Could the 4-day week work? A scoping review

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1111/1744-7941.12395
Tesha Jahal, E Anne Bardoel, John Hopkins
{"title":"Could the 4-day week work? A scoping review","authors":"Tesha Jahal,&nbsp;E Anne Bardoel,&nbsp;John Hopkins","doi":"10.1111/1744-7941.12395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 4-day work week (4DWW) was popularised in the 1970s, but has recently gained significant global attention again, with a growing number of organisations experimenting with the 4DWW in response to increasing demand for more flexible work arrangements (FWA) in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, with their potential to support worktime reduction strategies, are also refuelling interest in a shorter working week. This renewed interest motivated this scoping review of 1769 4DWW records from the past 52 years and enabled the authors to identify five major themes: employee acceptance, allocation of time, leisure, gender and career advancement, and productivity. These themes are used to consider specific forms of 4DWW in terms of whether days of work are fixed or flexible, whether the 4DWW is an employee option, and whether total weekly hours worked or pay are reduced. Conservation of resources theory is used as a lens for interpreting the themes. The authors believe these themes and lessons have significant implications for a growing number of scholars and practitioners, who are investigating, trialling, and implementing 4DWW arrangements, in response to growing demand for more FWA options from employees across all sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51582,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1744-7941.12395","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-7941.12395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 4-day work week (4DWW) was popularised in the 1970s, but has recently gained significant global attention again, with a growing number of organisations experimenting with the 4DWW in response to increasing demand for more flexible work arrangements (FWA) in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, with their potential to support worktime reduction strategies, are also refuelling interest in a shorter working week. This renewed interest motivated this scoping review of 1769 4DWW records from the past 52 years and enabled the authors to identify five major themes: employee acceptance, allocation of time, leisure, gender and career advancement, and productivity. These themes are used to consider specific forms of 4DWW in terms of whether days of work are fixed or flexible, whether the 4DWW is an employee option, and whether total weekly hours worked or pay are reduced. Conservation of resources theory is used as a lens for interpreting the themes. The authors believe these themes and lessons have significant implications for a growing number of scholars and practitioners, who are investigating, trialling, and implementing 4DWW arrangements, in response to growing demand for more FWA options from employees across all sectors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每周 4 天工作制可行吗?范围审查
4 天工作周(4DWW)在 20 世纪 70 年代得到推广,但最近又在全球范围内获得了极大的关注,越来越多的组织开始尝试 4 天工作周,以应对 COVID-19 大流行后对更灵活工作安排(FWA)日益增长的需求。ChatGPT 等人工智能生成工具的出现,为缩短工作时间战略提供了潜在支持,也重新激发了人们对缩短工作周的兴趣。这种新的兴趣促使作者对过去 52 年中的 1769 项 4DWW 记录进行了范围审查,并确定了五大主题:员工接受度、时间分配、休闲、性别与职业发展以及生产率。这些主题被用来考虑 4DWW 的具体形式,即工作日是固定的还是灵活的,4DWW 是否是员工的一种选择,以及每周总工作时间或薪酬是否减少。资源保护理论被用作解释这些主题的透镜。作者认为,这些主题和经验教训对越来越多的学者和从业人员具有重要意义,他们正在调查、试验和实施 4DWW 安排,以满足各行各业员工对更多 FWA 选择的日益增长的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources adheres to a rigorous double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources is an applied, peer-reviewed journal which aims to communicate the development and practice of the field of human resources within the Asia Pacific region. The journal publishes the results of research, theoretical and conceptual developments, and examples of current practice. The overall aim is to increase the understanding of the management of human resource in an organisational setting.
期刊最新文献
Fostering Work Engagement: The Effects of Reverse Mentoring and Knowledge Sharing Will Fun and Care Prevent Gig Workers' Withdrawal? A Moderated Mediation Model Correction to “Human Resource Flexibility and Employee Creativity: The Roles of Perceived HR Strength, Career Satisfaction, and Employer Brand” When and Why Does Platform Leadership Drive Employee Intrapreneurship? Moderating Role of Innovation-Oriented Human Resource Management Trade Unions and the British Industrial Relations CrisisBy Peter Ackers, New York and Abingdon-On-Thames, UK: Routledge, 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1