Fitness landscape analysis of the simple assembly line balancing problem type 1

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.9.005
Somayé Ghandi, Ellips Masehian
{"title":"Fitness landscape analysis of the simple assembly line balancing problem type 1","authors":"Somayé Ghandi, Ellips Masehian","doi":"10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.9.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the simple assembly line balancing problem type 1 (SALBP1) has been proven to be NP-hard, heuristic and metaheuristic approaches are widely used for solving middle to large instances. Nevertheless, the characteristics (fitness landscape) of the problem’s search space have not been studied so far and no rigorous justification for implementing various metaheuristic methods has been presented. Aiming to fill this gap in the literature, this study presents the first comprehensive and in-depth Fitness Landscape Analysis (FLA) study for SALBP1. The FLA was performed by generating a population of 1000 random solutions and improving them to local optimal solution, and then measuring various statistical indices such as average distance, gap, entropy, amplitude, length of the walk, autocorrelation, and fitness-distance among all solutions, to understand the complexity, structure, and topology of the solution space. We solved 83 benchmark problems with various cycle times taken from Scholl’s dataset which required 83000 local searches from initial to optimal solutions. The analysis showed that locally optimal assembly line balances in SALBP1 are distributed nearly uniformly in the landscape of the problem, and the small average difference between the amplitudes of the initial and optimal solutions implies that the landscape was almost plain. In addition, the large average gap between local and global solutions showed that global optimum solutions in SALBP1 are difficult to find, but the problem can be effectively solved using a single-solution-based metaheuristic to near-optimality. In addition to the FLA, a new mathematical formulation for the entropy (diversity) of solutions in the search space for SALBP1 is also presented in this paper.","PeriodicalId":51356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2023.9.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the simple assembly line balancing problem type 1 (SALBP1) has been proven to be NP-hard, heuristic and metaheuristic approaches are widely used for solving middle to large instances. Nevertheless, the characteristics (fitness landscape) of the problem’s search space have not been studied so far and no rigorous justification for implementing various metaheuristic methods has been presented. Aiming to fill this gap in the literature, this study presents the first comprehensive and in-depth Fitness Landscape Analysis (FLA) study for SALBP1. The FLA was performed by generating a population of 1000 random solutions and improving them to local optimal solution, and then measuring various statistical indices such as average distance, gap, entropy, amplitude, length of the walk, autocorrelation, and fitness-distance among all solutions, to understand the complexity, structure, and topology of the solution space. We solved 83 benchmark problems with various cycle times taken from Scholl’s dataset which required 83000 local searches from initial to optimal solutions. The analysis showed that locally optimal assembly line balances in SALBP1 are distributed nearly uniformly in the landscape of the problem, and the small average difference between the amplitudes of the initial and optimal solutions implies that the landscape was almost plain. In addition, the large average gap between local and global solutions showed that global optimum solutions in SALBP1 are difficult to find, but the problem can be effectively solved using a single-solution-based metaheuristic to near-optimality. In addition to the FLA, a new mathematical formulation for the entropy (diversity) of solutions in the search space for SALBP1 is also presented in this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简单装配线平衡问题类型的适应度景观分析
由于简单装配线平衡问题类型1 (SALBP1)已被证明是np困难的,因此启发式和元启发式方法被广泛用于求解大中型实例。然而,问题搜索空间的特征(适应度景观)到目前为止还没有研究过,也没有提出实施各种元启发式方法的严格理由。为了填补这一文献空白,本研究首次对SALBP1进行了全面深入的Fitness Landscape Analysis (FLA)研究。通过生成1000个随机解的总体,并将其改进为局部最优解,然后测量所有解之间的平均距离、间隙、熵、振幅、行走长度、自相关性和适应度距离等统计指标,了解解空间的复杂性、结构和拓扑结构。我们用来自Scholl数据集的不同周期时间解决了83个基准问题,从初始到最优解决方案需要83000个本地搜索。分析表明,SALBP1的局部最优装配线平衡几乎均匀地分布在问题的景观中,初始解和最优解振幅之间的平均差很小,表明景观几乎是平坦的。此外,SALBP1的局部解与全局解之间的平均差距较大,表明该问题很难找到全局最优解,但使用基于单解的元启发式算法可以有效地求解该问题。此外,本文还提出了SALBP1搜索空间中解的熵(多样性)的一个新的数学公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A unifying framework and a mathematical model for the Slab Stack Shuffling Problem Heuristics and metaheuristics to minimize makespan for flowshop with peak power consumption constraints Minimizing operating expenditures for a manufacturing system featuring quality reassurances, probabilistic failures, overtime, and outsourcing Composite heuristics and water wave optimality algorithms for tri-criteria multiple job classes and customer order scheduling on a single machine Investigating the collective impact of postponement, scrap, and external suppliers on multiproduct replenishing decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1