulu)的狂欢节游行,通过罗奇的跨文化分析,歌曲、演讲、舞蹈和其他身体艺术成为一种新的档案,以动感交流和交流模式为标志,引用维克多·特纳(Victor Turner)的话,“世界的民族志、文学、仪式和戏剧传统”作为“通过表演进行的新的跨文化交流综合”的基础,一种意义创造的全球历史对于这位研究18世纪英国和大英帝国的文化和民族历史学家来说,罗奇的研究是20世纪及以后最重要的表演研究。它将较旧的人类学和后结构模型与较新的表现研究方法结合在一起,帮助重塑了帝国文化和民族历史学家必须参与的解释领域。这个领域现在包括了在有争议的领域的沿海地区发生冲突的表演的多样性,有时甚至战胜了残暴,以塑造新的存在和认识方式。《亡灵之城》所描绘的环大西洋揭示了一种海洋间文化,这种文化以奴役、强迫劳动、统治和从属的网络为标志,由于单一的海洋和单一的人类贸易,这种文化在四大洲展开,创造了一种新的地缘政治实体,重塑了关于跨国和跨半球历史的观念。在其跨文化空间中,多样性的持续存在使人们不再仅仅对民族国家及其所谓不屈不挠的意志的起源提出疑问,而是将这些疑问引向那些在商业资本主义的凶残循环中幸存下来的民族的斗争和胜利的故事——以及那些没有幸存下来的民族。表演为这些痛苦和胜利提供了一个独特的视角,因为记忆、历史、汽车人种学和戏剧技巧都被要求——无论是当时还是现在——来理解这个新环境,在这个新环境中,“被遗忘但未消失”的人继续记录他们的存在,尽管一切努力都相反,创造新的身份和未来,这些身份和未来取决于他们对记忆、失去和替代的表演1998年,当我第一次看到罗奇的书时,我正在研究18世纪大英帝国的跨文化复杂性。学者们已经开始将伯纳德·拜林及其追随者的“白色大西洋”与更颠覆民族国家虔诚的“黑、红、绿大西洋”对立起来,并提出了通过大西洋洲际交通的视角来思考文化混合的新方法《亡灵之城》无疑给1492年后大西洋纠葛的故事带来了后殖民色彩,阐明了不同的谱系和跨大西洋历史的可能性,以其几何形状和永恒的尾迹,7不仅可以而且必须是这样的,以便解决过去和现在全球秩序中持久的真相和残酷。未来对这种文化众多的地缘政治空间的日常生活和政治的解释需要关注新的思维方式和表演方式,无论是戏剧还是社会,在每个人眼前上演。表演的消失凸显了它作为事件的重要性。在无休止的战争和帝国建设的矩阵中,玩耍的目的呈现出一种近乎宇宙的紧迫性,被流离失所的英国人所接受……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.
期刊最新文献
Polemics, Literature, and Knowledge in Eighteenth-Century Mexico: A New World for the Republic of Letters by José Francisco Robles (review) The New Cambridge Companion to Samuel Johnson ed. by Greg Clingham (review) Prince Eugene of Savoy: A Genius for War Against Louis XIV and the Ottoman Empire by James Falkner, and: Charles XII's Karoliners, Vol.1: Swedish Infantry and Artillery of the Great Northern War 1700–1721 by Sergey Shamenkov (review) The Temple of Fame and Friendship: Portraits, Music, and History in the C. P. E. Bach Circle by Annette Richards (review) Pathologies of Motion: Historical Thinking in Medicine, Aesthetics, and Poetics by Kevis Goodman (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1