Getting good at bad emotion: teachers resist and reproduce hegemonic positivity in a discourse community

IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Studies in Education Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1080/17508487.2023.2217867
Emma McMain
{"title":"Getting good at bad emotion: teachers resist and reproduce hegemonic positivity in a discourse community","authors":"Emma McMain","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2023.2217867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social and emotional learning (SEL) is a growing phenomenon in countries around the globe. With this increase in formalized ways to recognize, define, and nurture social and emotional personhood comes a need for more critical attention toward the affective-discursive practices (i.e. culturally- and materially-habituated patterns of feeling, thinking, and relating) that shape and constrain what social and emotional personhood is and what it could be. This article analyzes a discourse community in which six elementary-school teachers and I, a teacher educator, conversed about the cultural and political underpinnings of SEL and other educational practices. This included discussion about ‘hegemonic positivity’, or the tendency to seek and value positive feelings and emotional regulation above other ways of experiencing relationships and emotion. My analysis focuses on how hegemonic positivity was resisted and reproduced in our shared discussions. I illuminate the stickiness of hegemonic positivity as an affective-discursive practice, offering ideas for how it may become a topic of critical, humble, and social justice-oriented awareness for educators to collaboratively explore.","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":"365 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2023.2217867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is a growing phenomenon in countries around the globe. With this increase in formalized ways to recognize, define, and nurture social and emotional personhood comes a need for more critical attention toward the affective-discursive practices (i.e. culturally- and materially-habituated patterns of feeling, thinking, and relating) that shape and constrain what social and emotional personhood is and what it could be. This article analyzes a discourse community in which six elementary-school teachers and I, a teacher educator, conversed about the cultural and political underpinnings of SEL and other educational practices. This included discussion about ‘hegemonic positivity’, or the tendency to seek and value positive feelings and emotional regulation above other ways of experiencing relationships and emotion. My analysis focuses on how hegemonic positivity was resisted and reproduced in our shared discussions. I illuminate the stickiness of hegemonic positivity as an affective-discursive practice, offering ideas for how it may become a topic of critical, humble, and social justice-oriented awareness for educators to collaboratively explore.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
擅长不良情绪:教师在话语共同体中抵抗和再现霸权积极
社会和情感学习(SEL)在全球各国都是一个日益增长的现象。随着认识、定义和培养社会和情感人格的形式化方式的增加,需要对情感话语实践(即文化和物质习惯的感觉、思维和联系模式)进行更多的批判性关注,这些实践塑造和限制了社会和情感人格的现状和可能。本文分析了一个话语社区,在这个社区中,六名小学教师和我,一名教师教育家,就SEL和其他教育实践的文化和政治基础进行了对话。这包括关于“霸权性积极性”的讨论,或者倾向于寻求和重视积极的感受和情绪调节,而不是其他体验关系和情感的方式。我的分析集中在霸权的积极性是如何在我们共同的讨论中被抵制和再现的。我阐明了作为一种情感话语实践的霸权积极性的粘性,为它如何成为教育工作者合作探索的批判性,谦逊和社会正义导向意识的主题提供了一些想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Education
Critical Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.
期刊最新文献
Public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability Queer youth and critical sexuality education pedagogies within networked publics: implications for school-based practice Grappling with wicked problems: teacher professionalism and pedagogical mappings for reparative futures The role of online crisis actors in teachers’ work and lives Beyond conventional critique in education: embracing the affirmative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1