Land Expropriation in Ancient Rome and Contemporary Zimbabwe: Veterans, Masculinity and War by Obert Bernard Mlambo (review)

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS CLASSICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1353/tcj.2023.a909269
Jo-Marie Claassen
{"title":"Land Expropriation in Ancient Rome and Contemporary Zimbabwe: Veterans, Masculinity and War by Obert Bernard Mlambo (review)","authors":"Jo-Marie Claassen","doi":"10.1353/tcj.2023.a909269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Land Expropriation in Ancient Rome and Contemporary Zimbabwe: Veterans, Masculinity and War by Obert Bernard Mlambo Jo-Marie Claassen Land Expropriation in Ancient Rome and Contemporary Zimbabwe: Veterans, Masculinity and War. By Obert Bernard Mlambo. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. Pp. xxvi + 246. Hardcover, $103.50. ISBN: 978–1-3502–9185–0. Should military veterans be rewarded with land, and, if so, where? These questions are of particular importance within an agrarian (pre-industrial) economy. The author of this book is from Zimbabwe. He here attempts a comparison between military veterans as agents of land expropriation as he experienced it at first hand in his own country and similar activities in late Republican Rome. His explicit intention is to clarify readers’ understanding of ancient forces in play under various Roman generals such as Sulla, Julius Caesar and Octavian by illuminating similarities and differences with his own lived reality, at times citing the experiences of his own sister and father during the War of Liberation in Zimbabwe and its aftermath, also quoting copiously from the writings of African contemporaries. A variety of ancient sources is consulted, including, among others, Vergil, Appius and Dio Cassius. Mlambo’s exposition is well founded on theory and extremely persuasive. He starts by arguing for the validity of such a comparative approach, quoting a variety modern approaches, even some aspects of feminist theory. Using these as points of departure, Mlambo looks at points of similarity (and some, remarkably few, differences) between the many land expropriations perpetrated by Roman generals to reward veterans’ loyalty or to ensure their continued fealty to their leaders and a similar process in his native country under Robert Mugabe. In the latter case, a sense of entitlement and bitterness against the white farmers, who from the 1890s onwards had taken their ancestors’ lands, fuelled the violent expropriation of (mostly) agricultural [End Page 120] land by Zimbabwean veterans. In many cases the latter dispossessed even fellow-Africans working on white-owned farms, causing new hardship in the country. In the first of eight chapters, Mlambo discusses the theoretical underpinnings of his approach, including thorough exploration of the concept of masculinity as a factor in veterans’ world-view, which involved both natural biology and culture. He also explains his own application of “practice theory” and his use of ancient sources. He cites Appian for a definition of war veterans as “those who fought on behalf of another” (30). Veterans were clients and instruments of the elite of both societies, who used both their clients’ bodies and their desire for land in order to achieve their own ends. Chapter 2 draws a detailed comparison between ancient Rome and modern Zimbabwe, with emphasis on both differences and similarities in the concept of “war veteran” in the two societies, the role of colonization in both (with Rome an active colonizer and Zimbabwe a passive victim of colonization), the “manipulation” of dead bodies and wounds, scars in either society and the appearance of “female masculinity” in Zimbabwean veteran context versus the relative helplessness of Roman women (with some exceptions, like Mark Antony’s wife Fulvia). Chapter 3 gets to grips with land ownership, masculinity (again) and war, citing inter alia Dio Cassius on the dispossession of citizens of cities which had opposed successful Roman generals, whereas in Zimbabwe, soldiers, and hence veterans, had seen themselves as repossessing land that had been forcibly taken over in the late 19th century during colonization by British imperialists. The concept of veterans as heroes of the struggle who had “taken back” what had been their ancestors’ land, with an emphasis on their heroic masculinity and sense of entitlement, is compared with Roman veterans’ sense of personal entitlement to land as a reward for the heroic hardship they had endured while fighting for their respective generals. The fourth chapter is devoted to what Mlambo terms “warfare madness”—a mindless rage that gives impetus to serious fighting and, often, wanton destruction, as depicted in authors such as Lucan, Dio and Appian and also displayed by Zimbabwean guerrilla-fighters. Too often, women were the victims of such assertion of fighters’ military masculinity in both societies. The topic of Chapter 5...","PeriodicalId":35668,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL JOURNAL","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tcj.2023.a909269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reviewed by: Land Expropriation in Ancient Rome and Contemporary Zimbabwe: Veterans, Masculinity and War by Obert Bernard Mlambo Jo-Marie Claassen Land Expropriation in Ancient Rome and Contemporary Zimbabwe: Veterans, Masculinity and War. By Obert Bernard Mlambo. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. Pp. xxvi + 246. Hardcover, $103.50. ISBN: 978–1-3502–9185–0. Should military veterans be rewarded with land, and, if so, where? These questions are of particular importance within an agrarian (pre-industrial) economy. The author of this book is from Zimbabwe. He here attempts a comparison between military veterans as agents of land expropriation as he experienced it at first hand in his own country and similar activities in late Republican Rome. His explicit intention is to clarify readers’ understanding of ancient forces in play under various Roman generals such as Sulla, Julius Caesar and Octavian by illuminating similarities and differences with his own lived reality, at times citing the experiences of his own sister and father during the War of Liberation in Zimbabwe and its aftermath, also quoting copiously from the writings of African contemporaries. A variety of ancient sources is consulted, including, among others, Vergil, Appius and Dio Cassius. Mlambo’s exposition is well founded on theory and extremely persuasive. He starts by arguing for the validity of such a comparative approach, quoting a variety modern approaches, even some aspects of feminist theory. Using these as points of departure, Mlambo looks at points of similarity (and some, remarkably few, differences) between the many land expropriations perpetrated by Roman generals to reward veterans’ loyalty or to ensure their continued fealty to their leaders and a similar process in his native country under Robert Mugabe. In the latter case, a sense of entitlement and bitterness against the white farmers, who from the 1890s onwards had taken their ancestors’ lands, fuelled the violent expropriation of (mostly) agricultural [End Page 120] land by Zimbabwean veterans. In many cases the latter dispossessed even fellow-Africans working on white-owned farms, causing new hardship in the country. In the first of eight chapters, Mlambo discusses the theoretical underpinnings of his approach, including thorough exploration of the concept of masculinity as a factor in veterans’ world-view, which involved both natural biology and culture. He also explains his own application of “practice theory” and his use of ancient sources. He cites Appian for a definition of war veterans as “those who fought on behalf of another” (30). Veterans were clients and instruments of the elite of both societies, who used both their clients’ bodies and their desire for land in order to achieve their own ends. Chapter 2 draws a detailed comparison between ancient Rome and modern Zimbabwe, with emphasis on both differences and similarities in the concept of “war veteran” in the two societies, the role of colonization in both (with Rome an active colonizer and Zimbabwe a passive victim of colonization), the “manipulation” of dead bodies and wounds, scars in either society and the appearance of “female masculinity” in Zimbabwean veteran context versus the relative helplessness of Roman women (with some exceptions, like Mark Antony’s wife Fulvia). Chapter 3 gets to grips with land ownership, masculinity (again) and war, citing inter alia Dio Cassius on the dispossession of citizens of cities which had opposed successful Roman generals, whereas in Zimbabwe, soldiers, and hence veterans, had seen themselves as repossessing land that had been forcibly taken over in the late 19th century during colonization by British imperialists. The concept of veterans as heroes of the struggle who had “taken back” what had been their ancestors’ land, with an emphasis on their heroic masculinity and sense of entitlement, is compared with Roman veterans’ sense of personal entitlement to land as a reward for the heroic hardship they had endured while fighting for their respective generals. The fourth chapter is devoted to what Mlambo terms “warfare madness”—a mindless rage that gives impetus to serious fighting and, often, wanton destruction, as depicted in authors such as Lucan, Dio and Appian and also displayed by Zimbabwean guerrilla-fighters. Too often, women were the victims of such assertion of fighters’ military masculinity in both societies. The topic of Chapter 5...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古罗马与当代津巴布韦的土地征用:退伍军人、男子气概与战争作者:奥伯特·伯纳德·姆兰博
《古罗马土地征用与当代津巴布韦:退伍军人、男子气概与战争》作者:Obert Bernard Mlambo Jo-Marie Claassen罗伯特·伯纳德·姆兰博著。伦敦,英国:布卢姆斯伯里学院,2022年。第二十六页+ 246页。精装书,103.50美元。ISBN: 978-1-3502-9185-0。退伍军人应该得到土地奖励吗?如果应该,在哪里?这些问题在农业(工业化前)经济中尤为重要。这本书的作者来自津巴布韦。在这里,他试图将退伍军人作为土地征用的代理人进行比较,因为他在自己的国家亲身经历了这一点,而在共和后期的罗马,他也经历了类似的活动。他的明确意图是通过阐明与他自己生活的现实的异同,阐明读者对在苏拉、朱利叶斯·凯撒和屋大维等各种罗马将军统治下的古代力量的理解,有时引用他自己的妹妹和父亲在津巴布韦解放战争及其后果中的经历,也大量引用非洲同时代人的著作。参考了各种古代资料,其中包括维吉尔、阿皮乌斯和迪奥·卡修斯。姆兰博的论述有很好的理论基础,非常有说服力。他首先论证了这种比较方法的有效性,引用了各种现代方法,甚至是女性主义理论的一些方面。以这些为出发点,姆兰博着眼于罗马将军为奖励退伍军人的忠诚或确保他们继续忠于他们的领导人而实施的许多土地征用与他的祖国罗伯特·穆加贝(Robert Mugabe)统治下的类似过程之间的相似点(以及一些明显的差异)。在后一种情况下,一种权利意识和对白人农民的怨恨,这些白人农民从19世纪90年代开始夺取了他们祖先的土地,助长了津巴布韦退伍军人对(主要是)农业土地的暴力征用。在许多情况下,后者甚至剥夺了在白人拥有的农场工作的非洲同胞,给这个国家带来了新的困难。在八章的第一章中,Mlambo讨论了他的方法的理论基础,包括深入探索作为退伍军人世界观因素的男子气概概念,这涉及自然生物学和文化。他还解释了自己对“实践论”的运用和对古代资料的使用。他引用了阿皮安对老兵的定义:“那些为他人而战的人”(30)。退伍军人是两个社会精英的客户和工具,他们利用客户的身体和对土地的渴望来达到自己的目的。第二章对古罗马和现代津巴布韦进行了详细的比较,重点是两个社会中“退伍军人”概念的异同,殖民在两者中的作用(罗马是积极的殖民者,津巴布韦是被动的殖民受害者),对尸体和伤口的“操纵”,社会上的伤疤和津巴布韦退伍军人背景下的“女性阳刚之气”与罗马女性的相对无助(有一些例外,比如马克·安东尼的妻子富尔维亚)。第三章讨论了土地所有权、男子气概(再次)和战争,特别引用了迪奥·卡修斯(Dio Cassius)对反对成功的罗马将军的城市公民的剥夺,而在津巴布韦,士兵,因此退伍军人,认为自己重新拥有了19世纪后期被英帝国主义殖民时期强行占领的土地。退伍军人是“夺回”祖先土地的斗争英雄,强调他们的英雄气概和权利意识,与罗马退伍军人的个人权利意识相比较,他们认为土地是对他们在为各自的将军战斗时所忍受的英勇苦难的奖励。第四章致力于姆兰博所称的“战争疯狂”——一种无意识的愤怒,这种愤怒会推动激烈的战斗,通常是肆意的破坏,正如卢坎、迪奥和阿皮安等作家所描述的那样,津巴布韦游击队也表现出来。在这两个社会中,女性往往是这种对战士的男子气概的断言的受害者。第五章的主题是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CLASSICAL JOURNAL
CLASSICAL JOURNAL Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Classical Journal (ISSN 0009–8353) is published by the Classical Association of the Middle West and South (CAMWS), the largest regional classics association in the United States and Canada, and is now over a century old. All members of CAMWS receive the journal as a benefit of membership; non-member and library subscriptions are also available. CJ appears four times a year (October–November, December–January, February–March, April–May); each issue consists of about 100 pages.
期刊最新文献
Unfinished Christians: Ritual Objects and Silent Subjects in Late Antiquity by Georgia Frank (review) Ovationes Anni Salvtis Mmxxiii News and the Family in Ancient Greece Simonides Lyricus: Essays on the 'Other' Classical Choral Lyric Poet ed. by Peter Agócs and Lucia Prauscello (review) Valerius Flaccus: Argonautica Book 8: Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary by Cristiano Castelletti et al. (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1