The stochastic digital human is now enrolling for in silico imaging trials – Methods and tools for generating digital cohorts

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1088/2516-1091/ad04c0
Aldo Badano, MIguel Lago, Elena Sizikova, Jana Delfino, Shuyue Guan, Mark A Anastasio, Berkman Sahiner
{"title":"The stochastic digital human is now enrolling for in silico imaging trials – Methods and tools for generating digital cohorts","authors":"Aldo Badano, MIguel Lago, Elena Sizikova, Jana Delfino, Shuyue Guan, Mark A Anastasio, Berkman Sahiner","doi":"10.1088/2516-1091/ad04c0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Randomized clinical trials, while often viewed as the highest evidentiary bar by which to judge the quality of a medical intervention, are far from perfect. In silico imaging trials are computational studies that seek to ascertain the performance of a medical device by collecting this information entirely via computer simulations. The benefits of in silico trials for evaluating new technology include significant resource and time savings, minimization of subject risk, the ability to study devices that are not achievable in the physical world, allow for the rapid and effective investigation of new technologies and ensure representation from all relevant subgroups. To conduct in silico trials, digital representations of humans are needed. We review the latest developments in methods and tools for obtaining digital humans for in silico imaging studies. First, we introduce terminology and a classification of digital human models. Second, we survey available methodologies for generating digital humans with healthy status and for generating diseased cases and discuss briefly the role of augmentation methods. Finally, we discuss approaches for sampling digital cohorts and understanding the trade-offs and potential for study bias associated with selecting specific patient distributions.","PeriodicalId":74582,"journal":{"name":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ad04c0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Randomized clinical trials, while often viewed as the highest evidentiary bar by which to judge the quality of a medical intervention, are far from perfect. In silico imaging trials are computational studies that seek to ascertain the performance of a medical device by collecting this information entirely via computer simulations. The benefits of in silico trials for evaluating new technology include significant resource and time savings, minimization of subject risk, the ability to study devices that are not achievable in the physical world, allow for the rapid and effective investigation of new technologies and ensure representation from all relevant subgroups. To conduct in silico trials, digital representations of humans are needed. We review the latest developments in methods and tools for obtaining digital humans for in silico imaging studies. First, we introduce terminology and a classification of digital human models. Second, we survey available methodologies for generating digital humans with healthy status and for generating diseased cases and discuss briefly the role of augmentation methods. Finally, we discuss approaches for sampling digital cohorts and understanding the trade-offs and potential for study bias associated with selecting specific patient distributions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机数字人现在正在参加计算机成像试验——生成数字队列的方法和工具
随机临床试验通常被视为判断医疗干预质量的最高证据标准,但它远非完美。计算机成像试验是一种计算机研究,旨在通过完全通过计算机模拟收集这些信息来确定医疗设备的性能。评估新技术的硅片试验的好处包括节省大量资源和时间,将受试者风险降至最低,能够研究在物理世界中无法实现的设备,允许对新技术进行快速有效的调查,并确保来自所有相关子群体的代表。为了进行计算机试验,需要人类的数字表示。我们回顾了获取数字人体用于计算机成像研究的方法和工具的最新发展。首先,我们介绍了数字人体模型的术语和分类。其次,我们调查了产生健康状态的数字人类和产生疾病病例的可用方法,并简要讨论了增强方法的作用。最后,我们讨论了采样数字队列的方法,并了解与选择特定患者分布相关的权衡和潜在的研究偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifetime engineering of bioelectronic implants with mechanically reliable thin film encapsulations The stochastic digital human is now enrolling for in silico imaging trials – Methods and tools for generating digital cohorts Updates on polyurethane and its multifunctional applications in biomedical engineering Wearable facial electromyography: in the face of new opportunities A systematic review of cardiac in-silico clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1