Impact of Methylprednisolone Pulse on the Mortality of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to COVID-19

IF 0.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001296
Adrián Sousa, Olalla Lima, Alexandre Pérez-González, Alejandro Araujo, Rebeca Longueira, Antón Otero, Marta Núñez, Cristina Ramos, Lucía Martínez-Lamas, Manuel Crespo-Casal, Martin Rubianes, María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez
{"title":"Impact of Methylprednisolone Pulse on the Mortality of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to COVID-19","authors":"Adrián Sousa, Olalla Lima, Alexandre Pérez-González, Alejandro Araujo, Rebeca Longueira, Antón Otero, Marta Núñez, Cristina Ramos, Lucía Martínez-Lamas, Manuel Crespo-Casal, Martin Rubianes, María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Corticosteroids have been thoroughly used in the treatment of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of methylprednisolone pulse on in-hospital mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study. We selected adult patients admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of COVID-19 between March and June 2020. Cox regression was used to identify the factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 306 patients were analyzed. In-hospital crude mortality rate was 17%. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–4.55), dementia (HR, 7.7; 95% CI, 4.25–13.87) and ARDS (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.34–7.46) were associated with in-hospital mortality. In patients with ARDS diagnosis, the only in-hospital mortality risk factor was dementia (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.44–11.07), whereas methylprednisolone pulse was a protective factor (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.09–0.63). In the follow-up, 40% of patients had some symptom related to COVID-19. Conclusions Methylprednisolone pulse reduced the in-hospital mortality in patients with ARDS due to COVID-19. A high percentage of patients presented persistent symptoms in 90 days after the hospital discharge.","PeriodicalId":13952,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Corticosteroids have been thoroughly used in the treatment of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of methylprednisolone pulse on in-hospital mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study. We selected adult patients admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of COVID-19 between March and June 2020. Cox regression was used to identify the factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 306 patients were analyzed. In-hospital crude mortality rate was 17%. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–4.55), dementia (HR, 7.7; 95% CI, 4.25–13.87) and ARDS (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.34–7.46) were associated with in-hospital mortality. In patients with ARDS diagnosis, the only in-hospital mortality risk factor was dementia (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.44–11.07), whereas methylprednisolone pulse was a protective factor (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.09–0.63). In the follow-up, 40% of patients had some symptom related to COVID-19. Conclusions Methylprednisolone pulse reduced the in-hospital mortality in patients with ARDS due to COVID-19. A high percentage of patients presented persistent symptoms in 90 days after the hospital discharge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗对COVID-19继发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率的影响
糖皮质激素已被广泛应用于COVID-19的治疗。本研究的目的是分析甲基强的松龙脉冲对COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者住院死亡率的影响。方法采用回顾性、单中心观察性研究。我们选择了2020年3月至6月期间入院诊断为COVID-19的成年患者。采用Cox回归分析确定与住院死亡率相关的因素。结果共分析306例患者。院内粗死亡率为17%。糖尿病(危险比[HR], 5.5;95%可信区间[CI], 1.40-4.55),痴呆(相对危险度,7.7;95% CI, 4.25-13.87)和ARDS (HR, 4.2;95% CI, 2.34-7.46)与住院死亡率相关。在诊断为ARDS的患者中,唯一的院内死亡危险因素是痴呆(HR, 5.2;95% CI, 2.44-11.07),而甲基强的松龙脉冲是保护因素(HR, 0.2;95% ci, 0.09-0.63)。在随访中,40%的患者出现了与COVID-19相关的症状。结论甲强的松龙脉冲治疗可降低COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的住院死亡率。患者出院后90天出现持续症状的比例很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Medical professionals seeking an infectious diseases journal with true clinical value need look no further than Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. Here, clinicians can get full coverage consolidated into one resource, with pertinent new developments presented in a way that makes them easy to apply to patient care. From HIV care delivery to Hepatitis C virus testing…travel and tropical medicine…and infection surveillance, prevention, and control, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice delivers the vital information needed to optimally prevent and treat infectious diseases. Indexed/abstracted in: EMBASE, SCOPUS, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine
期刊最新文献
The Etiologic Organisms, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients Evaluation of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Women With Acute Cystitis Visiting Outpatient Clinic in South Korea Mucormycosis in Diabetes Determinants of Mortality in COVID-19–Associated Opportunistic Fungal Infections Ceftaroline Fosamil as a Potential Treatment for Central Nervous System Infections in Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1