"Hearts, Hands and Heads": Exploring the Relationship Between Disengagement and Deradicalization Through Counter Violent Extremism Project Implementation in Indonesia

Malcolm Brailey, Noor Huda Ismail, Iwan Amir
{"title":"\"Hearts, Hands and Heads\": Exploring the Relationship Between Disengagement and Deradicalization Through Counter Violent Extremism Project Implementation in Indonesia","authors":"Malcolm Brailey, Noor Huda Ismail, Iwan Amir","doi":"10.56529/mpr.v2i1.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Terrorism experts continue to debate how and why people become radicalised and commit violence. Significantly less emphasis and coherence of thought has been deployed to understand those processes in reverse. From the perspective of counterterrorism practitioners within both government and civil society, the question has tended to bifurcate around two contrasting conceptual approaches: should the focus be on ‘deradicalization’ (an internal or philosophical outcome seeking change in beliefs, values and attitudes) or ‘disengagement’ (a social or temporal outcome seeking change in behaviours away from violence)? This article seeks to contribute to the debate about how disengagement functions and stands as a practical and effective counterterrorism methodology, and is based on detailed analysis of field work and project implementation in Indonesia. This article and the methodologies implemented and tested are grounded in previous research on disengagement of Indonesian jihadists and countering violent extremism (CVE) projects conducted by several of the authors over many years, and extends and codifies the findings of a valuable body of earlier academic literature. The authors argue that a disengagement process grounded in the social methodology of personal mentoring (defined infra this paper by a process we have called ‘Hearts, Hands and Heads’) can achieve a measurable and meaningful change in how individuals withdraw from violent extremist networks. This article will further show why disengagement programs in Indonesia should prioritise targeting specific at-risk groups, including returned foreign fighters, who have been known to conduct terrorist activities in Indonesia as well as advocate for their cause and recruit more effectively than those that have never been to Syria or other conflict zones. With the proper implementation, disengagement can be an effective preventive tool in Indonesia in addition to preparing the groundwork for later, more formal deradicalization processes and programs.","PeriodicalId":165513,"journal":{"name":"Muslim Politics Review","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muslim Politics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v2i1.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terrorism experts continue to debate how and why people become radicalised and commit violence. Significantly less emphasis and coherence of thought has been deployed to understand those processes in reverse. From the perspective of counterterrorism practitioners within both government and civil society, the question has tended to bifurcate around two contrasting conceptual approaches: should the focus be on ‘deradicalization’ (an internal or philosophical outcome seeking change in beliefs, values and attitudes) or ‘disengagement’ (a social or temporal outcome seeking change in behaviours away from violence)? This article seeks to contribute to the debate about how disengagement functions and stands as a practical and effective counterterrorism methodology, and is based on detailed analysis of field work and project implementation in Indonesia. This article and the methodologies implemented and tested are grounded in previous research on disengagement of Indonesian jihadists and countering violent extremism (CVE) projects conducted by several of the authors over many years, and extends and codifies the findings of a valuable body of earlier academic literature. The authors argue that a disengagement process grounded in the social methodology of personal mentoring (defined infra this paper by a process we have called ‘Hearts, Hands and Heads’) can achieve a measurable and meaningful change in how individuals withdraw from violent extremist networks. This article will further show why disengagement programs in Indonesia should prioritise targeting specific at-risk groups, including returned foreign fighters, who have been known to conduct terrorist activities in Indonesia as well as advocate for their cause and recruit more effectively than those that have never been to Syria or other conflict zones. With the proper implementation, disengagement can be an effective preventive tool in Indonesia in addition to preparing the groundwork for later, more formal deradicalization processes and programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“心,手和头”:通过印度尼西亚反暴力极端主义项目的实施探索脱离接触与去极端化之间的关系
恐怖主义专家继续就人们如何以及为何变得激进并实施暴力展开辩论。相反地,对理解这些过程的重视程度和连贯性明显减少。从政府和民间社会反恐从业者的角度来看,这个问题往往围绕两种截然不同的概念方法而分化:重点是“去极端化”(寻求改变信仰、价值观和态度的内部或哲学结果)还是“脱离接触”(寻求改变远离暴力的行为的社会或时间结果)?本文以对印度尼西亚实地工作和项目实施的详细分析为基础,旨在促进关于脱离接触如何发挥作用以及作为一种实用有效的反恐方法的辩论。本文以及实施和测试的方法都是基于几位作者多年来对印度尼西亚圣战分子脱离接触和打击暴力极端主义(CVE)项目的研究,并扩展和整理了早期有价值的学术文献的发现。作者认为,以个人指导的社会方法论为基础的脱离过程(在本文中由我们称之为“心,手和头”的过程定义)可以在个人如何退出暴力极端主义网络方面实现可衡量和有意义的变化。本文将进一步说明为什么印度尼西亚的脱离接触计划应该优先针对特定的风险群体,包括返回的外国战斗人员,他们已经知道在印度尼西亚进行恐怖主义活动,并倡导他们的事业,比那些从未去过叙利亚或其他冲突地区的人更有效地招募。如果实施得当,脱离接触除了为以后更正式的去极端化进程和计划奠定基础之外,还可以成为印度尼西亚的一种有效的预防工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Hearts, Hands and Heads": Exploring the Relationship Between Disengagement and Deradicalization Through Counter Violent Extremism Project Implementation in Indonesia On Understanding Islam The Governance of Religious Diversity Precarious Coexistence in Maluku: Fear and Trauma in Post-Conflict Christian-Muslim Relations Social Media as a Space for Islamophobia: COVID and Social-Environment Crisis Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1