Thin shell foundations: Quantification of embodied carbon reduction through materially efficient geometry

Kiley Feickert, Caitlin T. Mueller
{"title":"Thin shell foundations: Quantification of embodied carbon reduction through materially efficient geometry","authors":"Kiley Feickert,&nbsp;Caitlin T. Mueller","doi":"10.1007/s44150-023-00101-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Building foundation systems are a significant but understudied contributor to embodied carbon emissions of the built environment, and typically use excess material in prismatic, bending-dominated typologies. This paper identifies and characterizes a promising pathway for reducing the embodied carbon associated with reinforced concrete shallow foundations through an alternative typology, thin shell foundations. The main focus is a quantification and comparison of the environmental impact of typical spread footings and materially efficient shell foundations. Validated analytical engineering equations are applied in a parametric design workflow for the same design load and soil bearing capacity. By iterating through this workflow systematically, insights are gained regarding the applicability of shell foundations to various building typologies and site conditions. Results show that for small column loads and weak soils, shells reduce embodied carbon by about half compared to spread footings. For high applied loads, shells significantly outperform their prismatic counterparts, reducing the environmental impact by almost two-thirds. Foundations are then considered within the context of a whole building structural frame to determine the potential downstream savings when multiple systems are optimized to reduce material use and mass. When floor slabs are shape-optimized in addition to using shell foundations, a building structural system can be constructed for nearly one-quarter of the embodied carbon of a typical system. To take advantage of these potential savings, a method for fabricating thin shell foundations, where earth is compacted and milled to create the formwork, is presented following a review of digital fabrication methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"4 1","pages":"15 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44150-023-00101-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-023-00101-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building foundation systems are a significant but understudied contributor to embodied carbon emissions of the built environment, and typically use excess material in prismatic, bending-dominated typologies. This paper identifies and characterizes a promising pathway for reducing the embodied carbon associated with reinforced concrete shallow foundations through an alternative typology, thin shell foundations. The main focus is a quantification and comparison of the environmental impact of typical spread footings and materially efficient shell foundations. Validated analytical engineering equations are applied in a parametric design workflow for the same design load and soil bearing capacity. By iterating through this workflow systematically, insights are gained regarding the applicability of shell foundations to various building typologies and site conditions. Results show that for small column loads and weak soils, shells reduce embodied carbon by about half compared to spread footings. For high applied loads, shells significantly outperform their prismatic counterparts, reducing the environmental impact by almost two-thirds. Foundations are then considered within the context of a whole building structural frame to determine the potential downstream savings when multiple systems are optimized to reduce material use and mass. When floor slabs are shape-optimized in addition to using shell foundations, a building structural system can be constructed for nearly one-quarter of the embodied carbon of a typical system. To take advantage of these potential savings, a method for fabricating thin shell foundations, where earth is compacted and milled to create the formwork, is presented following a review of digital fabrication methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
薄壳地基:通过高效的几何形状量化内含碳的减少量
建筑地基系统是造成建筑环境内含碳排放量的一个重要因素,但对其的研究却不足,通常在棱柱形、弯曲为主的类型中使用过量材料。本文通过薄壳地基这一替代类型,确定并描述了减少与钢筋混凝土浅基础相关的体现碳排放的可行途径。主要重点是量化和比较典型的扩展基底和高效壳体地基对环境的影响。针对相同的设计荷载和土壤承载力,将经过验证的工程分析方程应用于参数化设计工作流程中。通过系统地迭代这一工作流程,可以深入了解壳体地基对各种建筑类型和场地条件的适用性。结果表明,在柱荷载较小和土壤较弱的情况下,与展脚式地基相比,壳体地基可减少约一半的含碳量。对于高荷载,壳体明显优于棱柱式地基,对环境的影响几乎减少了三分之二。然后,在整个建筑结构框架的背景下考虑地基,以确定当优化多个系统以减少材料使用和质量时,下游节约的潜力。如果除了使用壳体地基外,还对楼板进行形状优化,那么建造一个建筑结构系统所需的含碳量几乎只有典型系统的四分之一。为了利用这些潜在的节约优势,在对数字制造方法进行回顾后,介绍了一种制造薄壳地基的方法,即通过压实和碾压泥土来制造模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of natural fibre pultruded profiles in diverse lightweight structures and architectural scenarios Mass housing in transition: innovability in large-scale housing complexes A multi-criteria decision support framework for designing seismic and thermal resilient facades Flexural behavior of natural fiber-reinforced foamed concrete beams From decay analysis to conservation plan of post-Vatican II religious architecture: Research on the Church of the Holy Family by Paolo Portoghesi in Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1