St Adalbert as a stranger-king: The heroization and estrangement of a holy man in the Middle Ages

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY History and Anthropology Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1080/02757206.2023.2275786
Wojtek Jezierski
{"title":"St Adalbert as a stranger-king: The heroization and estrangement of a holy man in the Middle Ages","authors":"Wojtek Jezierski","doi":"10.1080/02757206.2023.2275786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There was no holy king in Poland during the Middle Ages. Although the Piast polity belonged to the North-eastern European periphery (East-Central Europe and Scandinavia), where essentially all post-1000 CE polities boasted dynastic martyred holy rulers of native origin, the Piasts never elevated a member of their kin to such a position. The present article takes this puzzling exception as a point of departure to advance the argument that the episcopal holy patron of Poland of Bohemian origin – St Adalbert (c. 956–997) – may in many regards be interpreted as a version of Marshall Sahlins’s stranger-king. By combining anthropological theory and comparative evidence, the article explores the locally produced hagiographical sources from the twelfth to the fifteenth centuries in order to demonstrate how St Adalbert’s heroic status and retroactively invented ethnic and sacral otherness were exploited for the purposes of institutional and king-like legitimacy vis-à-vis the Polish people. In its conclusions the article argues that concepts and comparative methods from political anthropology can help us to reconsider the category of holy rulers and offer new ways of reading hagiographical sources as political treatises.","PeriodicalId":46201,"journal":{"name":"History and Anthropology","volume":"27 21","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2023.2275786","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There was no holy king in Poland during the Middle Ages. Although the Piast polity belonged to the North-eastern European periphery (East-Central Europe and Scandinavia), where essentially all post-1000 CE polities boasted dynastic martyred holy rulers of native origin, the Piasts never elevated a member of their kin to such a position. The present article takes this puzzling exception as a point of departure to advance the argument that the episcopal holy patron of Poland of Bohemian origin – St Adalbert (c. 956–997) – may in many regards be interpreted as a version of Marshall Sahlins’s stranger-king. By combining anthropological theory and comparative evidence, the article explores the locally produced hagiographical sources from the twelfth to the fifteenth centuries in order to demonstrate how St Adalbert’s heroic status and retroactively invented ethnic and sacral otherness were exploited for the purposes of institutional and king-like legitimacy vis-à-vis the Polish people. In its conclusions the article argues that concepts and comparative methods from political anthropology can help us to reconsider the category of holy rulers and offer new ways of reading hagiographical sources as political treatises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣阿达贝作为一个陌生的国王:中世纪圣人的英雄化与疏离
中世纪的波兰没有神圣的国王。虽然皮亚斯特政体属于欧洲东北部的边缘地区(中东欧和斯堪的纳维亚半岛),基本上所有公元1000年后的政体都以本土的殉教神圣统治者为自豪,但皮亚斯特人从未将他们的亲属提升到这样的地位。本文以这一令人费解的例外为出发点,提出以下论点:波希米亚血统的波兰圣公会神圣守护神圣阿达伯特(St Adalbert,约956-997年)在许多方面可能被解释为马歇尔·萨林斯(Marshall Sahlins)的异族国王的一个版本。通过结合人类学理论和比较证据,本文探索了从12世纪到15世纪的当地制作的圣徒传记资料,以证明圣阿达贝的英雄地位和追溯发明的种族和神圣的他者性是如何被利用来实现对-à-vis波兰人民的制度和国王般的合法性。文章在结论部分认为,政治人类学的概念和比较方法可以帮助我们重新思考神圣统治者的范畴,并为解读作为政治专著的圣像资料提供新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: History and Anthropology continues to address the intersection of history and social sciences, focusing on the interchange between anthropologically-informed history, historically-informed anthropology and the history of ethnographic and anthropological representation. It is now widely perceived that the formerly dominant ahistorical perspectives within anthropology severely restricted interpretation and analysis. Much recent work has therefore been concerned with social change and colonial history and the traditional problems such as symbolism, have been rethought in historical terms. History and Anthropology publishes articles which develop these concerns, and is particularly interested in linking new substantive analyses with critical perspectives on anthropological discourse.
期刊最新文献
Cocoa and compliance: How exemptions made mass expulsion in Ghana The travelled landscape of Benjamin Harrison and the imagined eolithic world of the Kentish Weald Beyond Idi Amin: urban militarization, Africanization and materiality in Kampalans’ experiences of expulsion Expulsions: Knowledge, temporality, and materiality in Africa ‘A twenty-four hour job’. Hildred and Clifford Geertz’s first foray into the field and the scholarly persona of the ethnographer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1