APPLICATION OF THE AHP METHOD IN SELECTING BASEBALL PITCHERS

Pedro Teppa-Garran, Carlos Fernández-Da Costa
{"title":"APPLICATION OF THE AHP METHOD IN SELECTING BASEBALL PITCHERS","authors":"Pedro Teppa-Garran, Carlos Fernández-Da Costa","doi":"10.13033/ijahp.v16i1.1094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of scientific methods to determine performance results and analyze the effectiveness of sports players constitutes a powerful tool that can help coaches and teams make better decisions and adequately use available resources. Pitcher selection is a strategic decision that significantly influences the performance of a professional baseball team. In this study, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) models were built to rank the performance of baseball pitchers in Major League Baseball (MLB) in the United States. There are three relevant aspects of this research.  First, the models allow the evaluation of the overall performance of the pitcher, considering his skills and performance as a pitcher as well as his fielding and batting contributions. To evaluate the overall performance of a pitcher, well-known standard professional baseball statistics were used. Second, to highlight the flexibility of the model, four models were created according to the type of pitcher (starter or reliever) and the league in which he plays (American or National league). Finally, a distinctive feature of the models is their general scope. The experts were only required to determine the best criteria and subcriteria and the priorities of the hierarchical structure of the models, but they were not needed to rank the pitchers (alternatives). The models were applied to different emblematic MLB awards and the results produced by the models coincide with the pitchers who actually won the awards.","PeriodicalId":37297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v16i1.1094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of scientific methods to determine performance results and analyze the effectiveness of sports players constitutes a powerful tool that can help coaches and teams make better decisions and adequately use available resources. Pitcher selection is a strategic decision that significantly influences the performance of a professional baseball team. In this study, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) models were built to rank the performance of baseball pitchers in Major League Baseball (MLB) in the United States. There are three relevant aspects of this research.  First, the models allow the evaluation of the overall performance of the pitcher, considering his skills and performance as a pitcher as well as his fielding and batting contributions. To evaluate the overall performance of a pitcher, well-known standard professional baseball statistics were used. Second, to highlight the flexibility of the model, four models were created according to the type of pitcher (starter or reliever) and the league in which he plays (American or National league). Finally, a distinctive feature of the models is their general scope. The experts were only required to determine the best criteria and subcriteria and the priorities of the hierarchical structure of the models, but they were not needed to rank the pitchers (alternatives). The models were applied to different emblematic MLB awards and the results produced by the models coincide with the pitchers who actually won the awards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在选择棒球投手时应用 AHP 方法
使用科学方法来确定体育运动员的表现结果和分析其效率,是一种强大的工具,可以帮助教练和球队做出更好的决策,并充分使用可用资源。选择投手是一项战略决策,对职业棒球队的表现有重大影响。本研究建立了层次分析法(AHP)模型,对美国职业棒球大联盟(MLB)中棒球投手的表现进行排序。这项研究有三个相关方面。 首先,这些模型可以对投手的整体表现进行评估,既考虑到他作为投手的技能和表现,也考虑到他在外野和打击方面的贡献。为了评估投手的整体表现,我们使用了众所周知的标准职业棒球统计数据。其次,为了突出模型的灵活性,根据投手的类型(先发或替补)和所在联赛(美国或全国联赛)创建了四个模型。最后,模型的一个显著特点是范围广泛。专家们只需确定最佳标准和次级标准,以及模型分层结构的优先次序,而无需对投手(备选方案)进行排序。这些模型适用于 MLB 的不同标志性奖项,模型得出的结果与实际获奖的投手不谋而合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: IJAHP is a scholarly journal that publishes papers about research and applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Analytic Network Process(ANP), theories of measurement that can handle tangibles and intangibles; these methods are often applied in multicriteria decision making, prioritization, ranking and resource allocation, especially when groups of people are involved. The journal encourages research papers in both theory and applications. Empirical investigations, comparisons and exemplary real-world applications in diverse areas are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
ADOPTION OF ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS TO STRENGTHEN HALAL INTEGRITY IN BROILER CHICKEN SUPPLY CHAIN APPLICATION OF THE AHP METHOD IN SELECTING BASEBALL PITCHERS ALGORITHM BASED ON PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR HANDLING INCOMPLETE PAIRWISE COMPARISON SITUATIONS IN AHP EVALUATING THE SUCCESS FACTORS FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR: AN AHP- DEMATEL APPROACH CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EMPLOYEES USING AHP AND MODIFIED PUGH MATRIX METHOD: CONTRASTING WITH TOPSIS, PROMETHEE AND VIKOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1