Review on the Estimation of Static Deformability Modulus of Rocks and their adoptability in Different Rock Masses

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.4038/engineer.v56i3.7608
M. N. C.  Samarawickrama, U. G. A. Puswewala, H. S. Thilakasiri, K. M. L. A. Udamulla
{"title":"Review on the Estimation of Static Deformability Modulus of Rocks and their adoptability in Different Rock Masses","authors":"M. N. C.  Samarawickrama, U. G. A. Puswewala, H. S. Thilakasiri, K. M. L. A. Udamulla","doi":"10.4038/engineer.v56i3.7608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to review the different mechanisms employed in the estimation of static rock mass deformability modulus (𝐸𝑚) in rock engineering applications and to investigate the adoptability of the identified mechanisms in different rock masses. The paper discusses different evaluation criteria through experimental, empirical and other means, with their merits and demerits, including influential factors. It is known that deformability modulus of intact rock depends on the imposed stress, strain rate and the confining stress on the rock sample as well as the rock texture and structure. The results generated for 𝐸𝑚 by different in-situ tests are different and an appropriate in-situ test based on the rock mass conditions should be employed to obtain reasonable results. Empirical criteria are found to produce results of reasonable precision if appropriately adopted for specific rock mass conditions, while the back analysis method is widely adopted as an insitu estimation measure for the design of rock-sockets and tunnel support. It has also been reported that substantial reduction in 𝐸𝑚 occurs due to schistosity and larger test volumes, while it is sensitive to stress and discontinuity conditions. In this work, specific recommendations are made on the estimation of 𝐸𝑚 for different types of rock masses based on the findings and reviews reported in the literature.","PeriodicalId":42812,"journal":{"name":"Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v56i3.7608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the different mechanisms employed in the estimation of static rock mass deformability modulus (𝐸𝑚) in rock engineering applications and to investigate the adoptability of the identified mechanisms in different rock masses. The paper discusses different evaluation criteria through experimental, empirical and other means, with their merits and demerits, including influential factors. It is known that deformability modulus of intact rock depends on the imposed stress, strain rate and the confining stress on the rock sample as well as the rock texture and structure. The results generated for 𝐸𝑚 by different in-situ tests are different and an appropriate in-situ test based on the rock mass conditions should be employed to obtain reasonable results. Empirical criteria are found to produce results of reasonable precision if appropriately adopted for specific rock mass conditions, while the back analysis method is widely adopted as an insitu estimation measure for the design of rock-sockets and tunnel support. It has also been reported that substantial reduction in 𝐸𝑚 occurs due to schistosity and larger test volumes, while it is sensitive to stress and discontinuity conditions. In this work, specific recommendations are made on the estimation of 𝐸𝑚 for different types of rock masses based on the findings and reviews reported in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岩石静态变形模量估算及其在不同岩体中的适用性研究进展
本研究的目的是回顾在岩石工程应用中估计静态岩体变形模量(𝑚)所采用的不同机制,并探讨所确定的机制在不同岩体中的适用性。本文通过实验、实证等方法对不同的评价标准进行了探讨,分析了其优缺点及影响因素。已知完整岩石的变形模量取决于施加在岩石试样上的应力、应变速率和围应力以及岩石的纹理和结构。不同的原位试验得出的𝑚的结果是不同的,应根据岩体条件进行适当的原位试验,以获得合理的结果。经验准则在特定的岩体条件下,如果采用适当的方法,可以得到合理精度的结果,而反分析方法作为一种原位估计方法,被广泛应用于岩穴和巷道支护的设计中。也有报道称,由于片理性和更大的测试体积,𝑚会出现大幅降低,同时对应力和不连续条件很敏感。本文在文献综述的基础上,对不同类型岩体的𝑚值的估计提出了具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
From the Editor… Review on the Estimation of Static Deformability Modulus of Rocks and their adoptability in Different Rock Masses Estimation Criteria for Static Rock Mass Deformability Modulus for Rock-Socket Design in Metamorphic Rock Masses Exploring Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using ArcGIS Techniques Integrated with Analytical Hierarchy Process under Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Kanakarayan Aru River Basin, Sri Lanka Lightning Protection of Stupas in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1