<i>Corrigendum to</i>: Community-driven shark monitoring for informed decision making: a case study from Fiji

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pacific Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1071/pc22009_co
C. A. Ward-Paige, H. Sykes, G. J. Osgood, J. Brunnschweiler
{"title":"&lt;i&gt;Corrigendum to&lt;/i&gt;: Community-driven shark monitoring for informed decision making: a case study from Fiji","authors":"C. A. Ward-Paige, H. Sykes, G. J. Osgood, J. Brunnschweiler","doi":"10.1071/pc22009_co","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<sec> Context Globally, more than 121 million people enjoy nature-based marine tourism, making it one of the largest marine industries. Ocean degradation threatens this industry and management has not kept pace to ensure long-term sustainability. In response, some individuals within the industry are taking it upon themselves to monitor the ocean and provide the data needed to assist management decisions. Fiji is one such place. </sec> <sec> Aims Between 2012 and 2016, 39 Fijian dive operators, in collaboration with eOceans, conducted the Great Fiji Shark Count to document sharks on their dives. </sec> <sec> Methods Using 146&amp;#x2009;304 shark observations from 30668 dives, we document spatial and temporal patterns of 11 shark species at 592 sites. </sec> <sec> Key results Sharks were observed on 13&amp;#x2009;846 dives (45% of recorded dives) at 441 (74%) sites. Generally, our results matched those from other more limited surveys, including from baited remote underwater video systems. We found high variability in shark presence, species richness, and relative abundance through space and time. One trend was surprising: the most common species, Whitetip Reef Shark, decreased over the study period at eastern sites and increased at western sites; the cause is currently unknown. </sec> <sec> Conclusions Our results can guide management and conservation needs, future scientific questions, and provide a baseline for future assessments. </sec> <sec> Implications This study demonstrates the value of longitudinal observation data that includes absences for describing marine fauna, and confirms the capacity of stakeholders to document the ocean. It also points the direction for broadscale participatory science methodologies to track the ocean. </sec>","PeriodicalId":38939,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Conservation Biology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/pc22009_co","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context Globally, more than 121 million people enjoy nature-based marine tourism, making it one of the largest marine industries. Ocean degradation threatens this industry and management has not kept pace to ensure long-term sustainability. In response, some individuals within the industry are taking it upon themselves to monitor the ocean and provide the data needed to assist management decisions. Fiji is one such place. Aims Between 2012 and 2016, 39 Fijian dive operators, in collaboration with eOceans, conducted the Great Fiji Shark Count to document sharks on their dives. Methods Using 146&#x2009;304 shark observations from 30668 dives, we document spatial and temporal patterns of 11 shark species at 592 sites. Key results Sharks were observed on 13&#x2009;846 dives (45% of recorded dives) at 441 (74%) sites. Generally, our results matched those from other more limited surveys, including from baited remote underwater video systems. We found high variability in shark presence, species richness, and relative abundance through space and time. One trend was surprising: the most common species, Whitetip Reef Shark, decreased over the study period at eastern sites and increased at western sites; the cause is currently unknown. Conclusions Our results can guide management and conservation needs, future scientific questions, and provide a baseline for future assessments. Implications This study demonstrates the value of longitudinal observation data that includes absences for describing marine fauna, and confirms the capacity of stakeholders to document the ocean. It also points the direction for broadscale participatory science methodologies to track the ocean.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
</i>社区驱动的鲨鱼监测以促进知情决策:来自斐济的案例研究
& lt; sec>全球有超过1.21亿人享受以自然为基础的海洋旅游,使其成为最大的海洋产业之一。海洋退化威胁着这一产业,而管理未能跟上确保长期可持续性的步伐。作为回应,一些业内人士承担起监测海洋的责任,并提供必要的数据,以协助管理决策。斐济就是这样一个地方。& lt; / sec>& lt; sec>2012年至2016年期间,39家斐济潜水运营商与eOceans合作,进行了“斐济鲨鱼大统计”,记录了潜水中的鲨鱼。& lt; / sec>& lt; sec>方法利用30668次潜水的146304次鲨鱼观测资料,记录了592个地点11种鲨鱼的时空格局。& lt; / sec>& lt; sec>主要结果:在441个(74%)地点的13 846次潜水(占记录潜水次数的45%)中观察到鲨鱼。总的来说,我们的结果与其他更有限的调查结果相匹配,包括来自诱饵远程水下视频系统的调查结果。我们发现鲨鱼的存在、物种丰富度和相对丰度在空间和时间上都有很大的变化。一个趋势令人惊讶:在研究期间,最常见的物种白鳍鲨在东部地点减少,在西部地点增加;目前事故原因尚不清楚。& lt; / sec>& lt; sec>结论本研究结果可以指导管理和保护需求,解决未来的科学问题,并为未来的评估提供基线。& lt; / sec>& lt; sec>本研究证明了纵向观测数据的价值,包括描述海洋动物的缺失,并证实了利益相关者记录海洋的能力。它还为大规模参与科学方法跟踪海洋指明了方向。& lt; / sec>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Conservation Biology
Pacific Conservation Biology Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Pacific Conservation Biology provides an important discussion forum for regional conservation issues, debate about management priorities, and dissemination of research results. The journal publishes original research, reviews, perspectives and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Ivor Beatty Award 2022 Special issues in Pacific Conservation Biology – an update <i>Corrigendum to</i>: The role of grass-tree <i>Xanthorrhoea semiplana</i> (Asphodelaceae) canopies in temperature regulation and waterproofing for ground-dwelling wildlife <i>Corrigendum to</i>: Community-driven shark monitoring for informed decision making: a case study from Fiji Retraction notice to ‘Key research priorities for the future of fish and fisheries in Australia’ [Pacific Conservation Biology (2022) doi:10.1071/PC21073]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1