Propaganda, Social Media, and Political Participation: Quantitative Analysis of The Influence of Propaganda #2019gantipresiden on Outcomes and Levels of Political Participation of National Voters in The 2019 Presidential Elections

Iding Rosyidin, Bambang Ruswandi
{"title":"Propaganda, Social Media, and Political Participation: Quantitative Analysis of The Influence of Propaganda #2019gantipresiden on Outcomes and Levels of Political Participation of National Voters in The 2019 Presidential Elections","authors":"Iding Rosyidin, Bambang Ruswandi","doi":"10.15294/ipsr.v8i1.43481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In politics, propaganda is often used, for example, during general elections. Among the propaganda media that can be used is social media such as Twitter. During the 2019 Indonesian presidential election, one of the supporters of the presidential candidate pair carried out propaganda, namely the #2019gantipresiden tweet. From a propaganda perspective, this hashtag can be categorized as the bandwagon type of propaganda (Shabo, 2008), a technique that asks audiences to follow propagandist ideas. This study aims to determine the influence of #2019gantipresiden tweets on the results and participation rates in the 2019 Presidential Election. The data used in this study are tweets with the hashtag #2019gantipresiden spread across 34 provinces in Indonesia. Data was collected over three months, namely May, June, and July 2018, when this hashtag was first launched. In addition, data from the results of the 2019 Presidential Election were obtained from the KPU. The data analysis results show a significant relationship between the number of #2019gantipresiden tweets and the Jokowi-Ma'ruf vote. However, this relationship becomes insignificant when including Prabowo-Sandi's vote acquisition as a control variable and has the opportunity to reduce the vote gain obtained by the Jokowi-Ma'ruf pair. This result is inversely proportional to the relationship between the number of #2019gantipresiden tweets and Prabowo-Sandi's vote gain, where the relationship between the two remains significant whether controlled by Jokowo-Ma'ruf vote gain or not. The appearance of the #2019gantipresiden tweet also triggered public participation in the 2019 presidential election by giving it an influence of 31.4%.","PeriodicalId":53373,"journal":{"name":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v8i1.43481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In politics, propaganda is often used, for example, during general elections. Among the propaganda media that can be used is social media such as Twitter. During the 2019 Indonesian presidential election, one of the supporters of the presidential candidate pair carried out propaganda, namely the #2019gantipresiden tweet. From a propaganda perspective, this hashtag can be categorized as the bandwagon type of propaganda (Shabo, 2008), a technique that asks audiences to follow propagandist ideas. This study aims to determine the influence of #2019gantipresiden tweets on the results and participation rates in the 2019 Presidential Election. The data used in this study are tweets with the hashtag #2019gantipresiden spread across 34 provinces in Indonesia. Data was collected over three months, namely May, June, and July 2018, when this hashtag was first launched. In addition, data from the results of the 2019 Presidential Election were obtained from the KPU. The data analysis results show a significant relationship between the number of #2019gantipresiden tweets and the Jokowi-Ma'ruf vote. However, this relationship becomes insignificant when including Prabowo-Sandi's vote acquisition as a control variable and has the opportunity to reduce the vote gain obtained by the Jokowi-Ma'ruf pair. This result is inversely proportional to the relationship between the number of #2019gantipresiden tweets and Prabowo-Sandi's vote gain, where the relationship between the two remains significant whether controlled by Jokowo-Ma'ruf vote gain or not. The appearance of the #2019gantipresiden tweet also triggered public participation in the 2019 presidential election by giving it an influence of 31.4%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宣传,社交媒体和政治参与:宣传#2019gantipresiden对2019年总统选举中全国选民政治参与的结果和水平的影响的定量分析
在政治上,宣传经常被使用,例如在大选期间。可以使用的宣传媒体是Twitter等社交媒体。在2019年印尼总统大选期间,总统候选人对的支持者之一进行了宣传,即#2019gantipresiden推文。从宣传的角度来看,这种标签可以归类为从众宣传类型(Shabo, 2008),一种要求受众跟随宣传思想的技术。本研究旨在确定#2019gantipresiden推文对2019年总统选举结果和参与率的影响。这项研究中使用的数据是印度尼西亚34个省份的推文,标签为#2019gantipresiden。数据是在2018年5月、6月和7月这三个月里收集的,当时这个标签首次发布。此外,2019年总统选举结果的数据是从KPU获得的。数据分析结果显示,#2019gantipresiden推文的数量与佐科维-马鲁夫的投票之间存在显著关系。然而,当将Prabowo-Sandi获得的选票作为控制变量,并有机会减少Jokowi-Ma'ruf对获得的选票收益时,这种关系就变得不显著了。这一结果与#2019gantipresiden推文的数量与Prabowo-Sandi的选票增益之间的关系成反比,两者之间的关系仍然很重要,无论是否受佐科沃-马鲁夫的选票增益控制。#2019gantipresiden推文的出现也引发了2019年总统选举的公众参与,其影响力达到31.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Regional Regulations on Handling Homelessness and Beggars in Palu City OPEN GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION DURING THE PANDEMIC: LESSON – LEARNED FROM SURAKARTA CITY GOVERNMENT The Character of Electronic-Based Government System in Medium-Term Cities or Regencies Development Planning in the Province of Central Java in 2021-2026 ACTORS' APPROACH IN THE DISCOURSE OF REJECTING THE THRESHOLD FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDACY IN GENERAL ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA Kepemimpinan Publik: Perspektif Kepala Desa di Kabupaten Kebumen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1