CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF TAX OPTIMIZATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

M. A. Perepelitsa
{"title":"CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF TAX OPTIMIZATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE","authors":"M. A. Perepelitsa","doi":"10.24888/2949-3293-2023-2-2-45-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the question for distinguishing the payer’s subjective right to tax op-timization and the abuse of such a right. The lack of clarity and legal certainty in this matter leads to a violation of the fiscal interests of the state, as a result of which budgets incur financial losses or the legitimate rights of taxpayers are violated. An attempt to resolve this problem within the framework of judicial law–making, of course, brought a positive result, however, as practice has shown, this was not enough. The purpose of the article is to define the boundaries between the concepts of “the payer’s right to tax optimization” and “abuse of tax law” with the justification of fixing these provisions in the Tax Code of the Russian Fed-eration. Special attention is paid to the reasons that contribute to increasing the possibilities of the payer to abuse his tax right to optimization. As a result of the study, it is noted that the payer’s right to tax optimization should be understood as a reduction in the amount of tax liabilities through lawful actions of a person, including the use of the rights granted by law related to exemption from taxes, fees (mandato-ry payments), their reduction or reimbursement. And the abuse of tax law is a form of the tax-payer’s realization of his subjective tax right when it contradicts its true purpose, formally es-tablished in the law, is harmful and entails unjustified economic advantages over others. The exercise of the right to tax optimization is always the lawful behavior of the payer. The main limits beyond which the payer’s right to optimize taxation passes into its abuse are harmful-ness and obtaining tax advantages over other payers. Harmfulness is not illegal or unlawful behavior of a person, but indicates that he uses his right to tax optimization in order to achieve another result that was not originally provided by the legislator when establishing the meaning and content of this right. Therefore, abuse of tax law does not entail any legal liability for the payer, since he does not violate the norms of tax legislation and does not go beyond the limits specified by law, beyond which a tax offense already begins (a criminal offense under Articles 198, 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The consequences in this situation consist only in the rightful actions of the ruling entity (court or tax authority).","PeriodicalId":491082,"journal":{"name":"Questions of State and Law","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Questions of State and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24888/2949-3293-2023-2-2-45-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article raises the question for distinguishing the payer’s subjective right to tax op-timization and the abuse of such a right. The lack of clarity and legal certainty in this matter leads to a violation of the fiscal interests of the state, as a result of which budgets incur financial losses or the legitimate rights of taxpayers are violated. An attempt to resolve this problem within the framework of judicial law–making, of course, brought a positive result, however, as practice has shown, this was not enough. The purpose of the article is to define the boundaries between the concepts of “the payer’s right to tax optimization” and “abuse of tax law” with the justification of fixing these provisions in the Tax Code of the Russian Fed-eration. Special attention is paid to the reasons that contribute to increasing the possibilities of the payer to abuse his tax right to optimization. As a result of the study, it is noted that the payer’s right to tax optimization should be understood as a reduction in the amount of tax liabilities through lawful actions of a person, including the use of the rights granted by law related to exemption from taxes, fees (mandato-ry payments), their reduction or reimbursement. And the abuse of tax law is a form of the tax-payer’s realization of his subjective tax right when it contradicts its true purpose, formally es-tablished in the law, is harmful and entails unjustified economic advantages over others. The exercise of the right to tax optimization is always the lawful behavior of the payer. The main limits beyond which the payer’s right to optimize taxation passes into its abuse are harmful-ness and obtaining tax advantages over other payers. Harmfulness is not illegal or unlawful behavior of a person, but indicates that he uses his right to tax optimization in order to achieve another result that was not originally provided by the legislator when establishing the meaning and content of this right. Therefore, abuse of tax law does not entail any legal liability for the payer, since he does not violate the norms of tax legislation and does not go beyond the limits specified by law, beyond which a tax offense already begins (a criminal offense under Articles 198, 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The consequences in this situation consist only in the rightful actions of the ruling entity (court or tax authority).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税收优化在理论和实践中的争议问题
本文提出了区分纳税主体的税收优化权与税收优化权滥用的问题。由于在这一问题上缺乏明确性和法律确定性,导致国家财政利益受到侵犯,从而导致预算遭受财政损失或纳税人的合法权利受到侵犯。在司法立法框架内解决这一问题的尝试当然取得了积极的成果,但实践表明,这还不够。本文的目的是界定“纳税人的税收优化权”和“滥用税法”的概念之间的界限,并在俄罗斯联邦税法中确定这些规定的理由。特别关注导致纳税人滥用其税收权利的可能性增加的原因。研究结果指出,应将付款人的税收优化权理解为通过一个人的合法行动减少纳税义务的数额,包括使用法律赋予的与免税、费用(强制性支付)、减少或偿还有关的权利。而税法滥用则是纳税人在违背其在法律上正式确立的真正目的时实现其主观征税权的一种表现形式,具有危害性,并会带来不正当的经济利益。税收优化权的行使始终是纳税义务人的合法行为。纳税人优化税收的权利被滥用的主要限制是有害的和获得比其他纳税人的税收优惠。危害性并不是指一个人的违法行为,而是指他利用自己的税收优化权利,以达到立法者在确立该权利的含义和内容时原本没有提供的另一种结果。因此,滥用税法不需要纳税人承担任何法律责任,因为他没有违反税收立法的规范,也没有超出法律规定的限制,超过这些限制就已经开始了税收犯罪(根据俄罗斯联邦刑法第198、199条的刑事犯罪)。这种情况下的后果只在于统治实体(法院或税务机关)的合法行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE CHILD’S RIGHT TO SECURE INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNET AND TO PROTECTION FROM THE DESTRUCTIVE IMPACT OF THE INTERNET ENVIRONMENT: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF TAX OPTIMIZATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE THE CONCEPT AND FUNCTIONS OF A TRADEMARK IN CIVIL CIRCULATION. TYPES OF TRADEMARKS BUDGET LOAN FOR REPLENISHMENT OF FUNDS BALANCES ON A SINGLE BUDGET ACCOUNT K.D. USHINSKY ON STATE POWER (on the 200th anniversary of birth)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1