Modelo de predicción para cuantificar la fracción de eyección recuperada del ventrículo izquierdo en taquimiocardiopatía

Q4 Medicine REC: CardioClinics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rccl.2023.10.002
Álvaro Izquierdo-Bajo , Rocío Cózar-León , Diego F. Arroyo-Moñino , Inmaculada Fernández-Valenzuela , Pablo Bastos-Amador , José Miguel Carreño-Lineros , Ernesto Díaz-Infante
{"title":"Modelo de predicción para cuantificar la fracción de eyección recuperada del ventrículo izquierdo en taquimiocardiopatía","authors":"Álvaro Izquierdo-Bajo ,&nbsp;Rocío Cózar-León ,&nbsp;Diego F. Arroyo-Moñino ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Fernández-Valenzuela ,&nbsp;Pablo Bastos-Amador ,&nbsp;José Miguel Carreño-Lineros ,&nbsp;Ernesto Díaz-Infante","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Tachycardiomyopathy is a frequent cause of reversible ventricular dysfunction, whose predictors of recovery are not properly identified. Their individual estimate would be useful to carry out the corresponding invasive procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is an observational, retrospective and unicentral study. Cases diagnosed with tachycardiomyopathy were collected between September 2015 and January 2023. The sample was split into 2 study groups: the first one was used for the construction of the linear regression model by performing a multivariate analysis based on evaluating all possible equations (sample 1, 70%); whereas the second one was intended for the validation of the model (sample 2, 30%).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 134 patients were gathered and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at recovery (the difference between final and original LVEF) was calculated in all of them. Within sample 1, setting parameters of 16,383 models were estimated. The model selected, based on Mallows’ Cp index, was the composed of the following variables: sex, arterial hypertension (HT), LVEF at diagnosis, achievement of rhythm control, and ablation. The selected model explains about half of the individual variability of the recovered LVEF (R<sup>2</sup> 0.493). Afterwards, individual LVEF at recovery predicted by the model was compared with the observed LVEF in sample 2. No overall significant differences were observed in the R<sup>2</sup> coefficient of determination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sex, arterial hypertension, LVEF at diagnosis, achievement of rhythm control, and ablation were considered as predictors of recovered LVEF in patients with tachycardiomyopathy. This has made possible a quantitative estimate when integrating them within the model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 2","pages":"Pages 95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223002996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Tachycardiomyopathy is a frequent cause of reversible ventricular dysfunction, whose predictors of recovery are not properly identified. Their individual estimate would be useful to carry out the corresponding invasive procedures.

Methods

This is an observational, retrospective and unicentral study. Cases diagnosed with tachycardiomyopathy were collected between September 2015 and January 2023. The sample was split into 2 study groups: the first one was used for the construction of the linear regression model by performing a multivariate analysis based on evaluating all possible equations (sample 1, 70%); whereas the second one was intended for the validation of the model (sample 2, 30%).

Results

A total of 134 patients were gathered and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at recovery (the difference between final and original LVEF) was calculated in all of them. Within sample 1, setting parameters of 16,383 models were estimated. The model selected, based on Mallows’ Cp index, was the composed of the following variables: sex, arterial hypertension (HT), LVEF at diagnosis, achievement of rhythm control, and ablation. The selected model explains about half of the individual variability of the recovered LVEF (R2 0.493). Afterwards, individual LVEF at recovery predicted by the model was compared with the observed LVEF in sample 2. No overall significant differences were observed in the R2 coefficient of determination.

Conclusions

Sex, arterial hypertension, LVEF at diagnosis, achievement of rhythm control, and ablation were considered as predictors of recovered LVEF in patients with tachycardiomyopathy. This has made possible a quantitative estimate when integrating them within the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心动过速心肌病左心室射血分数恢复量化预测模型
导言和目的心动过速是可逆性心室功能障碍的常见病因,其恢复的预测因素尚未得到正确识别。方法这是一项观察性、回顾性和单中心研究。收集了 2015 年 9 月至 2023 年 1 月期间确诊为心动过速的病例。样本分为两组:第一组用于构建线性回归模型,在评估所有可能方程的基础上进行多变量分析(样本 1,70%);第二组用于验证模型(样本 2,30%)。结果共收集了 134 例患者,计算了所有患者恢复时的左心室射血分数(LVEF)(最终 LVEF 与原始 LVEF 之差)。在样本 1 中,估计了 16,383 个模型的设置参数。根据 Mallows 的 Cp 指数,选定的模型由以下变量组成:性别、动脉高血压(HT)、诊断时的 LVEF、节律控制的实现以及消融。所选模型可解释恢复后 LVEF 的个体差异的一半左右(R2 0.493)。随后,将模型预测的个体恢复时 LVEF 与样本 2 中观察到的 LVEF 进行比较。结论性别、动脉高血压、诊断时的 LVEF、节律控制和消融被认为是心动过速患者 LVEF 恢复的预测因素。这使得在模型中整合这些因素时可以进行定量估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Origen anómalo de la arteria pulmonar derecha en un adulto Characterizing the “iceberg peak” in valvular heart disease: Outcomes and costs of in-hospital procedures in Spain Non-invasive multiparametric assessment of intracardiac tumor Fibroelastoma papilar aórtico e ictus: un caso ilustrativo Underuse of systemic thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism: A single center retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1