Standpoint theory and double abolition

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY CULTURAL DYNAMICS Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.1177/09213740231206103
Michael Hardt
{"title":"Standpoint theory and double abolition","authors":"Michael Hardt","doi":"10.1177/09213740231206103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I read Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Unpayable Debt as an experiment that adopts “the wounded captive body in the scene of subjugation” as an epistemological standpoint. This situates her project in line with a tradition of standpoint theories that adopt, for instance, the proletarian or the feminist standpoint in similar ways. These standpoints grant us not only a superior knowledge of the current social order, highlighting its hierarchies, but also provide a political ground for seeking to abolish the structures of domination. Ferreira da Silva’s argument diverges, however, in that her standpoint does not present a subject to be affirmed, as do the other theories, but rather one that must also be abolished. In this sense, I interpret the aim of da Silva’s book to be a double abolition.","PeriodicalId":43944,"journal":{"name":"CULTURAL DYNAMICS","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CULTURAL DYNAMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740231206103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I read Denise Ferreira da Silva’s Unpayable Debt as an experiment that adopts “the wounded captive body in the scene of subjugation” as an epistemological standpoint. This situates her project in line with a tradition of standpoint theories that adopt, for instance, the proletarian or the feminist standpoint in similar ways. These standpoints grant us not only a superior knowledge of the current social order, highlighting its hierarchies, but also provide a political ground for seeking to abolish the structures of domination. Ferreira da Silva’s argument diverges, however, in that her standpoint does not present a subject to be affirmed, as do the other theories, but rather one that must also be abolished. In this sense, I interpret the aim of da Silva’s book to be a double abolition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立场理论与双重废除
我把丹尼斯·费雷拉·达·席尔瓦的《无法偿还的债务》当作一个实验,它采用了“被征服场景中受伤的俘虏身体”作为认识论的立场。这使她的项目与立场理论的传统保持一致,例如,以类似的方式采用无产阶级或女权主义的立场。这些观点不仅使我们对当前的社会秩序有了更好的认识,突出了其等级制度,而且为寻求废除统治结构提供了政治基础。然而,费雷拉·达·席尔瓦的观点有所不同,她的观点并没有像其他理论那样提出一个需要肯定的主题,而是一个必须被废除的主题。从这个意义上说,我认为da Silva这本书的目的是双重废除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CULTURAL DYNAMICS
CULTURAL DYNAMICS SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Our Editorial Collective seeks to publish research - and occasionally other materials such as interviews, documents, literary creations - focused on the structured inequalities of the contemporary world, and the myriad ways people negotiate these conditions. Our approach is adamantly plural, following the basic "intersectional" insight pioneered by third world feminists, whereby multiple axes of inequalities are irreducible to one another and mutually constitutive. Our interest in how people live, work and struggle is broad and inclusive: from the individual to the collective, from the militant and overtly political, to the poetic and quixotic.
期刊最新文献
The necessary scholarship of Dale W. Tomich Second slavery, capital and other slaveries Transatlantic LatinX studies, Iberian studies, and the Global South Contributors Biographical-poetic journeys: A conversation with Yeison F. García López
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1