Response of Some Sugar Beet Varieties to Nitrogen and Zinc Application in Sandy Soil

Hitham Nemeat Alla, Samar Helmy, Noran Bassiony
{"title":"Response of Some Sugar Beet Varieties to Nitrogen and Zinc Application in Sandy Soil","authors":"Hitham Nemeat Alla, Samar Helmy, Noran Bassiony","doi":"10.21608/jenvbs.2023.228951.1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WO field experiments were carried out in sandy soil at Wady El-Natron, Beheira Governorate, Egypt , at (30° 23' 09'' N: 30° 25' 31'' E. 23 m above sea level) in 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 seasons to evaluate the performance of three sugar beet varieties and their response to different levels of nitrogen and zinc fertilization, on growth, yield, and quality. The present work included twenty-seven treatments, which were the combinations of three multi-germ sugar beet varieties namely Aladdin, Lulu and Zoom; three nitrogen levels (70, 95 and 120 kg/fed) and three levels of zinc (zero, 2.25 and 4.50 g/L zinc sulphate). Randomized complete block design in a split-split plot arrangement was used. The results showed that the Zoom variety outperformed the other ones, producing the thickest and heaviest roots with the highest sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, root, top and sugar yields/fed, in both seasons. Fertilizing beets with 120 kg N/fed increased root diameter, fresh weight/plant, LAI, root, top and sugar yields/fed, in both seasons. Adding 95 kg N/fed produced the highest extracted sugar, sucrose percentages and quality index, in both seasons. Spraying beets with 4.50 g/L zinc gave the highest values of root diameter, sucrose and extracted sugar percentages, root, top, and sugar yields/fed, in both seasons. The highest values of root diameter, root and sugar yields/fed were obtained by fertilizing the Zoom variety with 120 kg N/fed and spraying 4.50 g/L zinc sulphate.","PeriodicalId":11727,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jenvbs.2023.228951.1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WO field experiments were carried out in sandy soil at Wady El-Natron, Beheira Governorate, Egypt , at (30° 23' 09'' N: 30° 25' 31'' E. 23 m above sea level) in 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 seasons to evaluate the performance of three sugar beet varieties and their response to different levels of nitrogen and zinc fertilization, on growth, yield, and quality. The present work included twenty-seven treatments, which were the combinations of three multi-germ sugar beet varieties namely Aladdin, Lulu and Zoom; three nitrogen levels (70, 95 and 120 kg/fed) and three levels of zinc (zero, 2.25 and 4.50 g/L zinc sulphate). Randomized complete block design in a split-split plot arrangement was used. The results showed that the Zoom variety outperformed the other ones, producing the thickest and heaviest roots with the highest sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, root, top and sugar yields/fed, in both seasons. Fertilizing beets with 120 kg N/fed increased root diameter, fresh weight/plant, LAI, root, top and sugar yields/fed, in both seasons. Adding 95 kg N/fed produced the highest extracted sugar, sucrose percentages and quality index, in both seasons. Spraying beets with 4.50 g/L zinc gave the highest values of root diameter, sucrose and extracted sugar percentages, root, top, and sugar yields/fed, in both seasons. The highest values of root diameter, root and sugar yields/fed were obtained by fertilizing the Zoom variety with 120 kg N/fed and spraying 4.50 g/L zinc sulphate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部分甜菜品种对沙质土壤施氮、锌的响应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community voices on climate, peace and security: A social learning approach to programming environmental peacebuilding Interventions addressing conflict in communities hosting climate-influenced migrants: Literature review Protection of the environment in relation to armed conflict—50 years of effort, and no end in sight Climate change and homeland security nexus: Proposal for a comprehensive conceptual framework Positive peace and environmental sustainability: Local evidence from Afghanistan and Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1