On the question of the specifics of the formulation and use of the Turing test for the ChatGPT

Mikhail Yur'evich Osipov
{"title":"On the question of the specifics of the formulation and use of the Turing test for the ChatGPT","authors":"Mikhail Yur'evich Osipov","doi":"10.7256/2454-0714.2023.4.68680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the research in this article are the features and regularities of the functioning of systems based on ChatGPT technologies, the knowledge of which makes it possible to formulate appropriate modifications of the Turing test, as well as the features and regularities of the formulation and use of the Turing test for systems based on ChatGPT technologies. The purpose of the study is to identify the features and patterns of functioning of systems based on the technologies of ChatGPT, as well as the features and patterns of formulation and use of the Turing test for systems based on the technologies of Chat GPT. As research methods, the method of social experiment was used, when during the study of a system based on Chat GPT technologies, certain questions were asked, answers were received, the analysis of which allowed us to conclude about the features of the \"thinking\" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies. In the course of the study, the following was found. Unlike human thinking, which is based on certain facts, the \"thinking\" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies, in some cases is not based on facts that take place in reality, often the user is given deliberately false information about facts and circumstances that take place in reality. In contrast to human thinking, which is usually systemic in nature, the \"thinking\" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies is disorderly and fragmentary. Systems based on ChatGPT technologies cannot admit their mistakes, and attempts to force systems based on ChatGPT technologies to critically comprehend their answers lead to a malfunction of these systems. The article also provides a Turing test developed by the author for ChatGPT, which made it possible to identify the features of the \"thinking\" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies.","PeriodicalId":471623,"journal":{"name":"Programmnye sistemy i vyčislitelʹnye metody","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Programmnye sistemy i vyčislitelʹnye metody","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0714.2023.4.68680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the research in this article are the features and regularities of the functioning of systems based on ChatGPT technologies, the knowledge of which makes it possible to formulate appropriate modifications of the Turing test, as well as the features and regularities of the formulation and use of the Turing test for systems based on ChatGPT technologies. The purpose of the study is to identify the features and patterns of functioning of systems based on the technologies of ChatGPT, as well as the features and patterns of formulation and use of the Turing test for systems based on the technologies of Chat GPT. As research methods, the method of social experiment was used, when during the study of a system based on Chat GPT technologies, certain questions were asked, answers were received, the analysis of which allowed us to conclude about the features of the "thinking" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies. In the course of the study, the following was found. Unlike human thinking, which is based on certain facts, the "thinking" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies, in some cases is not based on facts that take place in reality, often the user is given deliberately false information about facts and circumstances that take place in reality. In contrast to human thinking, which is usually systemic in nature, the "thinking" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies is disorderly and fragmentary. Systems based on ChatGPT technologies cannot admit their mistakes, and attempts to force systems based on ChatGPT technologies to critically comprehend their answers lead to a malfunction of these systems. The article also provides a Turing test developed by the author for ChatGPT, which made it possible to identify the features of the "thinking" of systems based on ChatGPT technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于图灵测试在ChatGPT中的具体表述和使用问题
本文研究的主题是基于ChatGPT技术的系统的功能特点和规律,这些特点和规律使得对图灵测试的适当修改成为可能,以及基于ChatGPT技术的系统的图灵测试的制定和使用的特点和规律。本研究的目的是识别基于ChatGPT技术的系统的功能特征和模式,以及基于ChatGPT技术的系统的图灵测试的制定和使用的特征和模式。作为研究方法,我们使用了社会实验的方法,在研究一个基于ChatGPT技术的系统的过程中,我们提出了一些问题,得到了一些答案,通过对这些问题的分析,我们可以总结出基于ChatGPT技术的系统的“思维”特征。在研究过程中,发现了以下几点。与人类基于某些事实的思维不同,基于ChatGPT技术的系统的“思维”在某些情况下不是基于现实中发生的事实,通常会故意向用户提供有关现实中发生的事实和情况的错误信息。与人类的思维通常是系统性的相比,基于ChatGPT技术的系统的“思维”是无序和碎片化的。基于ChatGPT技术的系统不能承认他们的错误,并且试图强迫基于ChatGPT技术的系统批判性地理解他们的答案会导致这些系统的故障。本文还提供了作者为ChatGPT开发的图灵测试,它可以识别基于ChatGPT技术的系统的“思维”特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the question of the specifics of the formulation and use of the Turing test for the ChatGPT Development of a Mobile Application of the Student's Study Schedule A single constructive algorithm for constructing foci of second-order curves The research of electrical parameters of threshold detectors About the application of the R-function for geometric modeling of 3D objects of complex shapes in a virtual educational environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1