{"title":"Freedom time: Karl Marx and <i>unpayable debt</i>","authors":"David Austin","doi":"10.1177/09213740231206106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary critically engages Denise Ferreira da Silva’s claim that Marxism is incapable of critically engaging the racial and capital alongside one another. It argues that, while it is true that conventional Marxists have either dismissed, undertheorized, or treated enslaved and colonial labor as ancillary to capitalist development – so-called “primitive accumulation” – rendering non-Europeans, non-proletarian laborers (and especially women of African descent) as outside the universal category of the Human, this is not necessarily representative of either Marx or Marxism. Reading Unpayable Debt alongside recent work by Lisa Lowe, Beverley Mullings, Saidiya Hartman, Nick Nesbitt, and Gary Wilder, I suggest a revisit of Marx’s and Marxist’s analysis of slavery, colonialism, and capitalism is necessary – and particularly the much-neglected work of Walter Rodney – in order to probe the constitutive dynamics of race, class, and gender as a constituent part and critique of capitalism and the struggle for human freedom.","PeriodicalId":43944,"journal":{"name":"CULTURAL DYNAMICS","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CULTURAL DYNAMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740231206106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This commentary critically engages Denise Ferreira da Silva’s claim that Marxism is incapable of critically engaging the racial and capital alongside one another. It argues that, while it is true that conventional Marxists have either dismissed, undertheorized, or treated enslaved and colonial labor as ancillary to capitalist development – so-called “primitive accumulation” – rendering non-Europeans, non-proletarian laborers (and especially women of African descent) as outside the universal category of the Human, this is not necessarily representative of either Marx or Marxism. Reading Unpayable Debt alongside recent work by Lisa Lowe, Beverley Mullings, Saidiya Hartman, Nick Nesbitt, and Gary Wilder, I suggest a revisit of Marx’s and Marxist’s analysis of slavery, colonialism, and capitalism is necessary – and particularly the much-neglected work of Walter Rodney – in order to probe the constitutive dynamics of race, class, and gender as a constituent part and critique of capitalism and the struggle for human freedom.
这篇评论批判性地引用了Denise Ferreira da Silva的说法,即马克思主义无法批判性地将种族和资本放在一起。它认为,虽然传统的马克思主义者对被奴役的和殖民的劳工不以为然,理论化不足,或者将其视为资本主义发展的附属品——即所谓的“原始积累”——将非欧洲人、非无产阶级劳动者(尤其是非洲裔妇女)视为人类的普遍范畴之外,但这并不一定代表马克思或马克思主义。在阅读丽莎·洛、贝弗利·穆林斯、赛迪亚·哈特曼、尼克·内斯比特和加里·怀尔德最近的著作时,我建议有必要重新审视马克思和马克思主义者对奴隶制、殖民主义和资本主义的分析——尤其是被忽视的沃尔特·罗德尼的作品——以便探索种族、阶级和性别作为资本主义和人类自由斗争的组成部分和批评的构成动力。
期刊介绍:
Our Editorial Collective seeks to publish research - and occasionally other materials such as interviews, documents, literary creations - focused on the structured inequalities of the contemporary world, and the myriad ways people negotiate these conditions. Our approach is adamantly plural, following the basic "intersectional" insight pioneered by third world feminists, whereby multiple axes of inequalities are irreducible to one another and mutually constitutive. Our interest in how people live, work and struggle is broad and inclusive: from the individual to the collective, from the militant and overtly political, to the poetic and quixotic.