(1-3)-β-D-Glucan Antigen Detection and PCR for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Lung Infections

Wafaa Elkasaby, Fikry El-Morsy, Mohammad El badrawy, Niveen El-wakeel
{"title":"(1-3)-β-D-Glucan Antigen Detection and PCR for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Lung Infections","authors":"Wafaa Elkasaby, Fikry El-Morsy, Mohammad El badrawy, Niveen El-wakeel","doi":"10.21608/ejmm.2023.320674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Invasive fungal lung infection (IFLI) is a collective term used to describe a range of opportunistic infections, caused by one or more endemic or opportunistic fungi, the most isolated microbes in these infections are Candida species, Aspergillus species and Cryptococcus species. Clinical symptoms typically manifest as fever, cough, dyspnea, chest pain, and hemoptysis, Radiologic examination showed various presentations, few had typical features, such as denseness, cavitation, a halo sign some even showed negative results. For diagnosis; microscopy, fungal culture, galactomannan antigen, and PCR are useful tests. Other tools include imaging facilities and blood serum biomarkers. Antigen detection methods include (1-3)-β-D-Glucan lacks higher sensitivity, PCR hasn’t been standardized, in this study, we evaluated serum (1-3)-β-D- Glucan antigen in comparison with PCR for diagnosis accuracy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate serum (1-3)-β-D-Glucan antigen detection and PCR methods for diagnosis of invasive fungal lung infections . Methodology: The study conducted a cross-sectional comparative study on suspected IFLI patients and a healthy control group. Clinical and radiological criteria were used for patient selection. Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were collected for biomarker assessment. PCR and BDG antigen detection were evaluated. Results: Male patients accounted for 78.1%, with no significant gender difference. Hypertension (40%), followed by diabetes (22%), were identified as the most common risk factors. BDG antigen levels were significantly associated with fungal infections. Sensitivity was 92%, specificity 80%, with an AUC of 0.879. BDG levels correlated with treatment outcomes. Conclusion: Elevated BDG levels were associated with cancer and COPD patients. While BDG provides supportive evidence for fungal infection, a multifaceted approach is crucial. Implementing new diagnostic tools and centralizing laboratories of fungal identification in clinical setting are essential as the diagnostic landscape evolves.","PeriodicalId":22549,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2023.320674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Invasive fungal lung infection (IFLI) is a collective term used to describe a range of opportunistic infections, caused by one or more endemic or opportunistic fungi, the most isolated microbes in these infections are Candida species, Aspergillus species and Cryptococcus species. Clinical symptoms typically manifest as fever, cough, dyspnea, chest pain, and hemoptysis, Radiologic examination showed various presentations, few had typical features, such as denseness, cavitation, a halo sign some even showed negative results. For diagnosis; microscopy, fungal culture, galactomannan antigen, and PCR are useful tests. Other tools include imaging facilities and blood serum biomarkers. Antigen detection methods include (1-3)-β-D-Glucan lacks higher sensitivity, PCR hasn’t been standardized, in this study, we evaluated serum (1-3)-β-D- Glucan antigen in comparison with PCR for diagnosis accuracy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate serum (1-3)-β-D-Glucan antigen detection and PCR methods for diagnosis of invasive fungal lung infections . Methodology: The study conducted a cross-sectional comparative study on suspected IFLI patients and a healthy control group. Clinical and radiological criteria were used for patient selection. Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were collected for biomarker assessment. PCR and BDG antigen detection were evaluated. Results: Male patients accounted for 78.1%, with no significant gender difference. Hypertension (40%), followed by diabetes (22%), were identified as the most common risk factors. BDG antigen levels were significantly associated with fungal infections. Sensitivity was 92%, specificity 80%, with an AUC of 0.879. BDG levels correlated with treatment outcomes. Conclusion: Elevated BDG levels were associated with cancer and COPD patients. While BDG provides supportive evidence for fungal infection, a multifaceted approach is crucial. Implementing new diagnostic tools and centralizing laboratories of fungal identification in clinical setting are essential as the diagnostic landscape evolves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(1-3)-β- d -葡聚糖抗原检测与PCR诊断侵袭性肺部真菌感染
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights into Biofilm-based Multidrug Resistance in Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolated from Patients Hospitalized in Benha University Intensive Care Unit Association between Dysbiosis of Key Species of Nasal Microbiome and Allergic Rhinitis in Adult Patients Invasive Versus Noninvasive Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori infection Detection of Vancomycin Resistance among Hospital and Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Biofilm Formation by Acinetobacter Species Isolated from Intensive Care Units: Unveiling the Impact on Antibiotic Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1