The Other Side of the Coin: An Analysis by Turkish Public Relations Professionals on the Qualifications of Public Relations Academics and Curricula

Burcu Oksuz, Tevhide Serra Gorpe
{"title":"The Other Side of the Coin: An Analysis by Turkish Public Relations Professionals on the Qualifications of Public Relations Academics and Curricula","authors":"Burcu Oksuz, Tevhide Serra Gorpe","doi":"10.21018/rjcpr.2023.1.352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the opinions and perceptions of senior Turkish public relations practitioners on the knowledge, skills, competencies, and personal attributes of public relations academics and public relations curriculums. A total of 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with public relations practitioners working in corporations or consultancies. Results show that the top knowledge areas for public relations practitioners include sociology, psychology, and communication, the most prominent skills include communication skills, IT skills, and visioning, the most important personal attributes include good image, sensitivity/humanity, and life-long learner, and the top competencies are performing and creating. Practical knowledge is as important as theoretical knowledge. Public relations professionals have respect for public relations academics, appreciate their input, but they suggest that the public relations curriculum should be improved and that the graduates should be better informed. This paper also reveals how a dialogue can be established between Turkish public relations academics and professionals. The collected data were analyzed under the guidance of Wengers’ communities of practice framework, and suggestions for forming communities of practice were proposed by taking the dimensions of events, leadership, connectivity, membership, learning projects, and artifacts into account. By providing data from Turkey, the findings of this work can help us improve industry–academia ties and subsequently contribute to the professionalization of public relations.","PeriodicalId":40874,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2023.1.352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the opinions and perceptions of senior Turkish public relations practitioners on the knowledge, skills, competencies, and personal attributes of public relations academics and public relations curriculums. A total of 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with public relations practitioners working in corporations or consultancies. Results show that the top knowledge areas for public relations practitioners include sociology, psychology, and communication, the most prominent skills include communication skills, IT skills, and visioning, the most important personal attributes include good image, sensitivity/humanity, and life-long learner, and the top competencies are performing and creating. Practical knowledge is as important as theoretical knowledge. Public relations professionals have respect for public relations academics, appreciate their input, but they suggest that the public relations curriculum should be improved and that the graduates should be better informed. This paper also reveals how a dialogue can be established between Turkish public relations academics and professionals. The collected data were analyzed under the guidance of Wengers’ communities of practice framework, and suggestions for forming communities of practice were proposed by taking the dimensions of events, leadership, connectivity, membership, learning projects, and artifacts into account. By providing data from Turkey, the findings of this work can help us improve industry–academia ties and subsequently contribute to the professionalization of public relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬币的另一面:土耳其公共关系专业人士对公共关系学者资格和课程的分析
本研究旨在调查土耳其高级公共关系从业人员对公共关系学者和公共关系课程的知识、技能、能力和个人属性的看法和看法。我们对在公司或顾问公司工作的公关从业员进行了20次半结构化访谈。结果显示,公共关系从业人员最重要的知识领域包括社会学、心理学和传播学,最重要的技能包括沟通技巧、IT技能和愿景,最重要的个人属性包括良好的形象、敏感/人性和终身学习者,最重要的能力是表演和创造。实践知识和理论知识一样重要。公共关系专业人士尊重公共关系学者,感谢他们的投入,但他们建议公共关系课程应该改进,毕业生应该更好地了解情况。本文还揭示了如何在土耳其公共关系学者和专业人士之间建立对话。在wenger的实践社区框架的指导下,对收集到的数据进行分析,并从事件、领导力、连通性、成员、学习项目和工件等维度提出构建实践社区的建议。通过提供来自土耳其的数据,这项工作的发现可以帮助我们改善产学研关系,从而为公共关系的专业化做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations welcomes high quality contributions investigating topics in the fields of mass media, communication and public relations, from theoretical, empirical and critical perspectives. The RJCPR mainly favors original and articulate research papers, but theory-focused articles, book reviews and other scientific contributions are also welcome
期刊最新文献
Use of Facebook Accounts with Inauthentic Behavior in Elections: The Romanian Presidential Election Case Stress Factors and Ways of Coping for Public Relations Professionals in Romania Book review of 'Advertising and Consumer Society: A Critical Introduction' (Second Edition), by Nicholas Holm, Routledge, 2023, 224 pages Barriers of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): Narratives of Older Users and Their Facilitators Consumers’ Gendered Responses to Influencer Marketing: A Research Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1