The Limits of Imagination in Husserl

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Studia Phaenomenologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/studphaen2023232
Seyran Sam
{"title":"The Limits of Imagination in Husserl","authors":"Seyran Sam","doi":"10.5840/studphaen2023232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to examine imagination with respect to its two poles and argues that in the phenomenological framework the locus of imagination is one between perception and ideation. Where imagination approaches perception we encounter the terminus a quo of imagination and therefore its lower limit and where it approximates ideation, we encounter its terminus ad quem and therefore its upper limit. In the former case we find the first form of imagination, which is the least articulated sense of imagination: image-consciousness. In the latter case we find the last form of imagination, which is the most articulated sense of imagination: free phantasy. On the one hand, then, image-consciousness is delineated from perception, and accordingly it is delineated from something that is determined. On the other hand, free phantasy is delineated from ideation, and as such it is delineated from something that is determining it. Situated between something that is determined and something that is determining it, the different forms of imagination can be said to have acquired different levels of freedom; imagination becomes freer the more it departs from perception and the more it approximates ideation.","PeriodicalId":42801,"journal":{"name":"Studia Phaenomenologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Phaenomenologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen2023232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper attempts to examine imagination with respect to its two poles and argues that in the phenomenological framework the locus of imagination is one between perception and ideation. Where imagination approaches perception we encounter the terminus a quo of imagination and therefore its lower limit and where it approximates ideation, we encounter its terminus ad quem and therefore its upper limit. In the former case we find the first form of imagination, which is the least articulated sense of imagination: image-consciousness. In the latter case we find the last form of imagination, which is the most articulated sense of imagination: free phantasy. On the one hand, then, image-consciousness is delineated from perception, and accordingly it is delineated from something that is determined. On the other hand, free phantasy is delineated from ideation, and as such it is delineated from something that is determining it. Situated between something that is determined and something that is determining it, the different forms of imagination can be said to have acquired different levels of freedom; imagination becomes freer the more it departs from perception and the more it approximates ideation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡塞尔的想象极限
本文试图从想象的两极来考察想象,并认为在现象学的框架中,想象的轨迹介于知觉和表象之间。在想象接近感知的地方,我们遇到了想象的终点,因此它的下限,在它接近概念的地方,我们遇到了它的终点,因此它的上限。在前一种情况下,我们发现了想象力的第一种形式,这是想象力的最不明确的意义:形象意识。在后一种情况下,我们发现了想象力的最后一种形式,这是最清晰的想象力:自由的幻想。因此,一方面,形象意识是从知觉中勾画出来的,相应地,形象意识也是从某种确定的东西中勾画出来的。另一方面,自由的幻想是从观念中被描绘出来的,因此它是从决定它的东西中被描绘出来的。处于被决定的事物和决定它的事物之间,不同形式的想象可以说获得了不同程度的自由;想象力越脱离知觉,越接近意念,就越自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Husserl’s Phenomenology Transcendental Phenomenology as Human Possibility The Icon as Revelation Cassirer und Husserl The Image of Impossibility Binding Literature and Phenomenology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1