The social equity and the spatial accessibility of general hospitals in big Chinese cities: An exploration based on different income groups and transportation modes in Shenzhen

Yuanxiang Xia, Wenjian Zhu
{"title":"The social equity and the spatial accessibility of general hospitals in big Chinese cities: An exploration based on different income groups and transportation modes in Shenzhen","authors":"Yuanxiang Xia, Wenjian Zhu","doi":"10.1097/nr9.0000000000000034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: The rational planning and allocation of hospitals significantly improves residents’‘ health and quality of life. However, the unequal allocation of medical resources remains a significant issue in large Chinese cities. This study investigated the disparities in access to healthcare among different social groups in Shenzhen and explored the discrepancy in equity and its influencing mechanisms. Methods: The population was divided into five social groups based on housing prices: high-income, middle-high-income, middle-income, middle-low-income, and low-income. The actual travel times of residential neighborhoods and general hospitals under both driving and public transportation were accessed through the application programming interface Amap, a mapping technology application. The accessibility of general hospitals was calculated by the Gaussian-based two-step floating catchment area method. The Gini coefficient was used to further investigate the equity in medical facility services. Results: Accessibility to first- and second-level hospitals was adequate for the high-income group. However, a significant spatial mismatch in the allocation of hospitals was identified for the middle-low-income and low-income groups, especially those reliant on public transportation. Conclusions: This study reveals an inequitable allocation of hospitals, with driving accessibility generally superior to public transport accessibility in Shenzhen, and a significant spatial mismatch for middle-low-income and low-income groups. This study suggests optimizing public transportation around hospitals and middle-low-income or low-income neighborhoods through urban planning to improve the accessibility of public service facilities for middle-low-income and low-income households, thereby promoting more health equity.","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nr9.0000000000000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The rational planning and allocation of hospitals significantly improves residents’‘ health and quality of life. However, the unequal allocation of medical resources remains a significant issue in large Chinese cities. This study investigated the disparities in access to healthcare among different social groups in Shenzhen and explored the discrepancy in equity and its influencing mechanisms. Methods: The population was divided into five social groups based on housing prices: high-income, middle-high-income, middle-income, middle-low-income, and low-income. The actual travel times of residential neighborhoods and general hospitals under both driving and public transportation were accessed through the application programming interface Amap, a mapping technology application. The accessibility of general hospitals was calculated by the Gaussian-based two-step floating catchment area method. The Gini coefficient was used to further investigate the equity in medical facility services. Results: Accessibility to first- and second-level hospitals was adequate for the high-income group. However, a significant spatial mismatch in the allocation of hospitals was identified for the middle-low-income and low-income groups, especially those reliant on public transportation. Conclusions: This study reveals an inequitable allocation of hospitals, with driving accessibility generally superior to public transport accessibility in Shenzhen, and a significant spatial mismatch for middle-low-income and low-income groups. This study suggests optimizing public transportation around hospitals and middle-low-income or low-income neighborhoods through urban planning to improve the accessibility of public service facilities for middle-low-income and low-income households, thereby promoting more health equity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国大城市综合医院的社会公平与空间可达性——基于深圳不同收入群体和交通方式的探索
【摘要】目的:合理规划和配置医院可显著提高居民的健康水平和生活质量。然而,医疗资源分配不均仍然是中国大城市的一个重要问题。本研究调查了深圳市不同社会群体的医疗服务可及性差异,探讨了公平性差异及其影响机制。方法:根据房价将人口分为高收入、中高收入、中等收入、中低收入和低收入5个社会群体。通过地图技术应用程序高德地图的应用编程接口,获取居民区和综合医院在自驾和公共交通下的实际出行时间。采用基于高斯的两步浮动集水区法计算综合医院的可达性。采用基尼系数进一步考察医疗设施服务公平性。结果:高收入人群的一、二级医院可及性较好。然而,对于中低收入和低收入群体,特别是依赖公共交通的人群,医院的空间配置存在明显的不匹配。结论:深圳市医院配置不公平,驾车可达性总体优于公交可达性,中低收入和低收入人群的空间失配显著。本研究建议通过城市规划优化医院周边和中低收入或低收入社区的公共交通,提高中低收入和低收入家庭公共服务设施的可达性,从而促进更多的健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinary collaboration for chronic illness prevention and management through digital health interventions. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and neurodevelopmental outcomes among black and white preterm infants up to two years of age. Nurse-led self-management support to improve symptom management and self-reported outcomes in people with irritable bowel syndrome. Research of assisted housing design for the bedridden elderly and their family caregivers Digital twin prevalence in the medical caring fields: a bibliomatrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1