Does repeated pre-task planning have an impact on form-focused LREs?

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Teaching for Young Learners Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1075/ltyl.00038.may
María del Pilar García Mayo, María Luquin
{"title":"Does repeated pre-task planning have an impact on form-focused LREs?","authors":"María del Pilar García Mayo, María Luquin","doi":"10.1075/ltyl.00038.may","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pre-task planning has been shown to improve fluency and complexity in adult learners’ speech in monologic tasks. Previous work considered pre-task planning in interactive tasks with young children in an ESL setting and reported that, in general, it had an impact on the amount of talk. However, no study so far has considered the impact of planning on the production of language-related episodes (LREs) by young children. This study examined the relationship between planning time and the accurate production of three target form-focused LREs (FFLREs) by thirty-three dyads of 11–12-year-old EFL learners who took part in a longitudinal experiment in which they narrated picture-prompted stories four times under one of three conditions: unguided planning (12 dyads), guided planning (12 dyads), or no-planning (9 dyads). Results showed that no significant improvement in target feature production was observed across weeks or conditions. Regarding accuracy, a notable difference emerged between the pre-test and delayed post-test in the unguided planning condition. Regarding between-group comparisons, although the guided planning group initially demonstrated higher accuracy than their counterparts, this distinction was not maintained. Thus, planning had limited benefits when considering FFLREs. Methodological and pedagogical implications will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":29728,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching for Young Learners","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching for Young Learners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00038.may","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Pre-task planning has been shown to improve fluency and complexity in adult learners’ speech in monologic tasks. Previous work considered pre-task planning in interactive tasks with young children in an ESL setting and reported that, in general, it had an impact on the amount of talk. However, no study so far has considered the impact of planning on the production of language-related episodes (LREs) by young children. This study examined the relationship between planning time and the accurate production of three target form-focused LREs (FFLREs) by thirty-three dyads of 11–12-year-old EFL learners who took part in a longitudinal experiment in which they narrated picture-prompted stories four times under one of three conditions: unguided planning (12 dyads), guided planning (12 dyads), or no-planning (9 dyads). Results showed that no significant improvement in target feature production was observed across weeks or conditions. Regarding accuracy, a notable difference emerged between the pre-test and delayed post-test in the unguided planning condition. Regarding between-group comparisons, although the guided planning group initially demonstrated higher accuracy than their counterparts, this distinction was not maintained. Thus, planning had limited benefits when considering FFLREs. Methodological and pedagogical implications will be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复的任务前计划对以表单为中心的LREs有影响吗?
任务前计划已被证明可以提高成人学习者在单一任务中的语言流畅性和复杂性。先前的工作考虑了在ESL环境下与幼儿互动任务中的任务前规划,并报告说,总的来说,它对谈话量有影响。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究考虑到计划对幼儿语言相关剧集(LREs)产生的影响。本研究考察了33对11 - 12岁的英语学习者在无指导计划(12对)、有指导计划(12对)或无计划(9对)三种情况下四次叙述图片提示故事的计划时间与准确产生三个目标形式为中心的LREs (FFLREs)之间的关系。结果表明,在数周或条件下,没有观察到目标特征生产的显著改善。在非引导计划条件下,前测与延迟后测在准确性上存在显著差异。关于组间比较,虽然指导性计划组最初表现出比其对应组更高的准确性,但这种区别并没有保持下去。因此,在考虑FFLREs时,规划的好处有限。将讨论方法和教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engagement in oral production Setting research priorities for English as an Additional Language A teacher-researcher snapshot of task-based peer interactions in EFL secondary school classrooms in Germany Introducing plurilingualism in the English as an Additional Language classroom through plurilingual approaches Effects of an early start in learning English as a foreign language on reading and listening comprehension in Year 9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1