Chinese technology and the transformation of the rural economy in Ghana: Evidence from galamsey in the ashanti and Savannah regions

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES African Affairs Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1093/afraf/adad023
Emmanuel Akyeampong, Liang Xu
{"title":"Chinese technology and the transformation of the rural economy in Ghana: Evidence from <i>galamsey</i> in the ashanti and Savannah regions","authors":"Emmanuel Akyeampong, Liang Xu","doi":"10.1093/afraf/adad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The recent Chinese involvement in small-scale gold mining in Ghana has received wide publicity and scholarly attention. While the literature has focused on environmental sustainability, political accountability, and institutional reforms, it is yet to examine local adoption of Chinese technology and its impact on Ghana’s rural economy. We argue that it is in the interstices between the formal economy and entrepreneurship within the informal economy that opportunities for Chinese interventions emerge. Using evidence from Manso Akropong in the Ashanti region and Bole in the Savannah region, this article shows that, while Chinese technology’s impact is transformative, the outcomes are divergent in different regions. In Manso Akropong, the intensification of mining backed by Ghanaian–Chinese collaborations has led to the environmental destruction, creating competition between gold mining and cocoa farming that had underpinned Ghana’s rural prosperity. In Bole, where less aggressive Chinese technology such as Changfa and rubber mats are incorporated without direct Chinese participation, a more sustainable pattern of growth has emerged. This comparative study suggests that besides the large-scale projects and state-led training programmes, grassroots actors like informal artisanal miners are at the forefront of technology transfer in the China–Africa encounter.","PeriodicalId":7508,"journal":{"name":"African Affairs","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adad023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The recent Chinese involvement in small-scale gold mining in Ghana has received wide publicity and scholarly attention. While the literature has focused on environmental sustainability, political accountability, and institutional reforms, it is yet to examine local adoption of Chinese technology and its impact on Ghana’s rural economy. We argue that it is in the interstices between the formal economy and entrepreneurship within the informal economy that opportunities for Chinese interventions emerge. Using evidence from Manso Akropong in the Ashanti region and Bole in the Savannah region, this article shows that, while Chinese technology’s impact is transformative, the outcomes are divergent in different regions. In Manso Akropong, the intensification of mining backed by Ghanaian–Chinese collaborations has led to the environmental destruction, creating competition between gold mining and cocoa farming that had underpinned Ghana’s rural prosperity. In Bole, where less aggressive Chinese technology such as Changfa and rubber mats are incorporated without direct Chinese participation, a more sustainable pattern of growth has emerged. This comparative study suggests that besides the large-scale projects and state-led training programmes, grassroots actors like informal artisanal miners are at the forefront of technology transfer in the China–Africa encounter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国技术与加纳农村经济转型:来自阿散蒂和萨凡纳地区galamsey的证据
最近,中国在加纳参与小规模金矿开采受到了广泛的宣传和学术界的关注。虽然文献集中在环境可持续性、政治问责制和制度改革方面,但尚未研究中国技术在当地的采用及其对加纳农村经济的影响。我们认为,正是在正规经济和非正规经济中的企业家精神之间的间隙,中国干预的机会才会出现。本文利用来自阿散蒂地区的Manso Akropong和萨凡纳地区的Bole的证据表明,虽然中国技术的影响是变革性的,但不同地区的结果是不同的。在曼索阿克罗蓬,加纳与中国合作支持的采矿活动加剧,导致了环境破坏,在金矿开采和可可种植之间形成了竞争,而后者曾是加纳农村繁荣的基础。在伯乐,一种更可持续的增长模式已经出现。在伯乐,在没有中国直接参与的情况下,长发和橡胶垫等不那么激进的中国技术被纳入其中。这一对比研究表明,除了大型项目和国家主导的培训计划外,像非正规手工矿工这样的基层行动者在中非接触中处于技术转移的前沿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Affairs
African Affairs Multiple-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: African Affairs is published on behalf of the Royal African Society. It publishes articles on recent political, social and economic developments in sub-Saharan countries. Also included are historical studies that illuminate current events in the continent. Each issue of African Affairs contains a substantial section of book reviews, with occasional review articles. There is also an invaluable list of recently published books, and a listing of articles on Africa that have appeared in non-Africanist journals.
期刊最新文献
The urbanization of conflict? Patterns of armed conflict and protest in Africa Itinerary of a Christian Ex-Boko Haram bomb maker in Cameroon The production of climate security futures in the West African Sahel Policing and Citizen Trust in Kenya: How Community Policing Shapes Local Trust-Building and Collaboration Stigmatized Professions and Ambiguous Subjects: Methodological Reflections from Sanitation Workers and Opioid Consumption in Sierra Leone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1