Chris Penlington, Pattramon Pornsukjantra, Paul Chazot, Frances Cole, Diarmuid Denneny
{"title":"Confidence of practitioners to support self-management of pain: A multidisciplinary survey","authors":"Chris Penlington, Pattramon Pornsukjantra, Paul Chazot, Frances Cole, Diarmuid Denneny","doi":"10.1177/20494637231212748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Supported self-management is an important component of management for persistent pain according to current recommendations and guidelines. However, it is unclear whether staff from differing disciplines who may be in early contact with people with established or developing persistent pain are confident to introduce and support self-management for this patient group. Aim To determine the confidence of staff across professional disciplines to introduce and support self-management. Design and Setting Cross-sectional online survey. Methods Charts were constructed to represent information on professional grouping, prior training in self-management and confidence in supporting key components of self-management for persistent pain. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences between groups. Results Overall, 165 practitioners reported confidence to support self-management below the midpoint of a ten-point scale and 93 above. There were few differences between different professions apart from in explaining pain (f = 6.879 p < .001), managing activity levels (f = 6.340 p < .001) and supporting healthy habits (f = 4.700, p = .001) in which physiotherapists expressed higher confidence than other professional groups. There was no difference in confidence expressed between staff who had or had not received previous training in self-management (f = 1.357, p = .233). Conclusions Many front-line staff who might be expected to introduce and deliver self-management support for persistent pain lack the confidence and skills to do so. This is consistent with a known lack of education about pain across disciplinary boundaries in primary and community-based care. In order to meet treatment priorities for persistent pain there is an urgent need to upskill the workforce by providing access to good quality training and resources.","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231212748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Supported self-management is an important component of management for persistent pain according to current recommendations and guidelines. However, it is unclear whether staff from differing disciplines who may be in early contact with people with established or developing persistent pain are confident to introduce and support self-management for this patient group. Aim To determine the confidence of staff across professional disciplines to introduce and support self-management. Design and Setting Cross-sectional online survey. Methods Charts were constructed to represent information on professional grouping, prior training in self-management and confidence in supporting key components of self-management for persistent pain. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences between groups. Results Overall, 165 practitioners reported confidence to support self-management below the midpoint of a ten-point scale and 93 above. There were few differences between different professions apart from in explaining pain (f = 6.879 p < .001), managing activity levels (f = 6.340 p < .001) and supporting healthy habits (f = 4.700, p = .001) in which physiotherapists expressed higher confidence than other professional groups. There was no difference in confidence expressed between staff who had or had not received previous training in self-management (f = 1.357, p = .233). Conclusions Many front-line staff who might be expected to introduce and deliver self-management support for persistent pain lack the confidence and skills to do so. This is consistent with a known lack of education about pain across disciplinary boundaries in primary and community-based care. In order to meet treatment priorities for persistent pain there is an urgent need to upskill the workforce by providing access to good quality training and resources.
背景:根据目前的建议和指南,支持性自我管理是持续性疼痛管理的重要组成部分。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,来自不同学科的工作人员是否有信心为这一患者群体介绍和支持自我管理,这些工作人员可能在早期接触到已有或正在发展的持续性疼痛患者。目的确定各专业人员引入和支持自我管理的信心。设计与设置横断面在线调查。方法构建图表,反映专业分组、先前自我管理培训和对支持持续疼痛自我管理关键组成部分的信心。方差分析用于检验组间差异。结果总体而言,165名从业人员对支持自我管理的信心低于10分制的中点,93名从业人员高于10分制的中点。不同职业之间除了对疼痛的解释差异不大(f = 6.879 p <.001),管理活动水平(f = 6.340 p <.001)和支持健康习惯(f = 4.700, p = .001)在这方面,物理治疗师比其他专业群体表现出更高的信心。在之前接受过或没有接受过自我管理培训的员工之间,信心表达没有差异(f = 1.357, p = 0.233)。结论许多一线工作人员可能会对持续性疼痛进行自我管理支持,但他们缺乏这样做的信心和技能。这与在初级和社区护理中缺乏跨学科疼痛教育是一致的。为了满足对持续性疼痛的优先治疗,迫切需要通过提供高质量的培训和资源来提高工作人员的技能。
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.