Managerial sentiment and corporate risk-taking: evidence from Chinese listed companies’ annual reports

IF 3.1 Q2 MANAGEMENT Management Research Review Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1108/mrr-02-2023-0110
Zhihao Qin, Menglin Cui, Jiaqi Yan, Jie Niu
{"title":"Managerial sentiment and corporate risk-taking: evidence from Chinese listed companies’ annual reports","authors":"Zhihao Qin, Menglin Cui, Jiaqi Yan, Jie Niu","doi":"10.1108/mrr-02-2023-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to examine whether managerial sentiment, extracted from annual reports, is associated with corporate risk-taking in the context of Chinese companies. This study expands the vein of literature on overconfidence theory. Design/methodology/approach By leveraging textual analysis on Chinese listed companies’ annual reports, the authors construct firm-level managerial sentiment during 2007 and 2021 to examine how managerial sentiment influences corporate risk-taking after control for firm characteristics. Corporate risk-taking is denoted by corporate investment engagements: capital expenditures and net fixed asset investment. Findings Results show that incentives for corporate risk-taking are likely to increase with the positive managerial sentiment and decrease with the negative sentiment in companies’ annual reports. Positive managerial sentiment is associated with over-/under-investment and low/high investment efficiency. Further additional tests show that the managerial sentiment effect only holds during low economic uncertain years and samples of private-owned firms. Furthermore, the robust tests indicate that there is no endogenous issue between managerial sentiment and corporate risk-taking. Research limitations/implications Annual report textual-based managerial sentiment may not perfectly reflect managers’ lower frequency sentiment (e.g. weekly, monthly and quarterly sentiment). Future studies could attempt to capture managers’ on-time sentiment by using media sources and corporate disclosures. Practical implications To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first research to provide insights into supervising managers’ corporate decisions by observing their textual information usage in corporate disclosure. Moreover, the approach of measuring managerial sentiment might be a solution to monitoring managerial class. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature on accounting and finance studies, adding another piece of empirical evidence on content analysis by examining a unique language and institutional context (i.e. China). Besides, the paper notes that in line with the English version disclosure, based on Chinese semantic words, managerial sentiment in the Chinese-speaking world has magnitude on corporate decisions. The research provides insights into supervising managers’ corporate decisions by observing their textual information usage in corporate disclosure. Moreover, the approach to measuring managerial sentiment may be a practical solution to monitoring managerial class.","PeriodicalId":47769,"journal":{"name":"Management Research Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-02-2023-0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine whether managerial sentiment, extracted from annual reports, is associated with corporate risk-taking in the context of Chinese companies. This study expands the vein of literature on overconfidence theory. Design/methodology/approach By leveraging textual analysis on Chinese listed companies’ annual reports, the authors construct firm-level managerial sentiment during 2007 and 2021 to examine how managerial sentiment influences corporate risk-taking after control for firm characteristics. Corporate risk-taking is denoted by corporate investment engagements: capital expenditures and net fixed asset investment. Findings Results show that incentives for corporate risk-taking are likely to increase with the positive managerial sentiment and decrease with the negative sentiment in companies’ annual reports. Positive managerial sentiment is associated with over-/under-investment and low/high investment efficiency. Further additional tests show that the managerial sentiment effect only holds during low economic uncertain years and samples of private-owned firms. Furthermore, the robust tests indicate that there is no endogenous issue between managerial sentiment and corporate risk-taking. Research limitations/implications Annual report textual-based managerial sentiment may not perfectly reflect managers’ lower frequency sentiment (e.g. weekly, monthly and quarterly sentiment). Future studies could attempt to capture managers’ on-time sentiment by using media sources and corporate disclosures. Practical implications To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first research to provide insights into supervising managers’ corporate decisions by observing their textual information usage in corporate disclosure. Moreover, the approach of measuring managerial sentiment might be a solution to monitoring managerial class. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature on accounting and finance studies, adding another piece of empirical evidence on content analysis by examining a unique language and institutional context (i.e. China). Besides, the paper notes that in line with the English version disclosure, based on Chinese semantic words, managerial sentiment in the Chinese-speaking world has magnitude on corporate decisions. The research provides insights into supervising managers’ corporate decisions by observing their textual information usage in corporate disclosure. Moreover, the approach to measuring managerial sentiment may be a practical solution to monitoring managerial class.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理层情绪与企业风险承担:来自中国上市公司年报的证据
本文旨在研究从年度报告中提取的管理层情绪是否与中国公司的风险承担有关。本研究拓展了过度自信理论的文献脉络。设计/方法/方法通过对中国上市公司年报的文本分析,作者构建了2007年和2021年的公司层面的管理情绪,以考察控制公司特征后管理情绪对公司风险承担的影响。公司的风险承担由公司的投资项目表示:资本支出和净固定资产投资。研究结果表明,企业风险承担的激励可能会随着企业年报中积极的管理情绪而增加,而随着消极的管理情绪而减少。积极的管理情绪与投资过多/不足和投资效率低/高有关。进一步的检验表明,管理层情绪效应仅在经济不确定年份和私营企业样本中成立。此外,稳健检验表明,管理层情绪与企业风险承担之间不存在内生问题。基于年度报告文本的管理情绪可能不能完全反映管理者较低频率的情绪(如每周、每月和季度情绪)。未来的研究可以尝试通过使用媒体来源和公司披露来捕捉管理者的准时情绪。据作者所知,本文是第一个通过观察管理者在公司披露中的文本信息使用情况来监督管理者公司决策的研究。此外,测量管理情绪的方法可能是监控管理阶层的一种解决方案。本文对会计和金融研究的文献做出了贡献,通过研究独特的语言和制度背景(即中国),为内容分析增加了另一块经验证据。此外,本文注意到,与英文版披露的结果一致,基于中文语义词,汉语世界的管理情绪对公司决策有显著影响。本研究通过观察管理者在公司信息披露中的文本信息使用情况,为监督管理者的公司决策提供了新的思路。此外,测量管理情绪的方法可能是监控管理阶层的实际解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Management Research Review publishes a wide variety of articles outlining the latest management research. We emphasize management implication from multiple disciplines. We welcome high quality empirical and theoretical studies, literature reviews, and articles with important tactical implications. Published 12 times a year, the journal prides itself on quick publication of the very latest research in general management. The key issues featured include: Business Ethics and Sustainability Corporate Finance Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management Industrial Relations Information and Knowledge Management International Business Human Resource Management Organizational Theory and Behaviour Production and Operations Management Strategic Management and Leadership
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the relationship between authentic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: the key roles of organizational support and identification Fostering employee autonomy through rewards: a self-determination theory perspective The cascading role of leader-induced defensive cognitions and citizenship pressures in navigating employee silence Bankruptcy as a planned business strategy? Evidence from the stock market Agility in virtual environments: the socio-technical approach of distributed agile teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1