A comparison of virtual and in person delivery of a full meal replacement program for obesity

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1002/osp4.718
Matthew Skeldon, David Harris, Robert Dent, Judy Y Shiau
{"title":"A comparison of virtual and in person delivery of a full meal replacement program for obesity","authors":"Matthew Skeldon, David Harris, Robert Dent, Judy Y Shiau","doi":"10.1002/osp4.718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Full meal replacement (FMR) Intensive Lifestyle Interventions (ILI) have been used for weight management. However, predictors of efficacy with these programs are less clear. The primary objective was to assess weight loss predictors in a community‐based FMR ILI program. A secondary objective was to determine if weight loss was different between virtual and in person ILI. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study involving 234 patients who started the program between 1 January 2016 and 3 March 2021. In the 24‐week program, patients spent 12 weeks on FMR and then transitioned back to food for the remainder, with weekly follow up with a physician and group sessions with a dietitian. Visits were in person prior to March 2020 and virtual afterward. Results Patients' average age was 47.5 years (SD = 12.0) and 73.5% were female. Average weight loss was 14.3% (SD = 6.2%). There was no significant difference in weight loss between virtual and in person programs. Patients on a Glucagon‐like Peptide‐1 Receptor Agonist prior lost less weight. Other significant associations between groups were baseline Hemoglobin A 1 C, classes attended, as well as the age since peak weight. Conclusion Weight loss from virtual ILI was not significantly different from person ILI. More research is needed to determine how to best stratify care as virtual or in person using FMR programs.","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"34 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective Full meal replacement (FMR) Intensive Lifestyle Interventions (ILI) have been used for weight management. However, predictors of efficacy with these programs are less clear. The primary objective was to assess weight loss predictors in a community‐based FMR ILI program. A secondary objective was to determine if weight loss was different between virtual and in person ILI. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study involving 234 patients who started the program between 1 January 2016 and 3 March 2021. In the 24‐week program, patients spent 12 weeks on FMR and then transitioned back to food for the remainder, with weekly follow up with a physician and group sessions with a dietitian. Visits were in person prior to March 2020 and virtual afterward. Results Patients' average age was 47.5 years (SD = 12.0) and 73.5% were female. Average weight loss was 14.3% (SD = 6.2%). There was no significant difference in weight loss between virtual and in person programs. Patients on a Glucagon‐like Peptide‐1 Receptor Agonist prior lost less weight. Other significant associations between groups were baseline Hemoglobin A 1 C, classes attended, as well as the age since peak weight. Conclusion Weight loss from virtual ILI was not significantly different from person ILI. More research is needed to determine how to best stratify care as virtual or in person using FMR programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项针对肥胖的虚拟和面对面的全餐替代方案的比较
【摘要】目的采用全餐替代(FMR)强化生活方式干预(ILI)进行体重管理。然而,这些项目的疗效预测指标还不太清楚。主要目的是评估以社区为基础的FMR ILI项目中体重减轻的预测因素。第二个目的是确定虚拟ILI和真人ILI之间的体重减轻是否不同。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,涉及234名患者,他们在2016年1月1日至2021年3月3日期间开始该项目。在为期24周的项目中,患者花了12周的时间进行FMR治疗,然后在剩下的时间里恢复到食物治疗,每周有一位医生进行随访,并有一位营养师进行小组会议。2020年3月之前是亲自访问,之后是虚拟访问。结果患者平均年龄47.5岁(SD = 12.0),女性占73.5%。平均体重减轻14.3% (SD = 6.2%)。虚拟课程和真人课程在减肥方面没有显著差异。先前使用胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂的患者体重减轻较少。两组之间的其他显著关联是基线血红蛋白1c、参加的课程以及体重达到峰值后的年龄。结论虚拟ILI患者体重减轻与真人ILI患者无显著差异。需要更多的研究来确定如何最好地分层护理是虚拟还是亲自使用FMR程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Behavioral weight loss interventions in college health centers: A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to implementation. A Novel and Comprehensive Wellness Assessment for Lifestyle-Based Interventions. Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program. Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1