Outcomes and Complications of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion as a Surgical Option in Elderly Patients (Over 70 Years Old) with Degenerative Spinal Disease

Yong Min Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Bu Kwang Oh, Su Hung Lee, Jun Seok Lee, Young Ha Kim, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song
{"title":"Outcomes and Complications of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion as a Surgical Option in Elderly Patients (Over 70 Years Old) with Degenerative Spinal Disease","authors":"Yong Min Lee, Dong Wuk Son, Bu Kwang Oh, Su Hung Lee, Jun Seok Lee, Young Ha Kim, Soon Ki Sung, Sang Weon Lee, Geun Sung Song","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2023.00346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: As Korea has become a super-aging society, the number of elderly patients with degenerative spinal disease has steadily increased. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) by comparing the results and complications between OLIF and open spinal fusion in elderly patients with degenerative spinal disease.Methods: Thirty-one patients underwent one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and 35 patients underwent one-level indirect decompression OLIF. The clinical outcomes of the two patient groups were analyzed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Through a comparative analysis of pre- and post-operative images, we measured changes in disc height (DH) and foraminal height (FH), and investigated the occurrence of subsidence in each patient group. The cross-sectional area was measured using magnetic resonance imaging pre- and post-operatively in OLIF.Results: The pre-operative VAS and ODI scores were similar between the two groups and tended to improve post-operatively. In the OLIF group, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower, DH and FH gains were more frequent, DH and FH maintenance was better, and cage subsidence occurred less frequently. In OLIF, psoas paresis and approach-site hematoma occurred; however, all patients with psoas paresis recovered without further treatment before discharge. In the PLIF group, dural tears occurred in four patients who recovered without revision surgery. Conclusion: OLIF enables indirect decompression, reduced EBL, shorter hospitalization, and lesser subsidence. OLIF is considered a beneficial, minimally invasive surgical method for elderly patients.","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"7 29","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2023.00346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: As Korea has become a super-aging society, the number of elderly patients with degenerative spinal disease has steadily increased. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) by comparing the results and complications between OLIF and open spinal fusion in elderly patients with degenerative spinal disease.Methods: Thirty-one patients underwent one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and 35 patients underwent one-level indirect decompression OLIF. The clinical outcomes of the two patient groups were analyzed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Through a comparative analysis of pre- and post-operative images, we measured changes in disc height (DH) and foraminal height (FH), and investigated the occurrence of subsidence in each patient group. The cross-sectional area was measured using magnetic resonance imaging pre- and post-operatively in OLIF.Results: The pre-operative VAS and ODI scores were similar between the two groups and tended to improve post-operatively. In the OLIF group, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower, DH and FH gains were more frequent, DH and FH maintenance was better, and cage subsidence occurred less frequently. In OLIF, psoas paresis and approach-site hematoma occurred; however, all patients with psoas paresis recovered without further treatment before discharge. In the PLIF group, dural tears occurred in four patients who recovered without revision surgery. Conclusion: OLIF enables indirect decompression, reduced EBL, shorter hospitalization, and lesser subsidence. OLIF is considered a beneficial, minimally invasive surgical method for elderly patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斜侧体间融合术作为退行性脊柱疾病老年患者(70岁以上)的手术选择的结果和并发症
目的:随着韩国进入超老龄化社会,老年退行性脊柱疾病患者数量稳步增加。本研究旨在通过比较腰椎斜椎体间融合术(OLIF)和开放式脊柱融合术在老年退行性脊柱疾病患者中的效果和并发症来评估OLIF的有效性。方法:31例患者行一节段后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF), 35例行一节段间接减压(OLIF)。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)对两组患者的临床结果进行分析。通过术前和术后图像的对比分析,我们测量了椎间盘高度(DH)和椎间孔高度(FH)的变化,并调查了每组患者下沉的发生情况。在OLIF术前和术后使用磁共振成像测量横截面积。结果:两组患者术前VAS、ODI评分相近,术后均有改善趋势。OLIF组的估计失血量(EBL)显著降低,DH和FH增加更频繁,DH和FH维持更好,笼子下沉发生的频率更低。OLIF患者出现腰肌轻瘫和入路部位血肿;然而,所有腰肌轻瘫患者出院前均未接受进一步治疗。在PLIF组中,有4例患者发生硬脑膜撕裂,但未进行翻修手术。结论:OLIF能够间接减压,减少EBL,缩短住院时间,减少下沉。OLIF被认为是一种对老年患者有益的微创手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and Complications of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion as a Surgical Option in Elderly Patients (Over 70 Years Old) with Degenerative Spinal Disease Catastrophic Complications Following Spinal Deformity Surgery in a Patient with Myotonic Dystrophy Non-Traumatic Cervical Disc Herniation Presented as Sudden Paralysis of the Limbs: Two Case Reports An Intravertebral Pseudoaneurysm Formed after Infective Spondylitis Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Spinal Fusion Surgery in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1