Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1177/20494637241312070
Jenna L Gillett, Arman Rakhimov, Paige Karadag, Kristy Themelis, Chen Ji, Nicole Ky Tang
Objectives: Validate the English version of the Self-CompassionScale Short-Form (SCS-SF) as a reliable measure in chronic pain. Explore self-compassion's relationship with pain-related outcomes.
Methods: A total of 240 chronic pain patients (at 6-months) and 256 community participants (at 12-months) completed two prospective survey studies. SCS-SF psychometric properties were evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), test-retest reliability (Pearson's r) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) in both samples. Convergent validity/clinical relevance was assessed in the chronic pain sample via univariate linear regressions between self-compassion and pain intensity, interference, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, anxiety and depression.
Results: The SCS-SF showed acceptable internal consistency in both samples (α > 0.70, range = 0.74-0.79), high test-retest reliability over 6-months in the pain sample (r = 0.81, p < .001) and sub-threshold over 12-months in the community (r = 0.59 p < .001). EFA revealed a two-factor model distinguishing compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding in both samples. CFA identified a one-factor and two-factor model in both samples, but it did not meet statistical thresholds. ESEM identified the best fit for the chronic pain group was for a two-factor model (RMSEA and SRMR < 0.08; CFI and TLI > 0.90), whereas no models met acceptable fit criteria in the community group. A two-bifactor Bayesian model had suitable fit in both groups. In the chronic pain sample, SCS-SF and compassionate self-responding negatively predicted pain intensity, interference, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing and positively predicted self-efficacy over 6-months. Uncompassionate self-responding positively predicted anxiety, depression, catastrophizing and negatively predicted self-efficacy but did not predict pain outcomes.
Discussion: The SCS-SF is a reliable and valid measure in chronic pain. Total and sub-factor scores appear to have distinct relationships with pain outcomes. Future research should consider self-compassion as a unitary and/or bifactorial (consisting of compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding) construct in chronic pain when measured using the SCS-SF.
{"title":"Self-compassion in chronic pain: Validating the self-compassion scale short-form and exploring initial relationships with pain outcomes.","authors":"Jenna L Gillett, Arman Rakhimov, Paige Karadag, Kristy Themelis, Chen Ji, Nicole Ky Tang","doi":"10.1177/20494637241312070","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241312070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Validate the English version of the <i>Self-C</i> <i>ompassion</i> <i>Scale S</i> <i>hort-F</i> <i>orm</i> (SCS-SF) as a reliable measure in chronic pain. Explore self-compassion's relationship with pain-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 240 chronic pain patients (at 6-months) and 256 community participants (at 12-months) completed two prospective survey studies. SCS-SF psychometric properties were evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), test-retest reliability (Pearson's r) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) in both samples. Convergent validity/clinical relevance was assessed in the chronic pain sample via univariate linear regressions between self-compassion and pain intensity, interference, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SCS-SF showed acceptable internal consistency in both samples (α > 0.70, range = 0.74-0.79), high test-retest reliability over 6-months in the pain sample (r = 0.81, <i>p</i> < .001) and sub-threshold over 12-months in the community (r = 0.59 <i>p</i> < .001). EFA revealed a two-factor model distinguishing compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding in both samples. CFA identified a one-factor and two-factor model in both samples, but it did not meet statistical thresholds. ESEM identified the best fit for the chronic pain group was for a two-factor model (RMSEA and SRMR < 0.08; CFI and TLI > 0.90), whereas no models met acceptable fit criteria in the community group. A two-bifactor Bayesian model had suitable fit in both groups. In the chronic pain sample, SCS-SF and compassionate self-responding negatively predicted pain intensity, interference, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing and positively predicted self-efficacy over 6-months. Uncompassionate self-responding positively predicted anxiety, depression, catastrophizing and negatively predicted self-efficacy but did not predict pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SCS-SF is a reliable and valid measure in chronic pain. Total and sub-factor scores appear to have distinct relationships with pain outcomes. Future research should consider self-compassion as a unitary and/or bifactorial (consisting of compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding) construct in chronic pain when measured using the SCS-SF.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241312070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707776/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1177/20494637241311456
Lydia V Tidmarsh, Richard Harrison, Harriet Wilkinson, Megan Harrington, Katherine A Finlay
Objectives: Waitlists for pain management services are often extensive, risking psychological and physical decline and patient non-engagement in treatment once accessed. Currently, for outpatient pain management, no standardised waiting list interventions exist, resulting in passive waiting. To arrest prospective wait-related decline(s), this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to pain self-management while waiting, forming the foundation for a waitlist intervention development.
Design: An inductive qualitative approach was utilised to explore the barriers and drivers of pain self-management while waiting for chronic pain management.
Method: Semi-structured interviews, underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model, were conducted with people waiting for pain management services (N = 38). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed via reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: The analysis demonstrated four thematised barriers and one facilitator: (1) Shunted Around the System (barrier); (2) The Information Gap (barrier); (3) Resisting Adaptation (barrier); (4) Losing Hope (barrier); and (5) Help Yourself or Lose Yourself (facilitator).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the severe emotional and motivational impact of waiting, increasing treatment disengagement. The waitlist represents a prime opportunity for prehabilitation to protect wellbeing and optimise self-management engagement. Infrastructural and interpersonal barriers of poor communication and healthcare professional pain invalidation must be addressed to improve emotional wellbeing and motivation to engage with planned treatment. Enhancing self-efficacy, pain acceptance, self-compassion, and internal HLOC are fundamental to increasing pain self-management. These can all be met within a prehabilitation framework. This study is foundational for the development of psychological prehabilitation in outpatient chronic pain management.
{"title":"Activating waitlists: Identifying barriers and facilitators to pain self-management while waiting.","authors":"Lydia V Tidmarsh, Richard Harrison, Harriet Wilkinson, Megan Harrington, Katherine A Finlay","doi":"10.1177/20494637241311456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241311456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Waitlists for pain management services are often extensive, risking psychological and physical decline and patient non-engagement in treatment once accessed. Currently, for outpatient pain management, no standardised waiting list interventions exist, resulting in passive waiting. To arrest prospective wait-related decline(s), this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to pain self-management while waiting, forming the foundation for a waitlist intervention development.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An inductive qualitative approach was utilised to explore the barriers and drivers of pain self-management while waiting for chronic pain management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews, underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model, were conducted with people waiting for pain management services (<i>N</i> = 38). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed via reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis demonstrated four thematised barriers and one facilitator: (1) Shunted Around the System <i>(barrier)</i>; (2) The Information Gap <i>(barrier)</i>; (3) Resisting Adaptation (<i>barrier</i>); (4) Losing Hope (<i>barrier);</i> and (5) Help Yourself or Lose Yourself <i>(facilitator)</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the severe emotional and motivational impact of waiting, increasing treatment disengagement. The waitlist represents a prime opportunity for prehabilitation to protect wellbeing and optimise self-management engagement. Infrastructural and interpersonal barriers of poor communication and healthcare professional pain invalidation must be addressed to improve emotional wellbeing and motivation to engage with planned treatment. Enhancing self-efficacy, pain acceptance, self-compassion, and internal HLOC are fundamental to increasing pain self-management. These can all be met within a prehabilitation framework. This study is foundational for the development of psychological prehabilitation in outpatient chronic pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241311456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-05DOI: 10.1177/20494637241311784
Allan Botura Brennecke, Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, Liliane Lins-Kusterer, Liana Maria Torres de Araujo Azi, Durval Kraychete
Introduction: Experimental evidence supports the hypothesis of reciprocal influence between neural systems involved in cognition and central pain processing circuits. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated bidirectional communication between central pain processing areas and the immune system, leading to changes in behaviour, sensory perception, mood, and cognition. However, the academic community has not yet reached a consensus on whether effective analgesic interventions can mitigate or reverse cognitive deterioration.
Methods: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of various therapeutic interventions in improving cognitive functions (primary outcome) and altering the profile of immunological markers (secondary outcome) in chronic pain patients. The review was limited to randomised controlled trials addressing chronic pain of any aetiology, with searches conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases.
Results: The qualitative synthesis of twelve studies conducted between 2003 and 2021, involving 1432 participants in experimental (n = 950) and control (n = 482) groups, revealed some interesting patterns. Only half of the studies (6/12) reported cognitive improvement, with attention being the most analysed cognitive domain, followed by memory and executive function. Fibromyalgia was the most studied aetiology of chronic pain. The strategies of intervention/treatment and durations varied widely; however, milnacipran versus placebo emerged as the most frequently employed intervention. Only one study reported immunological markers, limiting the evaluation of this outcome.
Conclusion: Based on this analysis, it is not possible to affirm that interventions targeting chronic pain improve cognition. This review suggests new research directions and calls for more robust methodological approaches.
{"title":"Impact of different treatments for chronic pain on cognitive function: A systematic review.","authors":"Allan Botura Brennecke, Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, Liliane Lins-Kusterer, Liana Maria Torres de Araujo Azi, Durval Kraychete","doi":"10.1177/20494637241311784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241311784","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Experimental evidence supports the hypothesis of reciprocal influence between neural systems involved in cognition and central pain processing circuits. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated bidirectional communication between central pain processing areas and the immune system, leading to changes in behaviour, sensory perception, mood, and cognition. However, the academic community has not yet reached a consensus on whether effective analgesic interventions can mitigate or reverse cognitive deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of various therapeutic interventions in improving cognitive functions (primary outcome) and altering the profile of immunological markers (secondary outcome) in chronic pain patients. The review was limited to randomised controlled trials addressing chronic pain of any aetiology, with searches conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative synthesis of twelve studies conducted between 2003 and 2021, involving 1432 participants in experimental (<i>n</i> = 950) and control (<i>n</i> = 482) groups, revealed some interesting patterns. Only half of the studies (6/12) reported cognitive improvement, with attention being the most analysed cognitive domain, followed by memory and executive function. Fibromyalgia was the most studied aetiology of chronic pain. The strategies of intervention/treatment and durations varied widely; however, milnacipran versus placebo emerged as the most frequently employed intervention. Only one study reported immunological markers, limiting the evaluation of this outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this analysis, it is not possible to affirm that interventions targeting chronic pain improve cognition. This review suggests new research directions and calls for more robust methodological approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241311784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although spinal cord stimulator (SCS) therapy is generally used safely to treat chronic neuropathic pain conditions, this document highlights the less reported complication of unusual neurological problems including headaches. These developed temporally after the initiation of SCS therapy despite initial positive response to pain. The mechanisms might include activation of trigeminal receptors and neuroplasticity after SCS. We present a series of four cases where patients developed new neurological symptoms like headaches, facial twitching, and tinnitus, that were related to SCS activation. Despite adjustments to the SCS settings and extensive evaluations, these symptoms persisted in all cases, leading to the decision to explant SCS which was otherwise helping pain.
{"title":"A case series of new-onset headache and neurological issues after thoracolumbar spinal cord stimulators.","authors":"Ramkumar Kalaiyarasan, Hemkumar Pushparaj, Manohar Sharma","doi":"10.1177/20494637241310705","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241310705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although spinal cord stimulator (SCS) therapy is generally used safely to treat chronic neuropathic pain conditions, this document highlights the less reported complication of unusual neurological problems including headaches. These developed temporally after the initiation of SCS therapy despite initial positive response to pain. The mechanisms might include activation of trigeminal receptors and neuroplasticity after SCS. We present a series of four cases where patients developed new neurological symptoms like headaches, facial twitching, and tinnitus, that were related to SCS activation. Despite adjustments to the SCS settings and extensive evaluations, these symptoms persisted in all cases, leading to the decision to explant SCS which was otherwise helping pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241310705"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Chronic pain poses a significant public health challenge. We present the global and regional data on Prevalence, Incidence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) for Chronic pain from the Global burden of disease (GBD) study 2019 data and analyze their associations with Socio-demographic index (SDI), age, and gender, and the future trends from 2020 to 2035.
Methods: Regional trends in the burden of chronic pain and its association with age, gender, and SDI were assessed from 1990 to 2019. Joinpoint analysis was employed to describe trends in chronic pain burden across different SDI regions. Additionally, the Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort model (BAPC) was used for predicting future trends. Age-standardized rates (ASRs) of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs were employed to quantify the burden of chronic pain.
Results: Between 1990 and 2019, a significant increase was observed in global prevalence and YLDs rates of chronic pain. Higher rates were found among females, whereas a faster rise was noted among males. Notably, Low Back Pain (LBP) and Migraine accounted for predominant YLDs globally, particularly among those aged 75 and above. A notable prevalence of Tension-type Headache (TTH) was observed among younger populations. Furthermore, ASRs for chronic pain were highest in high-SDI regions. Projections suggest an increase in headache ASRs globally for both genders from 2020 to 2035.
Conclusion: From 1990 to 2019, the global burden of chronic pain increased significantly, with projections indicating a continued rise in headache burden over the next 15 years, underscoring the need for heightened attention to these issues.
{"title":"Global and regional trends and projections of chronic pain from 1990 to 2035: Analyses based on global burden of diseases study 2019.","authors":"Mengyi Zhu, Jiarui Zhang, Diefei Liang, Junxiong Qiu, Yuan Fu, Zhaopei Zeng, Jingjun Han, Junmeng Zheng, Liling Lin","doi":"10.1177/20494637241310697","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241310697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain poses a significant public health challenge. We present the global and regional data on Prevalence, Incidence and Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) for Chronic pain from the Global burden of disease (GBD) study 2019 data and analyze their associations with Socio-demographic index (SDI), age, and gender, and the future trends from 2020 to 2035.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regional trends in the burden of chronic pain and its association with age, gender, and SDI were assessed from 1990 to 2019. Joinpoint analysis was employed to describe trends in chronic pain burden across different SDI regions. Additionally, the Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort model (BAPC) was used for predicting future trends. Age-standardized rates (ASRs) of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs were employed to quantify the burden of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1990 and 2019, a significant increase was observed in global prevalence and YLDs rates of chronic pain. Higher rates were found among females, whereas a faster rise was noted among males. Notably, Low Back Pain (LBP) and Migraine accounted for predominant YLDs globally, particularly among those aged 75 and above. A notable prevalence of Tension-type Headache (TTH) was observed among younger populations. Furthermore, ASRs for chronic pain were highest in high-SDI regions. Projections suggest an increase in headache ASRs globally for both genders from 2020 to 2035.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 1990 to 2019, the global burden of chronic pain increased significantly, with projections indicating a continued rise in headache burden over the next 15 years, underscoring the need for heightened attention to these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241310697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1177/20494637241302391
Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, Roberta Caiazza, Emilia Pawlowska, Quoc Vuong
Background: Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy, usually involving dogs, as a way to reduce pain in inpatient and outpatient populations. Here two studies investigate the effectiveness of interacting with horses for reducing human acute pain perception.
Methods: In Study 1, a blood-pressure cuff was used to administer acute ischaemic pain to 70 adult participants, who were allocated to one of three groups: Equine Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), Horse Interaction without EAP (HI), and a Control (no horses present). All participants engaged in an activity (finding a horse treat) in a large, enclosed arena. The dependent variable was the subjective pain rating (scale 0-10) of the participant in response to moderate pain induced pre- and post-activity. In Study 2, 53 adult participants were recruited and allocated to either an Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) Group or a Control Group. The same paradigm was used. Following the activity sessions, qualitative data was elicited from the participants regarding their insights and feelings. It was hypothesized that any interaction with horses would significantly reduce an individual's perception of pain.
Results: In both studies, planned paired-samples t-tests showed significant reductions in pain ratings from pre-activity to post-activity in the EAL, EAP and HI groups (large and medium effect sizes) but not the Control groups. Thematic analysis of the qualitative responses showed an overwhelmingly positive array of responses from those who interacted with the horses, for example, feeling relaxed and happy during the activity.
Conclusion: Interactions with horses can reduce acute pain perception. Distraction, physiological changes, and positive emotions are discussed as possible underlying mechanisms. It remains to be seen how this could be more widely applied, for example, in relation to chronic pain.
{"title":"Impact of equine interactions on human acute pain perception: Two cross sectional studies.","authors":"Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, Roberta Caiazza, Emilia Pawlowska, Quoc Vuong","doi":"10.1177/20494637241302391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241302391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy, usually involving dogs, as a way to reduce pain in inpatient and outpatient populations. Here two studies investigate the effectiveness of interacting with horses for reducing human acute pain perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Study 1, a blood-pressure cuff was used to administer acute ischaemic pain to 70 adult participants, who were allocated to one of three groups: Equine Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), Horse Interaction without EAP (HI), and a Control (no horses present). All participants engaged in an activity (finding a horse treat) in a large, enclosed arena. The dependent variable was the subjective pain rating (scale 0-10) of the participant in response to moderate pain induced pre- and post-activity. In Study 2, 53 adult participants were recruited and allocated to either an Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) Group or a Control Group. The same paradigm was used. Following the activity sessions, qualitative data was elicited from the participants regarding their insights and feelings. It was hypothesized that any interaction with horses would significantly reduce an individual's perception of pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both studies, planned paired-samples t-tests showed significant reductions in pain ratings from pre-activity to post-activity in the EAL, EAP and HI groups (large and medium effect sizes) but not the Control groups. Thematic analysis of the qualitative responses showed an overwhelmingly positive array of responses from those who interacted with the horses, for example, feeling relaxed and happy during the activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interactions with horses can reduce acute pain perception. Distraction, physiological changes, and positive emotions are discussed as possible underlying mechanisms. It remains to be seen how this could be more widely applied, for example, in relation to chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241302391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607707/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pain from rib fractures often requires inpatient management with opioid medication. The need for ongoing opioid prescriptions following hospital discharge is poorly understood. Harms associated with long-term opioid use are generally accepted. However, a deeper understanding of current prescribing patterns in this population at-risk is required.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of adult patients hospitalised in Queensland, Australia between 2014 and 2015 with rib fractures (ICD-10-AM: S22.3, S22.4, S22.5), was obtained from the Community Opioid Dispensing after Injury (CODI) study, which includes person-linked hospitalisation, mortality and community opioid dispensing data. Data were extracted 90-days prior to the index-hospitalisation and 720-days after discharge. Factors associated with long-duration (>90 days cumulatively) and increased end-dose were examined using multivariable logistic regressions, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Results: In total, 4306 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 58.8% had opioids dispensed in the community within 30 days of hospital discharge. 23.6% had long-duration dispensing and 13.7% increased opioid end-doses. Pre-injury opioid use was most associated with long-duration (OR = 12.00, 95% CI 8.99-16.01) and increased end-dose (OR = 9.00, 95% CI 6.75-12.00). Females and older persons had higher odds of long-duration dispensing (Females OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22; Age 65+ OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.61). Injury severity and presence of concurrent injuries were not statistically significantly associated with duration or dose (p > .05). Subsequent hospitalisations and death during the follow-up period had statistically significant associations with long-duration and increased end-dose (p < .001).
Conclusion: Opiate prescribing following rib fractures is prolonged in older, and female patients, beyond the traditionally reported recovery time frames requiring analgesia. Previous opioid use (without dependence) is associated with long-duration opioid use and increased end-dose in rib fracture patients. These results support the need for a collaborative health system approach and individualised strategies for high-risk patients with rib fractures to reduce long-term opiate use.
Level of evidence: Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.
背景:肋骨骨折引起的疼痛通常需要住院患者使用阿片类药物进行治疗。人们对出院后是否需要继续处方阿片类药物知之甚少。长期使用阿片类药物的危害已被普遍接受。然而,我们需要更深入地了解这一高危人群目前的处方模式:从 "受伤后社区阿片类药物配药"(CODI)研究中获得了 2014 年至 2015 年期间在澳大利亚昆士兰州因肋骨骨折(ICD-10-AM:S22.3、S22.4、S22.5)住院的成年患者的回顾性队列,其中包括与个人相关的住院、死亡和社区阿片类药物配药数据。数据提取时间为指数住院前 90 天和出院后 720 天。使用多变量逻辑回归、几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)研究了与长期用药(累计超过 90 天)和最终用药量增加相关的因素:共有 4306 名患者符合纳入标准,58.8% 的患者在出院后 30 天内在社区配发了阿片类药物。23.6%的患者长期使用阿片类药物,13.7%的患者增加了阿片类药物的最终用量。受伤前使用阿片类药物与长期使用(OR = 12.00,95% CI 8.99-16.01)和最终剂量增加(OR = 9.00,95% CI 6.75-12.00)关系最大。女性和老年人长期配药的几率更高(女性 OR = 1.75,95% CI 1.38-2.22;65 岁以上 OR = 1.86,95% CI 1.32-2.61)。受伤严重程度和是否同时受伤与持续时间或剂量无明显统计学关联(P > .05)。随访期间的后续住院和死亡与持续时间长和最终剂量增加有统计学意义(p < .001):结论:年龄较大的女性患者在肋骨骨折后使用阿片类药物的时间较长,超过了传统报告的需要镇痛的恢复时间。曾使用阿片类药物(无依赖性)与肋骨骨折患者长期使用阿片类药物和最终用量增加有关。这些结果支持了对肋骨骨折高危患者采取医疗系统协作方法和个性化策略的必要性,以减少阿片类药物的长期使用:III级,预后/流行病学。
{"title":"Community opioid dispensing after rib fracture injuries: CODI study.","authors":"Frances Williamson, Melanie Proper, Rania Shibl, Susanna Cramb, Victoria McCreanor, Jacelle Warren, Cate Cameron","doi":"10.1177/20494637241300264","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241300264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain from rib fractures often requires inpatient management with opioid medication. The need for ongoing opioid prescriptions following hospital discharge is poorly understood. Harms associated with long-term opioid use are generally accepted. However, a deeper understanding of current prescribing patterns in this population at-risk is required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of adult patients hospitalised in Queensland, Australia between 2014 and 2015 with rib fractures (ICD-10-AM: S22.3, S22.4, S22.5), was obtained from the Community Opioid Dispensing after Injury (CODI) study, which includes person-linked hospitalisation, mortality and community opioid dispensing data. Data were extracted 90-days prior to the index-hospitalisation and 720-days after discharge. Factors associated with long-duration (>90 days cumulatively) and increased end-dose were examined using multivariable logistic regressions, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4306 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 58.8% had opioids dispensed in the community within 30 days of hospital discharge. 23.6% had long-duration dispensing and 13.7% increased opioid end-doses. Pre-injury opioid use was most associated with long-duration (OR = 12.00, 95% CI 8.99-16.01) and increased end-dose (OR = 9.00, 95% CI 6.75-12.00). Females and older persons had higher odds of long-duration dispensing (Females OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22; Age 65+ OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.61). Injury severity and presence of concurrent injuries were not statistically significantly associated with duration or dose (<i>p</i> > .05). Subsequent hospitalisations and death during the follow-up period had statistically significant associations with long-duration and increased end-dose (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opiate prescribing following rib fractures is prolonged in older, and female patients, beyond the traditionally reported recovery time frames requiring analgesia. Previous opioid use (without dependence) is associated with long-duration opioid use and increased end-dose in rib fracture patients. These results support the need for a collaborative health system approach and individualised strategies for high-risk patients with rib fractures to reduce long-term opiate use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241300264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Some patients with postoperative hip fractures (HF) experience persistent severe pain. In this longitudinal study, we examined the characteristics of patients with persistent pain after HF surgery, and the factors influencing pain intensity.
Methods: We conducted an 8-week prospective study in patients with postsurgical HF. Verbal rating scale (VRS), and multifaceted outcomes, including pressure pain threshold (PPT) (affected site and biceps), were evaluated at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Patients were divided into mild (VRS ≤1) and severe (VRS ≥2) groups according to pain intensity at 8 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA and decision-tree analysis.
Results: VRS, PPT at the affected site and biceps, and physical activity (PA) time were significantly lower in the severe group than in the mild group 2 weeks postoperatively. VRS, PPT at the affected site, pain catastrophizing (PCS)-13, and the Tampa Scale for Kineshiophobia (TSK)-11 did not show significant improvements in the severe group. Decision tree analysis revealed that the VRS and PCS-13 at 4 weeks, PA time at 2 weeks, and TSK-11 change between 4 weeks and 2 weeks were factors influencing severe pain intensity at 8 weeks after HF surgery.
Conclusion: Persistent severe pain after HF surgery was characterised by high peripheral and central sensitisation, pain catastrophizing, and reduced PA at 2 weeks after HF surgery. In addition, early pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and PA may be hierarchically influential factors for persistent pain 8 weeks after HF surgery.
{"title":"Persistent postsurgical pain in hip fracture patients. A prospective longitudinal study with multifaceted assessment.","authors":"Yutaro Nomoto, Yuki Nishi, Koichi Nakagawa, Kyo Goto, Yutaro Kondo, Junichiro Yamashita, Kaoru Morita, Hideki Kataoka, Junya Sakamoto, Minoru Okita","doi":"10.1177/20494637241300385","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241300385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some patients with postoperative hip fractures (HF) experience persistent severe pain. In this longitudinal study, we examined the characteristics of patients with persistent pain after HF surgery, and the factors influencing pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an 8-week prospective study in patients with postsurgical HF. Verbal rating scale (VRS), and multifaceted outcomes, including pressure pain threshold (PPT) (affected site and biceps), were evaluated at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. Patients were divided into mild (VRS ≤1) and severe (VRS ≥2) groups according to pain intensity at 8 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA and decision-tree analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VRS, PPT at the affected site and biceps, and physical activity (PA) time were significantly lower in the severe group than in the mild group 2 weeks postoperatively. VRS, PPT at the affected site, pain catastrophizing (PCS)-13, and the Tampa Scale for Kineshiophobia (TSK)-11 did not show significant improvements in the severe group. Decision tree analysis revealed that the VRS and PCS-13 at 4 weeks, PA time at 2 weeks, and TSK-11 change between 4 weeks and 2 weeks were factors influencing severe pain intensity at 8 weeks after HF surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persistent severe pain after HF surgery was characterised by high peripheral and central sensitisation, pain catastrophizing, and reduced PA at 2 weeks after HF surgery. In addition, early pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and PA may be hierarchically influential factors for persistent pain 8 weeks after HF surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241300385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559712/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1177/20494637241298246
Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Breda Eubank, Arianna Waye, Jason Werle, Richard Walker, David A Hart, David M Sheps, Geoff Schneider, Tim Takahashi, Tracy Wasylak, Mel Slomp
Objectives: To 1) estimate the utilization and costs of physician and diagnostic imaging (DI) services for shoulder, knee, and low-back pain (LBP) conditions; and 2) examine determinants of the utilization and costs of these services.
Methods: All patients visiting a physician for shoulder, knee, or LBP conditions (identified by the ICD-9 codes) in Alberta, Canada, in fiscal year (FY) 2022/2023 were included. Interested outcomes included numbers and costs of physician visits and DI exams stratified by condition, physician specialty, DI modality, and patients' sex and age. Multivariate regressions were used to examine determinants of the outcomes.
Results: In FY 2022/2023, 10.4%, 7.0%, and 6.7% of the population saw physicians for shoulder, knee, and LBP conditions, respectively. This costs Alberta $307.04 million ($67.93 per capita), of which shoulder accounted for 41%, knee 28%, and LBP 31%. In the same FY, 17,734 computed tomography (CT), 43,939 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 686 ultrasound (US), and 170,936 X-ray exams related to shoulder/knee/LBP conditions were ordered for these patients, costing another $29.07 million, of which CT accounted for 14%, MRI 48%, US 0%, and X-ray 37%. Female, older age, comorbidity scores, and capital zone used physician services more frequently. Patients with a higher comorbidity index scores or more physician visits were more likely being referred for CT or MRI.
Conclusion: Musculoskeletal conditions are common and result in patients seeking healthcare services. Visits to family physicians, specialists, and the ordering of DI contribute to extensive utilization of health services, contributing to considerable health system costs.
{"title":"Costs of physician and diagnostic imaging services for shoulder, knee, and low back pain conditions: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada.","authors":"Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Breda Eubank, Arianna Waye, Jason Werle, Richard Walker, David A Hart, David M Sheps, Geoff Schneider, Tim Takahashi, Tracy Wasylak, Mel Slomp","doi":"10.1177/20494637241298246","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241298246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To 1) estimate the utilization and costs of physician and diagnostic imaging (DI) services for shoulder, knee, and low-back pain (LBP) conditions; and 2) examine determinants of the utilization and costs of these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients visiting a physician for shoulder, knee, or LBP conditions (identified by the ICD-9 codes) in Alberta, Canada, in fiscal year (FY) 2022/2023 were included. Interested outcomes included numbers and costs of physician visits and DI exams stratified by condition, physician specialty, DI modality, and patients' sex and age. Multivariate regressions were used to examine determinants of the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In FY 2022/2023, 10.4%, 7.0%, and 6.7% of the population saw physicians for shoulder, knee, and LBP conditions, respectively. This costs Alberta $307.04 million ($67.93 per capita), of which shoulder accounted for 41%, knee 28%, and LBP 31%. In the same FY, 17,734 computed tomography (CT), 43,939 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 686 ultrasound (US), and 170,936 X-ray exams related to shoulder/knee/LBP conditions were ordered for these patients, costing another $29.07 million, of which CT accounted for 14%, MRI 48%, US 0%, and X-ray 37%. Female, older age, comorbidity scores, and capital zone used physician services more frequently. Patients with a higher comorbidity index scores or more physician visits were more likely being referred for CT or MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Musculoskeletal conditions are common and result in patients seeking healthcare services. Visits to family physicians, specialists, and the ordering of DI contribute to extensive utilization of health services, contributing to considerable health system costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241298246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1177/20494637241297274
Daniela Ghio, Sarah Peters
{"title":"The value of social relationships in the biopsychosocial model of pain.","authors":"Daniela Ghio, Sarah Peters","doi":"10.1177/20494637241297274","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20494637241297274","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637241297274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}