Fatal structure fire classification from building fire data using machine learning

IF 2.2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1108/ijicc-07-2023-0167
Vimala Balakrishnan, Aainaa Nadia Mohammed Hashim, Voon Chung Lee, Voon Hee Lee, Ying Qiu Lee
{"title":"Fatal structure fire classification from building fire data using machine learning","authors":"Vimala Balakrishnan, Aainaa Nadia Mohammed Hashim, Voon Chung Lee, Voon Hee Lee, Ying Qiu Lee","doi":"10.1108/ijicc-07-2023-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to develop a machine learning model to detect structure fire fatalities using a dataset comprising 11,341 cases from 2011 to 2019. Design/methodology/approach Exploratory data analysis (EDA) was conducted prior to modelling, in which ten machine learning models were experimented with. Findings The main fatal structure fire risk factors were fires originating from bedrooms, living areas and the cooking/dining areas. The highest fatality rate (20.69%) was reported for fires ignited due to bedding (23.43%), despite a low fire incident rate (3.50%). Using 21 structure fire features, Random Forest (RF) yielded the best detection performance with 86% accuracy, followed by Decision Tree (DT) with bagging (accuracy = 84.7%). Research limitations/practical implications Limitations of the study are pertaining to data quality and grouping of categories in the data pre-processing stage, which could affect the performance of the models. Originality/value The study is the first of its kind to manipulate risk factors to detect fatal structure classification, particularly focussing on structure fire fatalities. Most of the previous studies examined the importance of fire risk factors and their relationship to the fire risk level.","PeriodicalId":45291,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-07-2023-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop a machine learning model to detect structure fire fatalities using a dataset comprising 11,341 cases from 2011 to 2019. Design/methodology/approach Exploratory data analysis (EDA) was conducted prior to modelling, in which ten machine learning models were experimented with. Findings The main fatal structure fire risk factors were fires originating from bedrooms, living areas and the cooking/dining areas. The highest fatality rate (20.69%) was reported for fires ignited due to bedding (23.43%), despite a low fire incident rate (3.50%). Using 21 structure fire features, Random Forest (RF) yielded the best detection performance with 86% accuracy, followed by Decision Tree (DT) with bagging (accuracy = 84.7%). Research limitations/practical implications Limitations of the study are pertaining to data quality and grouping of categories in the data pre-processing stage, which could affect the performance of the models. Originality/value The study is the first of its kind to manipulate risk factors to detect fatal structure classification, particularly focussing on structure fire fatalities. Most of the previous studies examined the importance of fire risk factors and their relationship to the fire risk level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习从建筑火灾数据中进行致命结构火灾分类
本研究旨在利用包含2011年至2019年11,341个案例的数据集开发一个机器学习模型,以检测建筑火灾死亡人数。设计/方法/方法在建模之前进行探索性数据分析(EDA),其中实验了10个机器学习模型。发现建筑物火灾的主要危险因素为卧室、起居区和烹饪/用餐区。尽管火灾事故率较低(3.50%),但床上用品引发的火灾死亡率最高(20.69%)(23.43%)。使用21个结构火灾特征,随机森林(Random Forest, RF)的检测效果最好,准确率为86%,其次是决策树(Decision Tree, DT)和套袋(bagging),准确率为84.7%。研究局限性/实际意义本研究的局限性在于数据预处理阶段的数据质量和类别分组,这可能会影响模型的性能。独创性/价值该研究首次通过操纵危险因素来检测致命结构分类,特别关注结构火灾的死亡人数。以往的研究大多考察了火灾危险因素的重要性及其与火灾危险水平的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
X-News dataset for online news categorization X-News dataset for online news categorization A novel ensemble causal feature selection approach with mutual information and group fusion strategy for multi-label data Contextualized dynamic meta embeddings based on Gated CNNs and self-attention for Arabic machine translation Dynamic community detection algorithm based on hyperbolic graph convolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1