The real preschoolers of Orange County: Early number learning in a diverse group of children

Q2 Mathematics Journal of Numerical Cognition Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.5964/jnc.6577
Barbara W. Sarnecka, James Negen, Nicole R. Scalise, Meghan C. Goldman, Jeffrey N. Rouder
{"title":"The real preschoolers of Orange County: Early number learning in a diverse group of children","authors":"Barbara W. Sarnecka, James Negen, Nicole R. Scalise, Meghan C. Goldman, Jeffrey N. Rouder","doi":"10.5964/jnc.6577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p xmlns=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1\">The authors assessed a battery of number skills in a sample of over 500 preschoolers, including both monolingual and bilingual/multilingual learners from households at a range of socio-economic levels. Receptive vocabulary was measured in English for all children, and also in Spanish for those who spoke it. The first goal of the study was to describe entailment relations among numeracy skills by analyzing patterns of co-occurrence. Findings indicated that transitive and intransitive counting skills are jointly present when children show understanding of cardinality and that cardinality and knowledge of written number symbols are jointly present when children successfully use number lines. The study’s second goal was to describe relations between symbolic numeracy and language context (i.e., monolingual vs. bilingual contexts), separating these from well-documented socio-economic influences such as household income and parental education: Language context had only a modest effect on numeracy, with no differences detectable on most tasks. However, a difference did appear on the scaffolded number-line task, where bilingual learners performed slightly better than monolinguals. The third goal of the study was to find out whether symbolic number knowledge for one subset of children (Spanish/English bilingual learners from low-income households) differed when tested in their home language (Spanish) vs. their language of preschool instruction (English): Findings indicated that children performed as well or better in English than in Spanish for all measures, even when their receptive vocabulary scores in Spanish were higher than in English.","PeriodicalId":36632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Numerical Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Numerical Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors assessed a battery of number skills in a sample of over 500 preschoolers, including both monolingual and bilingual/multilingual learners from households at a range of socio-economic levels. Receptive vocabulary was measured in English for all children, and also in Spanish for those who spoke it. The first goal of the study was to describe entailment relations among numeracy skills by analyzing patterns of co-occurrence. Findings indicated that transitive and intransitive counting skills are jointly present when children show understanding of cardinality and that cardinality and knowledge of written number symbols are jointly present when children successfully use number lines. The study’s second goal was to describe relations between symbolic numeracy and language context (i.e., monolingual vs. bilingual contexts), separating these from well-documented socio-economic influences such as household income and parental education: Language context had only a modest effect on numeracy, with no differences detectable on most tasks. However, a difference did appear on the scaffolded number-line task, where bilingual learners performed slightly better than monolinguals. The third goal of the study was to find out whether symbolic number knowledge for one subset of children (Spanish/English bilingual learners from low-income households) differed when tested in their home language (Spanish) vs. their language of preschool instruction (English): Findings indicated that children performed as well or better in English than in Spanish for all measures, even when their receptive vocabulary scores in Spanish were higher than in English.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真正的橙县学龄前儿童:在不同的儿童群体中进行早期数字学习
作者对500多名学龄前儿童的一系列数字技能进行了评估,其中包括来自不同社会经济水平家庭的单语和双语/多语学习者。接受性词汇量用英语对所有孩子进行了测量,也用西班牙语对那些说西班牙语的孩子进行了测量。本研究的第一个目的是通过分析共现模式来描述计算技能之间的蕴涵关系。研究结果表明,当儿童表现出对基数的理解时,传递性和非传递性计数技能共同呈现;当儿童成功使用数轴时,基数和书面数字符号知识共同呈现。该研究的第二个目标是描述符号计算能力与语言环境(即单语与双语环境)之间的关系,将其与有充分记录的社会经济影响(如家庭收入和父母教育)分开:语言环境对计算能力只有适度的影响,在大多数任务中没有可检测到的差异。然而,在架空数轴任务中确实出现了差异,双语学习者的表现略好于单语学习者。本研究的第三个目标是找出一组儿童(来自低收入家庭的西班牙语/英语双语学习者)在用母语(西班牙语)和学龄前教育语言(英语)进行测试时,他们的符号数字知识是否有所不同:研究结果表明,儿童在英语方面的表现与西班牙语一样好,甚至更好,即使他们在西班牙语中的接受性词汇得分高于英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Numerical Cognition
Journal of Numerical Cognition Mathematics-Numerical Analysis
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
A capturing math language use during block play: Creation of the spatial and quantitative mathematical language coding system Ninth-grade students’ conceptual understanding of the number line Assessment of computation competence and non-count strategy use in addition and subtraction in Grade 1 Understanding the role of working memory and phonological memory in mathematics and response to intervention for emergent bilingual kindergartners Embodied magnitude processing: On the relation between the SNARC effect and perceived reachability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1