A Systematic Review of Identity and Access Management Requirements in Enterprises and Potential Contributions of Self-Sovereign Identity

IF 7.9 3区 管理学 Q1 Computer Science Business & Information Systems Engineering Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s12599-023-00830-x
Jana Glöckler, Johannes Sedlmeir, Muriel Frank, Gilbert Fridgen
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Identity and Access Management Requirements in Enterprises and Potential Contributions of Self-Sovereign Identity","authors":"Jana Glöckler, Johannes Sedlmeir, Muriel Frank, Gilbert Fridgen","doi":"10.1007/s12599-023-00830-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Digital identity and access management (IAM) poses significant challenges for companies. Cyberattacks and resulting data breaches frequently have their root cause in enterprises’ IAM systems. During the COVID-19 pandemic, issues with the remote authentication of employees working from home highlighted the need for better IAM solutions. Using a design science research approach, the paper reviews the requirements for IAM systems from an enterprise perspective and identifies the potential benefits of self-sovereign identity (SSI) – an emerging, passwordless paradigm in identity management that provides end users with cryptographic attestations stored in digital wallet apps. To do so, this paper first conducts a systematic literature review followed by an interview study and categorizes IAM system requirements according to security and compliance, operability, technology, and user aspects. In a second step, it presents an SSI-based prototype for IAM, whose suitability for addressing IAM challenges was assessed by twelve domain experts. The results suggest that the SSI-based authentication of employees can address requirements in each of the four IAM requirement categories. SSI can specifically improve manageability and usability aspects and help implement acknowledged best practices such as the principle of least privilege. Nonetheless, the findings also reveal that SSI is not a silver bullet for all of the challenges that today’s complex IAM systems face.","PeriodicalId":55296,"journal":{"name":"Business & Information Systems Engineering","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business & Information Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00830-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Digital identity and access management (IAM) poses significant challenges for companies. Cyberattacks and resulting data breaches frequently have their root cause in enterprises’ IAM systems. During the COVID-19 pandemic, issues with the remote authentication of employees working from home highlighted the need for better IAM solutions. Using a design science research approach, the paper reviews the requirements for IAM systems from an enterprise perspective and identifies the potential benefits of self-sovereign identity (SSI) – an emerging, passwordless paradigm in identity management that provides end users with cryptographic attestations stored in digital wallet apps. To do so, this paper first conducts a systematic literature review followed by an interview study and categorizes IAM system requirements according to security and compliance, operability, technology, and user aspects. In a second step, it presents an SSI-based prototype for IAM, whose suitability for addressing IAM challenges was assessed by twelve domain experts. The results suggest that the SSI-based authentication of employees can address requirements in each of the four IAM requirement categories. SSI can specifically improve manageability and usability aspects and help implement acknowledged best practices such as the principle of least privilege. Nonetheless, the findings also reveal that SSI is not a silver bullet for all of the challenges that today’s complex IAM systems face.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业身份和访问管理需求的系统回顾及自主身份的潜在贡献
数字身份和访问管理(IAM)给企业带来了巨大的挑战。网络攻击和由此导致的数据泄露往往源于企业的IAM系统。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,在家工作的员工的远程身份验证问题突出了对更好的IAM解决方案的需求。本文采用设计科学研究方法,从企业的角度回顾了IAM系统的需求,并确定了自我主权身份(SSI)的潜在好处。SSI是身份管理中的一种新兴的无密码范式,为最终用户提供存储在数字钱包应用程序中的加密证明。为此,本文首先进行了系统的文献综述,然后进行了访谈研究,并从安全与合规性、可操作性、技术和用户四个方面对IAM系统需求进行了分类。在第二步中,本文提出了一个基于ssii的IAM原型,并由12位领域专家评估了其解决IAM挑战的适用性。结果表明,基于ssid的员工身份验证可以满足四个IAM需求类别中的每一个需求。SSI可以专门改进可管理性和可用性方面,并帮助实现公认的最佳实践,如最小特权原则。尽管如此,研究结果也表明,SSI并不是解决当今复杂IAM系统所面临的所有挑战的灵丹妙药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Business & Information Systems Engineering 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: BISE (Business & Information Systems Engineering) is an international scholarly journal that undergoes double-blind peer review. It publishes scientific research on the effective and efficient design and utilization of information systems by individuals, groups, enterprises, and society to enhance social welfare. Information systems are viewed as socio-technical systems involving tasks, people, and technology. Research in the journal addresses issues in the analysis, design, implementation, and management of information systems.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Openness in Data Platforms: The Impact of Data Artifact Characteristics on Platform Openness Unfolding IoT Adoption: A Status Quo Bias Perspective Managing Dynamics in and Around Business Processes Data Sovereignty in Inter-organizational Information Systems Unveiling Use Cases for Human Resource Mining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1