Hamiltonian Analysis of f ( Q ) $f(\mathbb {Q})$ Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac–Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity

IF 5.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1002/prop.202300185
Fabio D'Ambrosio, Lavinia Heisenberg, Stefan Zentarra
{"title":"Hamiltonian Analysis of \n \n \n f\n (\n Q\n )\n \n $f(\\mathbb {Q})$\n Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac–Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity","authors":"Fabio D'Ambrosio,&nbsp;Lavinia Heisenberg,&nbsp;Stefan Zentarra","doi":"10.1002/prop.202300185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$f(\\mathbb {Q})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates—and how this number may depend on the form of the function <i>f</i>—has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article it is shown that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm—one of the standard methods to address this type of question—fails. The source of the failure is isolated and it is shown that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in <i>Phys. Rev</i>. <b>D</b> 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, it is shown that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, a more promising strategy for settling this important question is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55150,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics","volume":"71 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prop.202300185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prop.202300185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, f ( Q ) $f(\mathbb {Q})$ gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates—and how this number may depend on the form of the function f—has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article it is shown that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm—one of the standard methods to address this type of question—fails. The source of the failure is isolated and it is shown that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, it is shown that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, a more promising strategy for settling this important question is proposed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
f(Q)$ f(\mathbb {Q})$引力的哈密顿分析和Dirac-Bergmann算法在遥平行引力理论中的失效
近年来,f(Q)$ f(\mathbb {Q})$ gravity在文献中受到了相当大的关注,并取得了重要的成果。然而,这个理论传播了多少个物理自由度的问题——以及这个数字如何取决于函数f的形式——还没有得到令人满意的回答。本文表明,基于Dirac-Bergmann算法(解决这类问题的标准方法之一)的哈密顿分析是失败的。故障的来源是孤立的,并表明其他通常认为的遥平行引力理论也受到同样问题的影响。此外,还指出了物理中所得到的自由度的数目。D第106号修订K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa和T. Qui(即8)基于Dirac-Bergmann算法的4,(2022)是错误的。采用另一种方法,证明了自由度的上界为7。最后,提出了解决这一重要问题的更有希望的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics is a pure online Journal (since 2013). Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics is devoted to the theoretical and experimental studies of fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions e. g. elementary particle physics, classical and quantum field theory, the theory of gravitation and cosmology, quantum information, thermodynamics and statistics, laser physics and nonlinear dynamics, including chaos and quantum chaos. Generally the papers are review articles with a detailed survey on relevant publications, but original papers of general interest are also published.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information: Fortschritte der Physik 12 / 2024 Issue Information: Fortschritte der Physik 11 / 2024 A d S 3 × S 3 $AdS_3 \times S^3$ Background From Poisson–Lie T-Duality Braided Scalar Quantum Electrodynamics Phase Transition and Thermodynamic Stability in an Entropy-Driven Universe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1