INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRY 4.0 MATURITY LEVEL

Hüseyin Selçuk Kılıç, Zeynep Tuğçe Kalender, Can Korkmaz, Betül Kaya
{"title":"INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRY 4.0 MATURITY LEVEL","authors":"Hüseyin Selçuk Kılıç, Zeynep Tuğçe Kalender, Can Korkmaz, Betül Kaya","doi":"10.13033/ijahp.v15i2.1096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to adapt to changes in information and communication technologies is essential for all organizations. Companies that fail to correctly perceive the need for these changes and delay their implementation are doomed to disappear. In this context, the term Industry 4.0 is used to refer to digital improvement studies. It aims to increase profitability by reducing production costs without increasing the focus areas of companies. Determining the level of digitalization is as important as completing the digitalization infrastructure to bring Industry 4.0 to life. In this way, companies can determine their current digitalization status and maintain their competitiveness. They can also decide the steps needed to implement Industry 4.0. Currently, there are many methods and models used to determine the level of digitalization. However, this study takes a distinctive approach by aiming to develop an integrated methodology tailored for quantifying Industry 4.0 maturity in companies. To begin, the dimensions used within the Industry 4.0 maturity assessment were extracted from the literature. Then, a focus group approach was utilized by experts to eliminate the unimportant dimensions. Next, Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy AHP (IVSF-AHP) was used to determine the importance weights of the determined dimensions. Finally, the Industry 4.0 maturity level of an aviation/defense company was calculated by applying the proposed methodology based on the data collected via the questionnaire. Therefore, this proposed methodology provides a potent instrument for accurately appraising progress in digital transformation, refining strategies, and securing success in an evolving technology-driven environment.","PeriodicalId":37297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v15i2.1096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to adapt to changes in information and communication technologies is essential for all organizations. Companies that fail to correctly perceive the need for these changes and delay their implementation are doomed to disappear. In this context, the term Industry 4.0 is used to refer to digital improvement studies. It aims to increase profitability by reducing production costs without increasing the focus areas of companies. Determining the level of digitalization is as important as completing the digitalization infrastructure to bring Industry 4.0 to life. In this way, companies can determine their current digitalization status and maintain their competitiveness. They can also decide the steps needed to implement Industry 4.0. Currently, there are many methods and models used to determine the level of digitalization. However, this study takes a distinctive approach by aiming to develop an integrated methodology tailored for quantifying Industry 4.0 maturity in companies. To begin, the dimensions used within the Industry 4.0 maturity assessment were extracted from the literature. Then, a focus group approach was utilized by experts to eliminate the unimportant dimensions. Next, Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy AHP (IVSF-AHP) was used to determine the importance weights of the determined dimensions. Finally, the Industry 4.0 maturity level of an aviation/defense company was calculated by applying the proposed methodology based on the data collected via the questionnaire. Therefore, this proposed methodology provides a potent instrument for accurately appraising progress in digital transformation, refining strategies, and securing success in an evolving technology-driven environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业4.0成熟度水平评估的综合方法
适应信息和通信技术变化的能力对所有组织都至关重要。未能正确认识到这些变化的必要性并推迟实施这些变化的公司注定会消失。在这种情况下,术语工业4.0是指数字化改进研究。它的目的是在不增加企业重点领域的情况下,通过降低生产成本来提高盈利能力。确定数字化水平与完成数字化基础设施以实现工业4.0同样重要。通过这种方式,企业可以确定自己目前的数字化状态,保持自己的竞争力。他们还可以决定实施工业4.0所需的步骤。目前,有许多方法和模型用于确定数字化水平。然而,本研究采取了一种独特的方法,旨在开发一种专门用于量化企业工业4.0成熟度的综合方法。首先,从文献中提取工业4.0成熟度评估中使用的维度。然后,专家采用焦点小组的方法剔除不重要的维度。其次,采用区间值球面模糊层次分析法(IVSF-AHP)确定所确定维度的重要性权重。最后,基于问卷调查收集的数据,应用提出的方法计算了某航空/国防公司的工业4.0成熟度水平。因此,该建议的方法为准确评估数字化转型的进展、改进战略和确保在不断发展的技术驱动环境中取得成功提供了强有力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: IJAHP is a scholarly journal that publishes papers about research and applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Analytic Network Process(ANP), theories of measurement that can handle tangibles and intangibles; these methods are often applied in multicriteria decision making, prioritization, ranking and resource allocation, especially when groups of people are involved. The journal encourages research papers in both theory and applications. Empirical investigations, comparisons and exemplary real-world applications in diverse areas are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
ADOPTION OF ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS TO STRENGTHEN HALAL INTEGRITY IN BROILER CHICKEN SUPPLY CHAIN APPLICATION OF THE AHP METHOD IN SELECTING BASEBALL PITCHERS ALGORITHM BASED ON PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR HANDLING INCOMPLETE PAIRWISE COMPARISON SITUATIONS IN AHP EVALUATING THE SUCCESS FACTORS FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR: AN AHP- DEMATEL APPROACH CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EMPLOYEES USING AHP AND MODIFIED PUGH MATRIX METHOD: CONTRASTING WITH TOPSIS, PROMETHEE AND VIKOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1