Comparison of RANSE and LES for Wind Structural Interaction

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.4038/engineer.v56i3.7610
L. H. S. U. Balasooriya, B. R. G. A. Krishantha, K. K. Wijesundara
{"title":"Comparison of RANSE and LES for Wind Structural Interaction","authors":"L. H. S. U. Balasooriya, B. R. G. A. Krishantha, K. K. Wijesundara","doi":"10.4038/engineer.v56i3.7610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popularity of tall buildings increases due to technological advances, but Code-based designs are conservative and not reliable for structures beyond 200 m height. Conducting a wind tunnel test is expensive and the resources are limited. Hence, numerical modelling is an alternative where Reynolds Average Navier Stokes Equation (RANSE) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) are such numerical techniques.In recent Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) studies, it could be observed that results have considerable deviations in flow separating and high turbulent areas. Hence a structured mesh was used here to perform mesh refinement in such critical locations to refine only the required areas.The objective of this study is to compare the RANSE and LES in interpreting the wind structural interactions using a structured mesh arrangement. This study will be limited to tall buildings of height less than 200m, rectangular in shape. Hence Commonwealth Advisory Aeronautical Council (CAARC) standard building model was used as the subject and Simulation results will then be compared with the values of the wind tunnel test available in the literature.It could be observed that the results obtained by RANSE simulation for a structured mesh has a deviation less than 10%. But natural variations of the wind are more clearly indicated with LES with a deviation even less than 3% in turbulent regions.","PeriodicalId":42812,"journal":{"name":"Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineer-Journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v56i3.7610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Popularity of tall buildings increases due to technological advances, but Code-based designs are conservative and not reliable for structures beyond 200 m height. Conducting a wind tunnel test is expensive and the resources are limited. Hence, numerical modelling is an alternative where Reynolds Average Navier Stokes Equation (RANSE) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) are such numerical techniques.In recent Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) studies, it could be observed that results have considerable deviations in flow separating and high turbulent areas. Hence a structured mesh was used here to perform mesh refinement in such critical locations to refine only the required areas.The objective of this study is to compare the RANSE and LES in interpreting the wind structural interactions using a structured mesh arrangement. This study will be limited to tall buildings of height less than 200m, rectangular in shape. Hence Commonwealth Advisory Aeronautical Council (CAARC) standard building model was used as the subject and Simulation results will then be compared with the values of the wind tunnel test available in the literature.It could be observed that the results obtained by RANSE simulation for a structured mesh has a deviation less than 10%. But natural variations of the wind are more clearly indicated with LES with a deviation even less than 3% in turbulent regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风结构相互作用的RANSE和LES比较
由于技术的进步,高层建筑越来越受欢迎,但基于规范的设计对于高度超过200米的结构来说是保守的,而且不可靠。进行风洞试验是昂贵的,而且资源有限。因此,数值模拟是另一种选择,其中雷诺平均纳维斯托克斯方程(RANSE)和大涡模拟(LES)是这样的数值技术。在最近的计算流体力学(Computational Fluid dynamics, CFD)研究中,可以观察到在流动分离和高湍流区,结果有相当大的偏差。因此,这里使用结构化网格在这些关键位置执行网格细化,以细化所需的区域。本研究的目的是比较RANSE和LES在使用结构化网格安排解释风结构相互作用方面的差异。本研究将限于高度不超过200米的矩形高层建筑。因此,英联邦咨询航空理事会(CAARC)标准建筑模型被用作主题,然后将模拟结果与文献中可用的风洞试验值进行比较。可以观察到,对于结构网格,RANSE模拟得到的结果偏差小于10%。而风的自然变化更明显地体现在LES上,在湍流区,其偏差甚至小于3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
From the Editor… Review on the Estimation of Static Deformability Modulus of Rocks and their adoptability in Different Rock Masses Estimation Criteria for Static Rock Mass Deformability Modulus for Rock-Socket Design in Metamorphic Rock Masses Exploring Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using ArcGIS Techniques Integrated with Analytical Hierarchy Process under Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Kanakarayan Aru River Basin, Sri Lanka Lightning Protection of Stupas in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1