Olga Bergholz in the Literary Field: Path to the Legitimation of Status

Natalia A. Prozorova
{"title":"Olga Bergholz in the Literary Field: Path to the Legitimation of Status","authors":"Natalia A. Prozorova","doi":"10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-312-325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the position of O. F. Bergholz in the literary field of the 1930s and the struggle for legitimization of the status of the Leningrad poet in the early 1940s. The purpose of the paper is to determine the place of the poetess in the literary process of the 1930s and to identify the factors (dispositions) that contributed to her successful creative realization during wartime. In the 1930s, despite the «consecration» of M. Gorky, of Bergholz's first books, she became an object of attacks and repression: she was in a situation of alienation from the writer's environment due to the “Averbach case”, and spent six-month in prison isolation following trumped-up charges of counterrevolutionary activity. It was not that Bergholz fought for a strong position in literary field, but for the mere survival in it. After the repressions and prison, the theme of human suffering came into focus of the poetess's attention; she came to be inclined to view the blockade hardships of Leningrad residents. Bergholz's habitus, her author's strategy aimed at “helping people mentally”, correlated with the tasks of wartime. The reader's expectations for support not by the “poetry of conditional formulas”, but by a simple and “relieving” word coincided with Bergholz's aesthetics. The blockade texts moved her from the periphery of the literary field to its forefront. The poetess expressed the joint traumatic experience in a form of “letters” and “conversations” with a lively, personal intonation; let the Leningrad theme manifested in a new style (“barely poems”); opened readers` eyes on “themselves”; she conveyed the existential experience of a person on the verge of death and saw the heroism of the Leningraders as a psychological issue (how to escape “dehumanizing”). These factors allowed her to achieve the legitimate status of the besieged Leningrad`s poetess.","PeriodicalId":41255,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","volume":"538 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Slavianskikh Kultur-Bulletin of Slavic Cultures-Scientific and Informational Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2023-69-312-325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examines the position of O. F. Bergholz in the literary field of the 1930s and the struggle for legitimization of the status of the Leningrad poet in the early 1940s. The purpose of the paper is to determine the place of the poetess in the literary process of the 1930s and to identify the factors (dispositions) that contributed to her successful creative realization during wartime. In the 1930s, despite the «consecration» of M. Gorky, of Bergholz's first books, she became an object of attacks and repression: she was in a situation of alienation from the writer's environment due to the “Averbach case”, and spent six-month in prison isolation following trumped-up charges of counterrevolutionary activity. It was not that Bergholz fought for a strong position in literary field, but for the mere survival in it. After the repressions and prison, the theme of human suffering came into focus of the poetess's attention; she came to be inclined to view the blockade hardships of Leningrad residents. Bergholz's habitus, her author's strategy aimed at “helping people mentally”, correlated with the tasks of wartime. The reader's expectations for support not by the “poetry of conditional formulas”, but by a simple and “relieving” word coincided with Bergholz's aesthetics. The blockade texts moved her from the periphery of the literary field to its forefront. The poetess expressed the joint traumatic experience in a form of “letters” and “conversations” with a lively, personal intonation; let the Leningrad theme manifested in a new style (“barely poems”); opened readers` eyes on “themselves”; she conveyed the existential experience of a person on the verge of death and saw the heroism of the Leningraders as a psychological issue (how to escape “dehumanizing”). These factors allowed her to achieve the legitimate status of the besieged Leningrad`s poetess.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥尔加·伯格霍尔兹在文学领域:通往地位合法化的道路
本研究考察了o.f.伯格霍尔兹在20世纪30年代文学领域的地位,以及40年代初列宁格勒诗人地位合法化的斗争。本文的目的是确定女诗人在20世纪30年代文学进程中的地位,并找出促成她在战争期间成功实现创作的因素(性格)。在20世纪30年代,尽管伯格霍尔兹的第一部作品“神圣化”了高尔基,但她成为了攻击和镇压的对象:由于“阿弗巴赫案”,她处于与作家环境疏远的境地,并在捏造的反革命活动指控后在监狱里被隔离了六个月。伯格霍尔兹并不是为了在文坛占据强势地位而战,而是为了在文坛生存而战。在经历了压抑和牢狱之后,人类苦难的主题成为了女诗人关注的焦点;她开始倾向于关注列宁格勒居民的封锁困境。伯格霍尔兹的习惯,即她的作者旨在“在精神上帮助人们”的策略,与战时的任务有关。读者对支持的期待不是“条件公式的诗”,而是一个简单而“解脱”的词,这与伯格霍尔兹的美学不期而合。封锁文本把她从文学领域的边缘推到了前沿。女诗人以“书信”和“对话”的形式,以生动的个人语调,表达了共同的创伤经历;让列宁格勒主题以一种新的风格表现出来(“勉强是诗”);打开读者对“自己”的眼界;她传达了一个濒临死亡的人的生存体验,并将列宁格勒人的英雄主义视为一个心理问题(如何逃脱“非人化”)。这些因素使她获得了被围困的列宁格勒女诗人的合法地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Society and Genius in K. E. Tsiolkovsky`s Approach: Cultural and Philosophical Aspect Folk Adaptation of the Sentimental Romance by M. V. Zubova “I`m Going to the Desert The Role of Internet Communication in Consolidation of the Russian-Speaking Community in Brazil Semantic Constants in Preludes Op. 32 by Sergei Rachmaninoff Theonyms as Representatives of the Geocultural Image of Ancient Egypt in I.A. Bunin’s Poems of 1903–1907
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1