Casteist demons and working-class prophets: subaltern Islam in Bengal, circa 1872–1928

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1017/s1356186323000366
Layli Uddin
{"title":"Casteist demons and working-class prophets: subaltern Islam in Bengal, <i>circa</i> 1872–1928","authors":"Layli Uddin","doi":"10.1017/s1356186323000366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article investigates the relationship between caste and Islam in Bengal at a time when they acquired heightened significance as markers of identity for the colonial state and between communities. Scholarship, mainly drawing on North India, has emphasised the contrast between the existence in practice of a hierarchical system of social stratification among Muslims and the ideals and traditions of Islamic egalitarianism. This article, however, shows that caste-based struggles and tensions produced a revolutionary Islam. I suggest that the subversive potential of Islamic egalitarianism, described in early Islam by Louise Marlow, was kept alive by low-caste Bengali Muslims. The social reality of caste enabled multiple understandings of what it meant to be a Muslim, and the more radical among them were subaltern ontologies—different meanings of what it was to be a Muslim in the world. Here, I analyse writings on caste by four unreliable narrators around the turn of the twentieth century—a British colonial ethnographer, an ashrāfī Muslim anthropologist, and two Muslim reformers—to describe the politics and lifeworlds of low-caste Muslim groups in Bengal. The article argues for a more nuanced understanding of this period of Islamic reform and development, one that is conscious of the subaltern currents shaping its course. I show how a reformist politics of ‘rejection’ of elite Islam emerged as a response to the problem of caste inequality. These discourses and practices repudiating elite Muslim titles, centring histories of labour, and emphasising equality as an embodied experience reveal the revolutionary potentialities of a subaltern Islam.","PeriodicalId":17566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1356186323000366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the relationship between caste and Islam in Bengal at a time when they acquired heightened significance as markers of identity for the colonial state and between communities. Scholarship, mainly drawing on North India, has emphasised the contrast between the existence in practice of a hierarchical system of social stratification among Muslims and the ideals and traditions of Islamic egalitarianism. This article, however, shows that caste-based struggles and tensions produced a revolutionary Islam. I suggest that the subversive potential of Islamic egalitarianism, described in early Islam by Louise Marlow, was kept alive by low-caste Bengali Muslims. The social reality of caste enabled multiple understandings of what it meant to be a Muslim, and the more radical among them were subaltern ontologies—different meanings of what it was to be a Muslim in the world. Here, I analyse writings on caste by four unreliable narrators around the turn of the twentieth century—a British colonial ethnographer, an ashrāfī Muslim anthropologist, and two Muslim reformers—to describe the politics and lifeworlds of low-caste Muslim groups in Bengal. The article argues for a more nuanced understanding of this period of Islamic reform and development, one that is conscious of the subaltern currents shaping its course. I show how a reformist politics of ‘rejection’ of elite Islam emerged as a response to the problem of caste inequality. These discourses and practices repudiating elite Muslim titles, centring histories of labour, and emphasising equality as an embodied experience reveal the revolutionary potentialities of a subaltern Islam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种姓魔鬼和工人阶级先知:孟加拉次等的伊斯兰教,大约1872-1928年
本文研究了种姓和伊斯兰教在孟加拉的关系,当时种姓和伊斯兰教作为殖民地国家和社区之间的身份标志具有高度的意义。主要以北印度为研究对象的学术研究强调了穆斯林社会分层的等级制度与伊斯兰平等主义的理想和传统之间的对比。然而,这篇文章表明,基于种姓的斗争和紧张局势产生了革命性的伊斯兰教。我认为,路易斯·马洛(Louise Marlow)在早期伊斯兰教中所描述的伊斯兰平等主义的颠覆性潜力,是由低种姓的孟加拉穆斯林保持的。种姓制度的社会现实使人们对成为穆斯林意味着什么有了多种理解,其中更激进的是下层本体论——在世界上成为穆斯林的不同含义。在这里,我分析了四位不可靠的叙述者在二十世纪之交写的关于种姓的文章——一位英国殖民民族学家,一位ashrāfī穆斯林人类学家和两位穆斯林改革者——来描述孟加拉低种姓穆斯林群体的政治和生活世界。这篇文章主张对这一时期的伊斯兰改革和发展进行更细致入微的理解,意识到塑造其进程的底层潮流。我展示了一种“拒绝”伊斯兰精英的改革派政治是如何作为对种姓不平等问题的回应而出现的。这些话语和实践否定了穆斯林精英的头衔,以劳动历史为中心,强调平等是一种具体化的经历,揭示了低等伊斯兰教的革命潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
The Greatest Name of God: ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib as a cosmic image in Rajab al-Bursī's Mashāriq al-anwār Ibn Khaldūn's reception in colonial South Asia The curious case of the iniquitous in-laws: Oirat disloyalty in Mongol Iran Clay sealings from Perlis, Malaysia, and the wider world of the Bodhigarbhālaṅkāralakṣa-Dhāraṇī Mobilising human resources to build a national communications network: the case of Japan before the Pacific War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1