Mentor teachers’ professional vision: A study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Curriculum Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517
Aron Decuyper, Hanne Tack, Karolien Keppens, Kristof Van Damme, Peter Lambert, Ruben Vanderlinde
{"title":"Mentor teachers’ professional vision: A study of the differences with classroom teachers and student teachers","authors":"Aron Decuyper, Hanne Tack, Karolien Keppens, Kristof Van Damme, Peter Lambert, Ruben Vanderlinde","doi":"10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA crucial competence for mentor teachers is the ability to analyse classroom practices as they are expected to model effective teaching practices and to provide feedback to student teachers. This ability is referred to in the literature as professional vision. The present study assesses mentor teachers’ (n = 137) professional vision regarding teacher-student interactions and differentiated instruction, using a validated video-based comparative judgement measurement instrument. The results indicate that mentor teachers have a high professional vision. It can thus be assumed that mentor teachers can support student teachers. Additionally, their professional vision is compared with that of classroom teachers (n = 996) and student teachers (n = 2168), expecting it to be significantly higher than that of classroom teachers and student teachers. The results show no significant difference between mentor teachers and classroom teachers but a significant difference between mentor teachers and student teachers. Hence, mentor teachers and classroom teachers are equally able to identify and interpret crucial aspects of effective teaching behaviour and both groups are better able than student teachers in this regard. This study contributes to the current state of the art on mentor teachers from a theoretical, empirical and methodological point of view.KEYWORDS: Mentor teachersprofessional visioncomparative judgementteacher-student interactionsdifferentiated instruction AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank our three reviewers for the time and effort spent on review our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all their valuable comments and suggestions which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2258517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTA crucial competence for mentor teachers is the ability to analyse classroom practices as they are expected to model effective teaching practices and to provide feedback to student teachers. This ability is referred to in the literature as professional vision. The present study assesses mentor teachers’ (n = 137) professional vision regarding teacher-student interactions and differentiated instruction, using a validated video-based comparative judgement measurement instrument. The results indicate that mentor teachers have a high professional vision. It can thus be assumed that mentor teachers can support student teachers. Additionally, their professional vision is compared with that of classroom teachers (n = 996) and student teachers (n = 2168), expecting it to be significantly higher than that of classroom teachers and student teachers. The results show no significant difference between mentor teachers and classroom teachers but a significant difference between mentor teachers and student teachers. Hence, mentor teachers and classroom teachers are equally able to identify and interpret crucial aspects of effective teaching behaviour and both groups are better able than student teachers in this regard. This study contributes to the current state of the art on mentor teachers from a theoretical, empirical and methodological point of view.KEYWORDS: Mentor teachersprofessional visioncomparative judgementteacher-student interactionsdifferentiated instruction AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank our three reviewers for the time and effort spent on review our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all their valuable comments and suggestions which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导师的专业视野:课堂教师与学生教师的差异研究
导师制教师的关键能力是分析课堂实践的能力,因为他们被期望为有效的教学实践建模并向实习教师提供反馈。这种能力在文献中被称为专业视野。本研究采用一种经过验证的基于视频的比较判断测量工具,评估指导教师(n = 137)在师生互动和差异化教学方面的专业愿景。研究结果显示,导师具有较高的专业视野。因此,可以假设导师教师可以支持学生教师。并与任课教师(n = 996)和实习教师(n = 2168)的专业愿景进行比较,预期其专业愿景显著高于任课教师和实习教师。结果显示,导师教师与课堂教师之间无显著差异,而导师教师与学生教师之间存在显著差异。因此,导师教师和课堂教师同样能够识别和解释有效教学行为的关键方面,这两个群体在这方面都比学生教师更有能力。本研究从理论、实证和方法论的角度对导师教师的研究现状做出了贡献。关键词:导师、专业视野、比较判断、师生互动、差异化教学感谢我们的三位审稿人花时间和精力审核我们的稿件。我们衷心感谢他们对我们提高稿件质量所提出的宝贵意见和建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Journal of Curriculum Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Curriculum Studies publishes conceptually rich contributions to all areas of curriculum studies, including those derived from empirical, philosophical, sociological, or policy-related investigations. The journal welcomes innovative papers that analyse the ways in which the social and institutional conditions of education and schooling contribute to shaping curriculum, including political, social and cultural studies; education policy; school reform and leadership; teaching; teacher education; curriculum development; and assessment and accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies does not subscribe to any particular methodology or theory. As the prime international source for curriculum research, the journal publishes papers accessible to all the national, cultural, and discipline-defined communities that form the readership.
期刊最新文献
Materialities of progressive curriculum reform: a case study of one kindergarten classroom Situating potentially and kinetically powerful knowledges: the power of meaning-making and social change The palimpsests of knowledge Principals’ conceptions of mathematics instruction: Co-constructing sophisticated instructional vision through professional development Alignment thinking and complementary curriculum: a qualitative study addressing the urgent need for environmental education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1