“So, if you ask whether fences work: they work”—the role of border fortifications for migration control and access to asylum. Comparing Hungary and the USA

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1186/s40878-023-00352-1
Kristina Korte
{"title":"“So, if you ask whether fences work: they work”—the role of border fortifications for migration control and access to asylum. Comparing Hungary and the USA","authors":"Kristina Korte","doi":"10.1186/s40878-023-00352-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyzes the role of border fortifications for migration control and access to asylum based on two case studies: the Hungarian–Serbian and U.S. American–Mexican borders. The research is based on qualitative interviews on both sides of the borders. It shows that despite other options for border control, fortifications still play an important role, especially for asylum seekers. Fences fulfill a material, a symbolic and a filtering function here. The three functions contribute in different ways to preventing asylum seekers from crossing the border, thus depriving refugees of the opportunity to apply for asylum. The paper shoes that fences fulfill functions that other forms of border control (such as shifting or smart borders) cannot accomplish in the same way and it thereby contributes to understanding the ‘puzzle’ of contemporary border fencing.","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00352-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the role of border fortifications for migration control and access to asylum based on two case studies: the Hungarian–Serbian and U.S. American–Mexican borders. The research is based on qualitative interviews on both sides of the borders. It shows that despite other options for border control, fortifications still play an important role, especially for asylum seekers. Fences fulfill a material, a symbolic and a filtering function here. The three functions contribute in different ways to preventing asylum seekers from crossing the border, thus depriving refugees of the opportunity to apply for asylum. The paper shoes that fences fulfill functions that other forms of border control (such as shifting or smart borders) cannot accomplish in the same way and it thereby contributes to understanding the ‘puzzle’ of contemporary border fencing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“所以,如果你问围栏是否有效:它们有效”——边境防御工事的作用是控制移民和获得庇护。比较匈牙利和美国
本文以匈牙利-塞尔维亚边境和美国-墨西哥边境为例,分析了边境防御工事在移民控制和获得庇护方面的作用。这项研究是基于对两国的定性访谈。这表明,尽管有其他边境控制选择,但防御工事仍然发挥着重要作用,尤其是对寻求庇护者而言。栅栏在这里起到了材料、象征和过滤的作用。这三种职能以不同的方式有助于防止寻求庇护者越过边界,从而剥夺难民申请庇护的机会。栅栏的纸鞋实现了其他形式的边境控制(如移动或智能边界)无法以同样的方式完成的功能,因此有助于理解当代边境围栏的“谜题”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Standardised integration requirements for naturalisation: less rights and less discretion? A qualitative meta-analysis of ethnographic studies of naturalisation procedures in Europe Who are the immigrants that Israeli Jews prefer? The interplay between reasons for migration, religion, and religiosity Saving behavior among immigrant and native youth De-migranticizing as methodology: rethinking migration studies through immobility and liminality Ambiguous citizenship policies: Examining implementation gaps across levels of legislation in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1